Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1955 May 1;101(5):461–478. doi: 10.1084/jem.101.5.461

STUDIES ON HOST-VIRUS INTERACTIONS IN THE CHICK EMBRYO-INFLUENZA VIRUS SYSTEM

X. AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE VON MAGNUS PHENOMENON

Norman B Finter 1, Oscar C Liu 1, Werner Henle 1
PMCID: PMC2136460  PMID: 14367672

Abstract

An analysis has been made of factors contributing to the von Magnus phenomenon; i.e., the emergence of increasing quantities of non-infectious hemagglutinins (NIHA) in successive passages in the allantois of chick embryos of undiluted allantoic fluids infected with influenza virus. Using the PR8 strain, the von Magnus phenomenon was pronounced when the serial seeds were obtained under conditions which permitted extensive inactivation of infectious virus during individual passages. Correspondingly, it was reduced but not abolished when precautions were taken to avoid accumulation of inactivated virus in the inocula. Thus, inactivated virus may be taken as a contributing factor. Preparations of infectious virus obtained under conditions largely excluding the presence of inactivated virus were capable of yielding some NIHA on passage as long as sufficient amounts were injected to permit each host cell to adsorb several infectious virus particles. However, the fact remains that more NIHA was found in the harvests when the inocula contained a large proportion of non-infectious virus material. Following injection of various types of seeds NIHA appeared in the allantoic fluids as soon as liberation of virus became detectable. This time relationship and the rates of release of non-infectious virus components seemed to exclude that the NIHA obtained consisted entirely of infectious virus which had been inactivated during incubation in ovo. It was apparent rather that NIHA other than that due to heat-inactivated virus was released. Correlations between the infectivities and hemagglutinating capacities of over 50 standard and undiluted passage seeds and the compositions of the harvests derived therefrom on passage without dilution indicated that the corresponding activities in the yields did not depend entirely upon the relative concentrations of infectious virus and non-infectious hemagglutinins in the inocula but that apparently different forms of NIHA were obtained in successive undiluted passages.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERNKOPF H. Study of infectivity and hemagglutination of influenza virus in deembryonated eggs. J Immunol. 1950 Nov;65(5):571–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CAIRNS H. J. F., EDNEY M., FAZEKAS DE ST GROTH S. Quantitative aspects of influenza virus multiplication. J Immunol. 1952 Aug;69(2):155–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DONALD H. B., ISAACS A. Counts of influenza virus particles. J Gen Microbiol. 1954 Jun;10(3):457–464. doi: 10.1099/00221287-10-3-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FINTER N. B., LIU O. C., LIBERMAN M., HENLE W. Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. J Exp Med. 1954 Jul 1;100(1):33–52. doi: 10.1084/jem.100.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GARD S., VON MAGNUS P., SVEDMYR A., BIRCH-ANDERSEN A. Studies on the sedimentation of influenza virus. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1952;4(5):591–611. doi: 10.1007/BF01242026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HANIG M., BERNKOPF H. The sedimentable components of influenza virus propagated in deembryonated eggs. J Immunol. 1950 Nov;65(5):585–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HENLE G., GIRARDI A., HENLE W. A non-transmissible cytopathogenic effect of influenza virus in tissue culture accompanied by formation of non-infectious hemagglutinins. J Exp Med. 1955 Jan 1;101(1):25–41. doi: 10.1084/jem.101.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HENLE W., LIU O. C., FINTER N. B. Studies on host-virus interactions in the chick embryo-influenza virus system. IX. The period of liberation of virus from infected cells. J Exp Med. 1954 Jul 1;100(1):53–70. doi: 10.1084/jem.100.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HORSFALL F. L., Jr On the reproduction of influenza virus; quantitative studies with procedures which enumerate infective and hemagglutinating virus particles. J Exp Med. 1954 Aug 1;100(2):135–161. doi: 10.1084/jem.100.2.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Henle W., Henle G., Rosenberg E. B. THE DEMONSTRATION OF ONE-STEP GROWTH CURVES OF INFLUENZA VIRUSES THROUGH THE BLOCKING EFFECT OF IRRADIATED VIRUS ON FURTHER INFECTION. J Exp Med. 1947 Oct 31;86(5):423–437. doi: 10.1084/jem.86.5.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ISAACS A., EDNEY M. Interference between inactive and active influenza viruses in the chick embryo. I. Quantitative aspects of interference. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1950 Mar;28(2):219–230. doi: 10.1038/icb.1950.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SCHLESINGER R. W. Incomplete growth cycle of influenza virus in mouse brain. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 Jul;74(3):541–548. doi: 10.3181/00379727-74-17966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SCHLESINGER R. W. The relation of functionally deficient forms of influenza virus to viral development. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1953;18:55–59. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1953.018.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TYRRELL D. A., TAMM I., FORSSMAN O. C., HORSFALL F. L., Jr A new count of allontoic cells of the 10-day chick embryo. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jul;86(3):594–598. doi: 10.3181/00379727-86-21175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. UHLER M., GARD S. Lipid content of standard and incomplete influenza A virus. Nature. 1954 May 29;173(4413):1041–1042. doi: 10.1038/1731041a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WERNER G. H., SCHLESINGER R. W. Morphological and quantitative comparison between infectious and non-infectious forms of influenza virus. J Exp Med. 1954 Aug 1;100(2):203–216. doi: 10.1084/jem.100.2.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ziegler J. E., Lavin G. I., Horsfall F. L. INTERFERENCE BETWEEN THE INFLUENZA VIRUSES : II. THE EFFECT OF VIRUS RENDERED NON-INFECTIVE BY ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION UPON THE MULTIPLICATION OF INFLUENZA VIRUSES IN THE CHICK EMBRYO. J Exp Med. 1944 Apr 1;79(4):379–400. doi: 10.1084/jem.79.4.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. von MAGNUS P. Propagation of the PR8 strain of influenza A virus in chick embryos. II. The formation of incomplete virus following inoculation of large doses of seed virus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1951;28(3):278–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1951.tb03693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES