Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1960 Jul 1;112(1):143–166. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.1.143

STUDIES ON INFECTION AND IMMUNITY IN EXPERIMENTAL TYPHOID FEVER

I. TYPHOID FEVER IN CHIMPANZEES ORALLY INFECTED WITH SALMONELLA TYPHOSA

Geoffrey Edsall 1, Sidney Gaines 1, Maurice Landy 1, W D Tigertt 1, Helmuth Sprinz 1, R-J Trapani 1, Adrian D Mandel 1, A S Benenson 1
PMCID: PMC2137207  PMID: 13725751

Abstract

A disease resembling human typhoid fever has been induced by feeding live cultures of Salmonella typhosa to young chimpanzees, thus confirming the classical reports of Grünbaum and of Metchnikoff and Besredka. Detailed clinical observations, results of stool and blood cultures, and serological studies have confirmed the impression that the disease produced in chimpanzees closely resembles the mild form of human typhoid fever frequently seen in childhood. Gross and histologic examination of intestines, mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, spleen, and other organs of orally infected chimpanzees has demonstrated that the pathological findings are essentially indistinguishable from those seen in mild typhoid fever in man. The clinical spectrum of disease seen in chimpanzees ranged from moderately severe illness, through transitory illness, to afebrile infection with or without bacteriemia (but invariably with an antibody response), occasionally leading to the development of persisting biliary infection and the carrier state. Thus the range of illness observed in chimpanzees resembled that seen in man, except that the severe and complicated forms of typhoid fever were not observed in the chimpanzee. A reason for this difference is proposed and discussed. In contrast to the limitations imposed upon the interpretation of human epidemiologic observations, it has been possible to demonstrate in the chimpanzee that clinical variation in disease pattern from animal to animal may occur despite the administration of the same dose of the same bacterial strain simultaneously to an entire group of animals under study; in other words, variation in clinical pattern is dependent on inherent, non-specific host factors as well as on dose, strain or preceding state of immunity. Variation in dose and in challenge strain of S. typhosa employed also appeared to have an effect upon the likelihood of producing febrile as against afebrile infection in chimpanzees. The dose required to produce clinical disease, even with the more virulent strain, was excessively large compared to what is believed to be the dose required to produce illness in man; the limitations of this assumption, and suggested explanations for the findings, are discussed. The production of the spectrum of typhoid fever in the chimpanzee has made possible the study of basic problems in this disease which are not amenable to definitive study through the use of prevailing laboratory techniques.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almon L., Read J., Stovall W. D. A Study of the Vi Antigenic Fraction of Typhoid Bacilli Isolated from Carriers and Cases, and the Antibody Content of the Serum of These Patients. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1937 Apr;27(4):357–362. doi: 10.2105/ajph.27.4.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRADLEY W. H., EVANS L. W., TAYLOR I. A hospital outbreak of typhoid fever. J Hyg (Lond) 1951 Jun-Sep;49(2-3):324–334. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400044193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatnagar S. S. Vi Agglutination in Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever. Br Med J. 1938 Dec 10;2(4066):1195–1198. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4066.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. EDSALL G., CARLSON M. C., FORMAL S. B., BENENSON A. S. Laboratory tests of typhoid vaccines used in a controlled field study. Bull World Health Organ. 1959;20:1017–1032. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Felix A. A New Type of Typhoid and Paratyphoid Vaccine. Br Med J. 1941 Mar 15;1(4184):391–395. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.4184.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUANG N. N. The antibody response of infants and children to VI antigen. Am J Hyg. 1959 Nov;70:275–279. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LANDY M. Enhancement of the immunogenicity of typhoid vaccine by retention of the V1 antigen. Am J Hyg. 1953 Sep;58(2):148–164. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LANDY M., GAINES S., SPRINZ H. Studies on intracerebral typhoid infection in mice. I. Characteristics of the infection. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957 Feb;38(1):15–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. LANDY M., GAINES S., SPRINZ H. Studies on intracerebral typhoid infection in mice. II. Immunological factors concerned in protection. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957 Feb;38(1):25–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LANDY M., LAMB E. Estimation of Vi antibody employing erythrocytes treated with purified Vi antigen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Apr;82(4):593–598. doi: 10.3181/00379727-82-20188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LANDY M. The visual identification of V and W form colonies in Salmonella cultures. Public Health Rep. 1950 Jul 28;65(30):950–951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MARMION D. E., NAYLOR G. R., STEWART I. O. Second attacks of typhoid fever. J Hyg (Lond) 1953 Jun;51(2):260–267. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400015680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Norton J. F., Dingle J. H. Virulence Tests for Typhoid Bacilli and Antibody Relationships in Antityphoid Sera. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1935 May;25(5):609–617. doi: 10.2105/ajph.25.5.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES