Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1966 Jun 1;123(6):1013–1024. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.6.1013

THE ENHANCING EFFECT OF THE MICROBIAL FLORA ON MACROPHAGE FUNCTION AND THE IMMUNE RESPONSE

A STUDY IN GERMFREE MICE

Heinz Bauer 1, Fiorenzo Paronetto 1, Willard A Burns 1, Albert Einheber 1
PMCID: PMC2138179  PMID: 5328828

Abstract

The immune response to bacteria and to a soluble protein was compared in germfree and conventionalized mice. Sixty germfree and 59 conventionalized mice received a suspension of killed Serratia marcescens into one front foot-pad and sterile horse ferritin into the other and were sacrificed in groups from 2 hr to 14 days after inoculation. All mice had no pre-existing antibody to either antigen and the flora of the conventionalized mice never contained Serratia. Lymphatic tissue changes and the fate of the antigens were followed in axillary lymph nodes and the spleens by histologic, fluorescent antibody, and autoradiographic techniques after tritiated thymidine injection. Individual serum antibody titers for both antigens were determined at each time period. The cellular and serologic responses were slightly delayed in the germfree mice but later equaled and sometimes exceeded those of the conventional animals. In all animals, lymph nodes draining the site of Serratia injection showed a more vigorous response than those on the ferritin-injected side but the reaction was qualitatively the same for both antigens. All lymph nodes contained the antigens by 2 hr after foot-pad injection. With time, both antigens lost their particulate nature sooner in conventionalized than in germfree macrophages. In the latter, both antigens persisted throughout the study while no longer demonstrable with fluoresceinated antiserum in conventional macrophages after the first week. While phagocytosis is equal in germfree and conventional mice, a greater digestive capacity of macrophages for antigens seems to result from the continuous exposure of conventional animals to the immunologic effects of the microbial flora. Conversely, the lack of substantial antigenic stimulation of lymphatic tissue in germfree animals fails to develop these macrophage functions beyond their basic ability to degrade foreign substances. Although the onset of the immune response is delayed in germfree mice, the relatively prolonged antigen digestion and the presumably slower release of immunogenic antigen fragments result in a more sustained and sometimes greater response than in conventional animals. This modifying effect of the microflora on the function of macrophages during the immune response is independent of previous experience with, or the nature of, the antigen.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (874.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADA G. L., NOSSAL G. J., AUSTIN C. M. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. V. THE ABILITY OF CELLS IN LYMPHOID FOLLICLES TO RECOGNIZE FOREIGNNESS. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:331–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ADA G. L., NOSSAL G. J., PYE J. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. III. DISTRIBUTION OF IODINATED ANTIGENS FOLLOWING INJECTION INTO RATS VIA THE HIND FOOTPADS. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:295–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BAUER H., HOROWITZ R. E., LEVENSON S. M., POPPER H. The response of the lymphatic tissue to the microbial flora. Studies on germfree mice. Am J Pathol. 1963 Apr;42:471–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COHN Z. A. THE FATE OF BACTERIA WITHIN PHAGOCYTIC CELLS. 3. DESTRUCTION OF AN ESCHERICHIA COLI AGGLUTINOGEN WITHIN POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES AND MACROPHAGES. J Exp Med. 1964 Nov 1;120:869–883. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.5.869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CONGDON C. C. THE EARLY HISTOLOGIC EFFECTS OF ANTIGENIC STIMULATION. Arch Pathol. 1964 Aug;78:83–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DOLOWY W. C., MULDOON R. L. STUDIES OF GERMFREE ANIMALS. I. RESPONSE OF MICE TO INFECTION WITH INFLUENZA A VIRUS. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1964 Jun;116:365–371. doi: 10.3181/00379727-116-29249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FISHMAN M., HAMMERSTROM R. A., BOND V. P. In vitro transfer of macrophage RNA to lymph node cells. Nature. 1963 May 11;198:549–551. doi: 10.1038/198549a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FLIEDNER T., KESSE M., CRONKITE E. P., ROBERTSON J. S. CELL PROLIFERATION IN GERMINAL CENTERS OF THE RAT SPLEEN. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Feb 28;113:578–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb40692.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GILL F. A., COLE R. M. THE FATE OF A BACTERIAL ANTIGEN (STREPTOCOCCAL M PROTEIN) AFTER PHAGOCYTOSIS BY MACROPHAGES. J Immunol. 1965 Jun;94:898–915. