Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1964 Jan 1;119(1):21–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.1.21

THE FORMATION AND PROPERTIES OF POLIOVIRUS-NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODY

II. 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY FORMATION: DIFFERENCES IN ANTIGEN DOSE REQUIREMENT FOR SUSTAINED SYNTHESIS, ANAMNESIS, AND SENSITIVITY TO X-IRRADIATION

Sven-Eric Svehag 1, Benjamin Mandel 1
PMCID: PMC2137809  PMID: 14113114

Abstract

Transient 19S antibody formation was induced in rabbits by single or repeated stimuli with a small dose of poliovirus. Available evidence indicated that cessation of 19S synthesis was due to lack of continuous antigenic stimulation and not to loss of cells participating in antibody formation. "Immunological memory" in 19S antibody formation was demonstrable only within 2 to 3 days following discontinuation of synthesis but not thereafter. Following stimulation with a high dose of polio-virus both 19S and 7S antibodies were formed. The kinetics of their formation differed in several respects: (a) 19S antibody preceded 7S antibody by ⩾1½ days; (b) 19S antibody rose to peak titers at a rapid exponential rate within 1 week, while 7S antibody increased at a slow decelerating rate for ⩽3 weeks; (c) 19S antibody formation was short-lasting while 7S antibody synthesis endured. A renewed formation of both antibodies occurred following restimulation with a high antigen dose. The secondary 19S and 7S antibody responses were similar to the respective primary responses, and the preexistence of 7S antibody synthesis did not detectably alter the secondary 19S response. Both 19S and 7S antibodies were formed and the kinetics of their formation was similar (a) for infectious and non-infectious (UV-) poliovirus antigen; (b) for the serologically unrelated poliovirus and Coxsackie B-4 virus; (c) when poliovirus was administered by different routes; (d) when 1-day-old or adult rabbits were immunized; (e) in antibody responses to poliovirus in rabbit, guinea pig, and man. Whole body x-irradiation 20 hours prior to antigenic stimulus (high dose) resulted in delayed but markedly prolonged 19S antibody formation and inhibition of 7S antibody synthesis. Thus, the formation of 19S and 7S antibody differed in (a) antigen dose requirements for induction and maintained synthesis; (b) kinetics; (c) retention of memory; and (d) sensitivity to prior x-irradiation. These differences are best explained on the assumption that the two antibodies are produced by different cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,000.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAUER D. C., MATHIES M. J., STAVITSKY A. B. Sequences of synthesis of gamma-1 macroglobulin and gamma-2 globulin antibodies during primary and secondary responses to proteins, salmonella antigens, and phage. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:889–907. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BELLANTI J. A., EITZMAN D. V., ROBBINS J. B., SMITH R. T. The development of the immune response. Studies on the agglutinin response to Salmonella flagellar antigens in the newborn rabbit. J Exp Med. 1963 Mar 1;117:479–496. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.3.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CRUCHAUD A., ROSEN F. S., CRAIG J. M., JANEWAY C. A., GITLIN D. The site of synthesis of the 19S gamma-globulins in dysgammaglobulinemia. J Exp Med. 1962 Jun 1;115:1141–1148. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.6.1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DAVENPORT F. M., HENNESSY A. V. A serologic recapitulation of past experiences with influenza A; antibody response to monovalent vaccine. J Exp Med. 1956 Jul 1;104(1):85–97. doi: 10.1084/jem.104.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GUNDERSON C. H., JURAS D., LA VIA M. F., WISSLER R. W. Tissue and cellular changes associated with antibody formation in the rat spleen. JAMA. 1962 Jun 23;180:1038–1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LE BOUVIER G. L. The D to C change in poliovirus particles. Br J Exp Pathol. 1959 Dec;40:605–620. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LOSPALLUTO J., MILLER W., Jr, DORWARD B., FINK C. W. The formation of macroglobulin antibodies. I. Studies on adult humans. J Clin Invest. 1962 Jul;41:1415–1421. doi: 10.1172/JCI104596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MANDEL B. Studies on the interactions of poliomyelitis virus, antibody, and host cells in tissue culture system. Virology. 1958 Oct;6(2):424–447. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(58)90092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MAYER M. M., RAPP H. J., ROIZMAN B., KLEIN S. W., COWAN K. M., LUKENS D. The purification of poliomyelitis virus as studied by complement fixation. J Immunol. 1957 Jun;78(6):435–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SCHWEET R. S., OWEN R. D. Concepts of protein synthesis in relation to antibody formation. J Cell Physiol Suppl. 1957 Dec;50(Suppl 1):199–228. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030500414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. SVEHAG S. E., MANDEL B. The production and properties of poliovirus neutralizing antibody of rabbit origin. Virology. 1962 Nov;18:508–510. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(62)90050-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. THORBECKE G. J., ASOFSKY R. M., HOCHWALD G. M., SISKIND G. W. Gamma globulin and antibody formation in vitro. III. Induction of secondary response at different intervals after the primary; the role of secondary nodules in the preparation for the secondary response. J Exp Med. 1962 Sep 1;116:295–310. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.3.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. UHR J. W., FINKELSTEIN M. S. Antibody formation. IV. Formation of rapidly and slowly sedimenting antibodies and immunological memory to bacteriophage phi-X 174. J Exp Med. 1963 Mar 1;117:457–477. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.3.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. UHR J. W., FINKELSTEIN M. S., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. III. The primary and secondary antibody response to bacteriophage phi X 174 in guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1962 Mar 1;115:655–670. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES