Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1965 Jul 1;122(1):67–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.1.67

INDIGENOUS, NORMAL, AND AUTOCHTHONOUS FLORA OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT

René Dubos 1, Russell W Schaedler 1, Richard Costello 1, Philippe Hoet 1
PMCID: PMC2138034  PMID: 14325474

Abstract

The bacterial flora of the gastrointestinal tract differs qualitatively and quantitatively from one colony of mice to another. Certain components of this flora, however, are always present in large and approximately constant numbers in healthy adult mice, irrespective of the colony from which the animals are derived. Lactobacilli and anaerobic streptococci are extremely numerous in the stomach, the small intestine, and the large intestine. In contrast, organisms of the bacteroides group proliferate only in the large intestine. These three bacterial species persist at approximately constant levels in their characteristic localization throughout the life span of healthy animals. They are closely associated with the walls of the digestive organs, and are probably concentrated in the mucous layer. A few experiments carried out with rats and young swine indicate that lactobacilli are also present in large numbers in the stomach of these animal species. It is suggested that some of the components of the gastrointestinal flora have become symbiotic with their hosts in the course of evolutionary development and thus constitute a true autochthonous flora. The other components of the indigenous flora are acquired early in life either through accidental contact or because they are ubiquitous in the environment. The "normal" flora is that which is always present in the environment of the animal colony under consideration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (690.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DUBOS R. J., SCHAEDLER R. W. The effect of diet on the fecal bacterial flora of mice and on their resistance to infection. J Exp Med. 1962 Jun 1;115:1161–1172. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.6.1161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DUBOS R. J., SCHAEDLER R. W. The effect of the intestinal flora on the growth rate of mice, and on their susceptibility to experimental infections. J Exp Med. 1960 Mar 1;111:407–417. doi: 10.1084/jem.111.3.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DUOBOS R., SCHAEDLER R. W., COSTELLO R. COMPOSITION, ALTERATION, AND EFFECTS OF THE INTESTINAL FLORA. Fed Proc. 1963 Nov-Dec;22:1322–1329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GYLLENBERG H., ROINE P. The value of colony counts in evaluating the abundance of Lactobacillus bifidus in infant faeces. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1957;41(2):144–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1957.tb01010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SCHAEDLER R. W., DUBOS R. J. The fecal flora of various strains of mice. Its bearing on their susceptibility to endotoxin. J Exp Med. 1962 Jun 1;115:1149–1160. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.6.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SCHAEDLER R. W., DUBOS R., COSTELLO R. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BACTERIAL FLORA IN THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT OF MICE. J Exp Med. 1965 Jul 1;122:59–66. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES