Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 4;335(7632):1251–1254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39399.456551.25

Table 4.

 Patient in internal fixation group who healed uneventfully (n=53) compared with those in hemiarthroplasty group

Healed internal fixation Hemiarthroplasty Mean difference or relative risk (95% CI) P value
Mean (SD) Harris hip score
At 4 months 63.4 (14.8) (n=37) 67.7 (15.8) (n=84) 4.4 (−1.7 to 10.4) 0.16
At 12 months 63.7 (16.7) (n=37) 72.6 (17.5) (n=74) 8.8 (1.9 to 15.7) 0.01
At 24 months 63.9 (12.0) (n=29) 70.6 (19.1) (n=68) 6.7 (0.3 to 13.1) 0.04
Mean (SD) Eq-5d index score and visual analogue scale
Index score:
 At 4 months 0.58 (0.22) (n=29) 0.61 (0.30) (n=70) 0.03 (−0.10 to 0.15) 0.67
 At 12 months 0.57 (0.32) (n=27) 0.65 (0.30) (n=62) 0.08 (−0.06 to 0.22) 0.26
 At 24 months 0.48 (0.41) (n=17) 0.72 (0.23) (n=52) 0.24 (0.02 to 0.46) 0.03
Visual analogue scale:
 At 4 months 56 (15.2) (n=26) 62 (21.0) (n=60) 5.6 (−3.5 to 14.7) 0.22
 At 12 months 51 (15.6) (n=22) 63 (24.3) (n=54) 12.1 (2.7 to 21.4) 0.01
 At 24 months 55 (11.2) (n=14) 60 (21.0) (n=43) 4.4 (−4.4 to 13.2) 0.32
No (%) with Barthel index score of 95 or 100
At 4 months 16 (44) (n=36) 40 (50) (n=80) 0.89* (0.58 to1.36) 0.58
At 12 months 10 (27) (n=37) 39 (53) (n=73) 0.51* (0.29 to 0.90) 0.01
At 24 months 6 (21) (n=28) 36 (53) (n=68) 0.41* (0.19 to 0.85) 0.01

*Relative risk.