Abstract
Equal mixtures of influenza A (PR8) and B (Lee) viruses, based on predetermined ID50 values of the individual preparations, were titrated in closely spaced steps near the 50 per cent infectivity end-point. Typing of the hemagglutinins found in the allantoic fluids after incubation of the eggs for 72 hours showed an approximately equal distribution between types A and B, when less than 2 ID50 of the mixed seed had been injected. With larger inocula influenza A became dominant because it reproduces at a faster rate than the influenza B virus. While this result agreed with expectations, it was found that passage of the allantoic fluids revealing influenza A agglutinins in mixture with anti-A serum, and of B agglutinins with anti-B, yielded the heterologous virus in many instances, even when only one-half of an ID50 of mixed seed had been administered in the original titration. "Negative" fluids obtained from embryos injected with as little as one-eighth of an ID50 upon passage yielded on occasion virus of one or the other type. Similar closely spaced titrations near the 50 per cent end-point of single strains (PR8) indicated that if hemagglutinins were found after incubation of 72 hours they were of high titer, as a rule. However, in some embryos hemagglutinins became detectable only between the 3rd and 4th days of incubation. In addition, negative allantoic fluids removed from embryos 72 hours after injection yielded on occasion virus on passage, yet no hemagglutinins were found in some of these eggs after an additional incubation period of 24 hours, or a total of 96 hours. None of the possible explanations for these various observations, which have been discussed in detail, is completely satisfactory. However, the data indicate that in infectivity titrations the ID50 end-point obtained at 72 hours, or even after 96 hours, does not reflect the total amount of virus present in the material titrated. The data also denote that separation of variants, or mutants or "genetic recombinants" by the limiting dilution technic, although possible, does not represent an absolutely safe procedure.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (830.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- APPLEBY J. C. The isolation and properties of a modified strain of neurotropic influenza A virus. Br J Exp Pathol. 1952 Jun;33(3):280–287. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BURNET F. M., LIND P. E. A genetic approach to variation in influenza viruses; recombination of characters between the influenza virus A strain NWS and strains of different serological subtypes. J Gen Microbiol. 1951 Feb;5(1):67–82. doi: 10.1099/00221287-5-1-67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedewald W. F., Miller E. S., Whatley L. R. THE NATURE OF NON-SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF VIRUS HEMAGGLUTINATION. J Exp Med. 1947 Jun 30;86(1):65–75. doi: 10.1084/jem.86.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Friedewald W. F., Pickels E. G. CENTRIFUGATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION STUDIES ON ALLANTOIC FLUID PREPARATIONS OF INFLUENZA VIRUS. J Exp Med. 1944 Mar 1;79(3):301–317. doi: 10.1084/jem.79.3.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HARDY P. H., Jr, HORSFALL F. L., Jr Reactions between influenza virus and a component of allantoic fluid. J Exp Med. 1948 Oct 1;88(4):463–484. doi: 10.1084/jem.88.4.463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HENLE W., HENLE G. Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system; development of infectivity, hemagglutination, and complement fixation activities during the first infectious cycle. J Exp Med. 1949 Jul;90(1):23–37. doi: 10.1084/jem.90.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HENLE W., LIU O. C. Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. VI. Evidence for multiplicity reactivation of inactivated virus. J Exp Med. 1951 Oct;94(4):305–322. doi: 10.1084/jem.94.4.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HENLE W., ROSENBERG E. B. One-step growth curves of various strains of influenza A and B viruses and their inhibition by inactivated virus of the homologous type. J Exp Med. 1949 Mar;89(3):279–285. doi: 10.1084/jem.89.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henle W., Henle G., Rosenberg E. B. THE DEMONSTRATION OF ONE-STEP GROWTH CURVES OF INFLUENZA VIRUSES THROUGH THE BLOCKING EFFECT OF IRRADIATED VIRUS ON FURTHER INFECTION. J Exp Med. 1947 Oct 31;86(5):423–437. doi: 10.1084/jem.86.5.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ISAACS A., EDNEY M. Variation in laboratory stocks of influenza viruses: genetic aspects of the variations. Br J Exp Pathol. 1950 Apr;31(2):209–216. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knight C. A. TITRATION OF INFLUENZA VIRUS IN CHICK EMBRYOS. J Exp Med. 1944 May 1;79(5):487–495. doi: 10.1084/jem.79.5.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LIU O. C., HENLE W. Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. V. Simultaneous serial passage of the agents of influenza A and B in relation to variations in the growth cycle of influenza B virus. J Exp Med. 1951 Oct;94(4):291–304. doi: 10.1084/jem.94.4.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- VON MAGNUS H. Studies on mouse encephalomyelitis virus (TO strain). IV. Neutralization tests by the intraperitoneal and intracerebral routes. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1951;29(3):243–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ziegler J. E., Horsfall F. L. INTERFERENCE BETWEEN THE INFLUENZA VIRUSES : I. THE EFFECT OF ACTIVE VIRUS UPON THE MULTIPLICATION OF INFLUENZA VIRUSES IN THE CHICK EMBRYO. J Exp Med. 1944 Apr 1;79(4):361–377. doi: 10.1084/jem.79.4.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]