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GUNDERSON C. H., JURAS D., LA VIA M. F., WISSLER R. W. Tissue and cellular changes associated with antibody formation in the rat spleen. JAMA. 1962 Jun 23;180:1038–1047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HANNA M. G., Jr AN AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE GERMINAL CENTER IN SPLEEN WHITE PULP DURING EARLY INTERVALS OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Lab Invest. 1964 Feb;13:95–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HOROWITZ R. E., BAUER H., PARONETTO F., ABRAMS G. D., WATKINS K. C., POPPER H. THE RESPONSE OF THE LYMPHATIC TISSUE TO BACTERIAL ANTIGEN. STUDIES IN GERMFREE MICE. Am J Pathol. 1964 May;44:747–761. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. IKARI N. S. BACTERICIDAL ANTIBODY TO ESCHERICHIA COLI IN GERM-FREE MICE. Nature. 1964 May 30;202:879–881. doi: 10.1038/202879a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LANGEVOORT H. L. The histophysiology of the antibody response. I. Histogenesis of the plasma cell reaction in rabbit spleen. Lab Invest. 1963 Jan;12:106–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LITT M. STUDIES IN EXPERIMENTAL EOSINOPHILIA. 7. EOSINOPHILS IN LYMPH NODES DURING THE FIRST 24 HR FOLLOWING PRIMARY ANTIGENIC STIMULATION. J Immunol. 1964 Nov;93:807–813. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. LITT M. Studies in experimental eosinophilia. V. Eosinophils in lynph nodes of guinea pigs following primary antigenic stimulation. Am J Pathol. 1963 May;42:529–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MAY J. R., RAWLINS G. A. A micro method for agar-gel precipitin reactions. J Clin Pathol. 1962 Mar;15:186–189. doi: 10.1136/jcp.15.2.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. NOSSAL G. J., ADA G. L., AUSTIN C. M. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. IV. CELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF 125-I- AND 131-I-LABELLED FLAGELLA IN LYMPH NODES. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:311–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. NOSSAL G. J. Genetic control of lymphopoiesis, plasma cell formation, and antibody production. Int Rev Exp Pathol. 1962;1:1–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. OORT J., TURK J. L. A HISTOLOGICAL AND AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF LYMPH NODES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTACT SENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA-PIG. Br J Exp Pathol. 1965 Apr;46:147–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. PARONETTO F., HOROWITZ R. E., SICULAR A., BURROWS L., KARK A. E., POPPER H. IMMUNOLOGIC OBSERVATIONS ON HOMOGRAFTS. I. THE CANINE LIVER. Transplantation. 1965 May;3:303–317. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196505000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. REITMAN M., SUTTON L. S., ALG R. L., MILLER W. S., GROSS N. H. Agglutinins in sera of laboratory workers exposed to Serratia marcescens. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1955 Jun;89(2):236–240. doi: 10.3181/00379727-89-21769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. RIEKE W. O., CAFFREY R. W., EVERETT N. B. RATES OF PROLIFERATION AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF CELLS IN THE MESENTERIC LYMPH NODE OF THE RAT. Blood. 1963 Dec;22:674–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. ROBERTS A. N., HAUROWITZ F. Intracellular localization and quantitation of tritiated antigens in reticuloendothelial tissues of mice during secondary and hyperimmune responses. J Exp Med. 1962 Oct 1;116:407–422. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.4.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. SCHEIDEGGER J. J. Une micro-méthode de l'immuno-electrophorèse. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1955;7(2):103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. SCHOOLEY J. C. Autoradiographic observations of plasma cell formation. J Immunol. 1961 Mar;86:331–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. STAVITSKY A. B. Micromethods for the study of proteins and antibodies. I. Procedure and general applications of hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition reactions with tannic acid and protein-treated red blood cells. J Immunol. 1954 May;72(5):360–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SUTER E., KIRSANOW E. M. Fate of attenuated tubercle bacilli (BCG) in germ-free and conventional mice. Nature. 1962 Jul 28;195:397–398. doi: 10.1038/195397b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. TENNANT R. W., PARKER J. C., WARD T. G. VIRUS STUDIES WITH GERMFREE MICE. II. COMPARATIVE RESPONSES OF GERMFREE MICE TO VIRUS INFECTION. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1965 Mar;34:381–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WEISS L. THE WHITE PULP OF THE SPLEEN. THE RELATIONSHIPS OF ARTERIAL VESSELS, RETICULUM AND FREE CELLS IN THE PERIARTERIAL LYMPHATIC SHEATH. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1964 Aug;115:99–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. YOFFEY J. M., REINHARDT W. O., EVERETT N. B. The uptake of tritium-labelled thymidine by lymphoid tissue. J Anat. 1961 Jul;95:293–299. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES