Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1963 Jan 31;117(2):197–212. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.2.197

THE IN VITRO PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODY BY DELAYED PHASE CORNEAL LIMBAL LYMPHOID FOCI

Howard M I Leibowitz 1, James J Parks 1
PMCID: PMC2137604  PMID: 13929408

Abstract

The intracorneal inoculation of a sufficient quantity of a soluble protein antigen into the eye of a rabbit produces a biphasic allergic reaction in that cornea. The earlier stage, characterized by a diffuse corneal clouding, is a manifestation of delayed hypersensitivity and is accompanied by a limbal infiltrate composed predominantly of lymphocytic-mononuclear elements. The later response, known as the Wessely Phenomenon, is a ring of opacification in the cornea which is visible in the gross. This reaction is dependent upon the presence of specific circulating antibodies and is therefore classified among the immediate types of hypersensitivity. It is accompanied by a dense limbal infiltration of plasma cells. Intervening between the two reactions is a period of several days during which the eye appears relatively normal. Explants containing large numbers of infiltrating lymphocytic-mononuclear elements were removed from the corneal-scleral junction of experimental eyes during the height of the delayed type hypersensitivity reaction and maintained in vitro in tissue culture. At a later date the overlay fluid in which the explants were maintained was shown to contain specific humoral antibodies, demonstrating the capability of cells present at a delayed reaction for the later production of antibodies. The possible linkage of the two modes of immune phenomena is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BREEBAART A. C., JAMES-WITTE J. Studies on experimental corneal allergy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1959 Jul;48(1 Pt 1):37–47. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(59)90283-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dienes L., Mallory T. B. Histological Studies of Hypersensitive Reactions. Am J Pathol. 1932 Nov;8(6):689–710.3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GELL P. G., HINDE I. T. Observations on the histology of the Arthus reaction and its relation to other known types of skin hypersensitivity. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1954;5(1):23–46. doi: 10.1159/000228084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GERMUTH F. G., Jr, MAUMENEE A. E., PRATT-JOHNSON J., SENTERFIT L. B., VAN ARNAM C. E., POLLACK A. D. Observations on the site and mechanisms of antigen-antibody interaction in anaphylactic hypersensitivity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1958 Nov;46(5 Pt 2):282–287. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(58)90809-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LESKOWITZ S., WAKSMAN B. H. Studies on immunization. 1. The effect of route of injection of bovine serum albumin in Freund adjuvant on production of circulating antibody and delayed hypersensitivity. J Immunol. 1960 Jan;84:58–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. OVARY Z. Immediate reactions in the skin of experimental animals provoked by antibody-antigen interaction. Prog Allergy. 1958;5:459–508. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. PAPPENHEIMER A. M., SALVIN S. B., UHR J. W. Delayed hypersensitivity. II. Induction of hypersensitivity in guinea pigs by means of antigen-antibody complexes. J Exp Med. 1957 Jan 1;105(1):11–24. doi: 10.1084/jem.105.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. PARKS J. J., LEIBOWITZ H. M., MAUMENEE A. E. A transient stage of suspected delayed sensitivity during the early induction phase of immediate corneal sensitivity. J Exp Med. 1962 Apr 1;115:867–880. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.4.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. PARKS J. J., LEIBOWITZ H. M., MAUMENEE A. E. The effect of route of inoculation upon development of antibody in rabbits. J Immunol. 1961 Aug;87:199–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. RAFFEL S., NEWEL J. M. The delayed hypersensitivity induced by antigen-antibody complexes. J Exp Med. 1958 Dec 1;108(6):823–841. doi: 10.1084/jem.108.6.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SALVIN S. B. Occurrence of delayed hypersensitivity during the development of Arthus type hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1958 Jan 1;107(1):109–124. doi: 10.1084/jem.107.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SALVIN S. B., SMITH R. F. The specificity of allergic reactions. I. Delayed versus Arthus hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1960 Apr 1;111:465–483. doi: 10.1084/jem.111.4.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SELL S., WEIGLE W. O. The relationship between delayed hypersensitivity and circulating antibody induced by protein antigens in guinea pigs. J Immunol. 1959 Sep;83:257–263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WAKSMAN B. H., MATOLTSY M. The effect of tuberculin on peritoneal exudate cells of sensitized guinea pigs in surviving cell culture. J Immunol. 1958 Sep;81(3):220–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES