Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1957 Jun 1;105(6):623–634. doi: 10.1084/jem.105.6.623

AGGLUTINATING EFFICIENCY AND COMBINING CAPACITY OF SHIGELLA AND VIBRIO ANTISERA FROM RABBITS AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF IMMUNIZATION

Rolf Freter 1; With The Technical Assistance Of David Hentges1
PMCID: PMC2136711  PMID: 13428929

Abstract

Studies of the relative combining capacities of different antisera to Vibrio cholerae and Shigella flexneri were carried out using the Talmage test. In this test the absorption of an I131 labelled antibody preparation by antigen is blocked by the addition of unlabelled unknown serum. Sera from rabbits in the early stages of immunization ("early antisera") had a high agglutinin titer, but low combining capacity. Sera from hyperimmune rabbits ("late antisera") had higher combining capacities than early antisera, but similar or lower agglutinin titers. More antigen was needed to absorb the agglutinins from late antisera than from early ones of the same agglutinin titer, indicating that late antisera contained relatively more antibody. At high concentrations, sera from hyperimmune rabbits agglutinated the homologous antigen more rapidly than did early antisera, even though early sera had similar or higher agglutinin titers. Sera drawn after the anamnestic response to bacterial antigen had the characteristics of late sera; i.e., their combining capacities were high. The possible significance of these findings for the in vitro estimation of protective antibody is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (636.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. FRETER R. Coproantibody and bacterial antagonism as protective factors in experimental enteric cholera. J Exp Med. 1956 Sep 1;104(3):419–426. doi: 10.1084/jem.104.3.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FRETER R. Experimental enteric Shigella and Vibrio infections in mice and guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1956 Sep 1;104(3):411–418. doi: 10.1084/jem.104.3.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodner K., Horsfall F. L. PROPERTIES OF THE TYPE SPECIFIC PROTEINS OF ANTIPNEUMOCOCCUS SERA : I. THE MOUSE PROTECTIVE VALUE OF TYPE I SERA WITH REFERENCE TO THE PRECIPITIN CONTENT. J Exp Med. 1937 Sep 30;66(4):413–424. doi: 10.1084/jem.66.4.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. LANDY M., WEBSTER M. E. Studies on Vi antigen. III. Immunological properties of purified Vi antigen derived from Escherichia coli 5396/38. J Immunol. 1952 Aug;69(2):143–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. RENOUX G. Anticorps bloquants dans le sérum de sujets brucelliques. II. Leur role dans le phénomène d'agglutination paradoxale. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1950 Aug;79(2):232–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stillman E. G. THE EFFECT OF THE ROUTE OF IMMUNIZATION ON THE IMMUNITY RESPONSE TO PNEUMOCOCCUS TYPE I. J Exp Med. 1930 Apr 30;51(5):721–727. doi: 10.1084/jem.51.5.721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. TAKIGAMI T., TADOKORO I. Agglutination and mouse protection test of the sera from bacillary dysentery patients. Jpn J Exp Med. 1954 Jun;24(3):87–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. TALMAGE D. W., BAKER H. R., AKESON W. The separation and analysis of labelled antibodies. J Infect Dis. 1954 Mar-Apr;94(2):199–212. doi: 10.1093/infdis/94.2.199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. TALMAGE D. W., FRETER G. G., TALIAFERRO W. H. Two antibodies of related specificity but different hemolytic efficiency separated by centrifugation. J Infect Dis. 1956 May-Jun;98(3):300–305. doi: 10.1093/infdis/98.3.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. TALMAGE D. W., FRETER G. G. The blocking of labeled antibody uptake as a measure of the relative combining capacity of anti-red cell serums. J Infect Dis. 1956 May-Jun;98(3):277–292. doi: 10.1093/infdis/98.3.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES