Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1958 Jan 1;107(1):109–124. doi: 10.1084/jem.107.1.109

OCCURRENCE OF DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARTHUS TYPE HYPERSENSITIVITY

S B Salvin 1; With the Technical Assistance of Jane Nishio1
PMCID: PMC2136788  PMID: 13481259

Abstract

Guinea pigs were injected in the footpads with either purified diphtheria toxoid or recrystallized egg albumin in Freund adjuvant without mycobacteria. Each guinea pig was then skin-tested only once with the specific antigen and bled for antibody determination. After injection of the sensitizing antigen, a latent period occurred during which neither sensitivity nor circulating antibody could be detected. A period of delayed sensitivity followed wherein circulating antibody could not be discerned and which could be transferred by lymph node cells. Ultimately, the Arthus type sensitivity developed, accompanied by circulating antibody. The duration and severity of reactions to homologous antigens during the last 2 phases varied with the antigen and with the dose. An increase in the sensitizing dose decreased the duration of the delayed type of allergy, a decrease in the dose prolonged the delayed type. Inclusion of mycobacterium in the sensitizing inoculum tended to introduce delayed sensitivity earlier and delay the onset of Arthus type sensitivity. When specific precipitate in antibody excess was included with the toxoid in the sensitizing dose, the onset of the Arthus phase was hastened. When lymph nodes from a large number of sensitized donors were removed during the latter part of the latent period, recipients of the cells showed a delayed type sensitivity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (875.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. EISEN H. N., ORRIS L., BELMAN S. Elicitation of delayed allergic skin reactions with haptens; the dependence of elicitation on hapten combination with protein. J Exp Med. 1952 May 1;95(5):473–487. doi: 10.1084/jem.95.5.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FREUND J. The mode of action of immunologic adjuvants. Bibl Tuberc. 1956;(10):130–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LAWRENCE H. S. The cellular transfer of cutaneous hypersensitivity to tuberculin in man. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1949 Aug;71(4):516–522. doi: 10.3181/00379727-71-17242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. METAXAS M. N., METAXAS-BUEHLER M. Studies on the cellular transfer of tuberculin sensitivity in the guinea pig. J Immunol. 1955 Nov;75(5):333–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PAPPENHEIMER A. M., SALVIN S. B., UHR J. W. Delayed hypersensitivity. II. Induction of hypersensitivity in guinea pigs by means of antigen-antibody complexes. J Exp Med. 1957 Jan 1;105(1):11–24. doi: 10.1084/jem.105.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES