Abstract
In earlier observations with the picryl system, it was concluded that contact sensitivity was a form of delayed (cellular) hypersensitivity to conjugates of sensitizer with autologous proteins indistinguishable in its immunological mechanism from other classical forms of delayed hypersensitivity to proteins. This conclusion has been confirmed and extended with the picryl and chlorbenzoyl chloride systems. 1. It is shown that to induce a state of contact sensitivity, the minimal necessary amounts of hapten are of the same order of magnitude, whether this hapten is conjugated with protein or the free reactive chemical itself. From this, it is evident that contamination of conjugates with small amounts of unreacted sensitizer plays no part in the induction of contact reactivity by the conjugate. With the dinitrophenyl system, no contact sensitivity could be induced by the conjugates used; possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. 2. Animals sensitized to contact by homologous conjugate can be completely desensitized by injections of such a conjugate in large amount; a similar injection schedule has no effect on the contact sensitivity of animals sensitized with the free reactive sensitizer. 3. The capacity of heterologous (ovalbumin) conjugates to evoke anti-hapten antibodies is shown to be greater than that of homologous (guinea pig seralbumin) conjugates: the reverse is true of their capacity to induce delayed reactivity. 4. Evidence is brought forward to suggest that in animals sensitized with homologous albumin conjugates, the specificity of the delayed reaction involves more than the hapten alone, even though the carrier protein is non-antigenic on its own. The contrast with the apparent lesser specificity of the antibodies later produced is discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (803.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BENACERRAF B., GELL P. G. Studies on hypersensitivity. III. The relation between delayed reactivity to the picryl group of conjugates and contact sensitivity. Immunology. 1959 Jul;2:219–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHASE M. W. Experimental sensitization with particular reference to picryl chloride. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1954;5(2):163–191. doi: 10.1159/000228095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EISEN H. N., KERN M., NEWTON W. T., HELMREICH E. A study of the distribution of 2,4-dinitrobenzene sensitizers between isolated lymph node cells and extracellular medium in relation to induction of contact skin sensitivity. J Exp Med. 1959 Aug 1;110(2):187–206. doi: 10.1084/jem.110.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landsteiner K., Chase M. W. STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS : IX. SKIN SENSITIZATION INDUCED BY INJECTION OF CONJUGATES. J Exp Med. 1941 Feb 28;73(3):431–438. doi: 10.1084/jem.73.3.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landsteiner K., Chase M. W. STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS : VII. SKIN SENSITIZATION BY INTRAPERITONEAL INJECTIONS. J Exp Med. 1940 Jan 31;71(2):237–245. doi: 10.1084/jem.71.2.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OVARY Z., BRIOT M. Nouvelle méthode de dosage de l'anticorps anaphylactique et son rapport avec l'azote de l'anticorps. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1951 Dec;81(6):670–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]