Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1966 Sep 1;124(3):379–395. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.3.379

MECHANISMS OF IMMUNOLOGIC INJURY OF RAT PERITONEAL MAST CELLS

I. THE EFFECT OF PHOSPHONATE INHIBITORS ON THE HOMOCYTOTROPIC ANTIBODY-MEDIATED HISTAMINE RELEASE AND THE FIRST COMPONENT OF RAT COMPLEMENT

Elmer L Becker 1, K Frank Austen 1
PMCID: PMC2138236  PMID: 4162485

Abstract

The ability of a number of p-nitrophenylethyl, alkyl phenylalkyl, chloroalkyl, and aminoalkyl phosphonates to inhibit the homocytotropic antibody-mediated release of histamine from rat peritoneal mast cells has been tested. The effectiveness of these same phosphonates against the activated first component of rat complement (C'1a) has also been investigated. The rat mast cell esterase activated by the reaction of antigen and homocytotropic antibody resembles chymotrypsin in its reactivity with the phenylalkyl and chloroalkyl phosphonate, but is unlike this protease in its greater responsiveness to the 5-aminopentyl phosphonate relative to the pentyl phosphonate. The antigen-homocytotropic antibody-activated mast cell esterase and chymotrypsin, thus, appear to be similar, but different enzymes; i.e., they are parazymes (see reference 4, p. 501). There are distinct differences in the pattern of inhibition given by the phenylalkyl and aminoalkyl and alkyl phosphonates of the homocytotropic antibody-mediated histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells and from guinea pig lung slices. On the basis of these differences it is concluded that the esterases activated by the combination of antigen and homocytotropic antibody on the mast cells of the two species are not the same. The arithmetic dose response curve found for the action of the phosphonates on the antigen-induced histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells contrasted sharply with the logarithmic relationship found when these same inhibitors acted on the guinea pig lung system. This suggests that in addition to the antigen-antibody-activated esterases being unlike, the detailed mode of histamine release from the mast cells of the guinea pig lung differs from that of the mast cells of the rat peritoneum. Distinct and large differences were found in the pattern of inhibition of histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells and of rat C'1a given by the phenylalkyl, and chloroalkyl and alkyl phosphonates implying that esterase activated by the combination of antigen with the sensitized rat peritoneal mast cells is not C'1a. Thus, the results with the peritoneal mast cells lead to the same conclusion as the previous work with guinea pig lung slices; i.e., the antigen-antibody-activated esterase involved in the homocytotropic antibody-mediated release of histamine is not part of the complement system.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (864.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AUSTEN K. F., BROCKLEHURST W. E. Anaphylaxis in chopped guinea pig lung. I. Effect of peptidase substrates and inhibitors. J Exp Med. 1961 Mar 1;113:521–539. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.3.521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Austen K. F., Becker E. L. Mechanisms of immunologic injury of rat peritoneal mast cells. II. Complement requirement and phosphonate ester inhibition of release of histamine by rabbit anti-rat gamma globulin. J Exp Med. 1966 Sep 1;124(3):397–416. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BECKER E. L., AUSTEN K. F. A COMPARISON OF THE SPECIFICITY OF INHIBITION BY PHOSPHONATE ESTERS OF THE FIRST COMPONENT OF COMPLEMENT AND THE ANTIGEN-INDUCED RELEASE OF HISTAMINE FROM GUINEA PIG LUNG. J Exp Med. 1964 Oct 1;120:491–506. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.4.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BENACERRAF B., OVARY Z., BLOCH K. J., FRANKLIN E. C. Properties of guinea pig 7S antibodies. I. Electrophoretic separation of two types of guinea pig 7S antibodies. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:937–949. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BINAGHI R. A., BENACERRAF B., BLOCH K. J., KOURILSKY F. M. PROPERTIES OF RAT ANAPHYLACTIC ANTIBODY. J Immunol. 1964 Jun;92:927–933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. BINAGHI R. A., BENACERRAF B. THE PRODUCTION OF ANAPHYLACTIC ANTIBODY IN THE RAT. J Immunol. 1964 Jun;92:920–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. BLOCH K. J., KOURILSKY F. M., OVARY Z., BENACERRAF B. Properties of guinea pig 7S antibodies. III. Identification of antibodies involved in complement fixation and hemolysis. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:965–981. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. BLOCH K. J., OVARY Z., KOURILSKY F. M., BENACERRAF B. PROPERTIES OF GUINEA PIG 7S ANTIBODIES. VI. TRANSMISSION OF ANTIBODIES FROM MATERNAL TO FETAL CIRCULATION. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1963 Oct;114:79–82. doi: 10.3181/00379727-114-28591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. BOONE B. J., BECKER E. L., CANHAM D. H. ENZYME INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF CERTAIN PHOSPHONATE ESTERS AGAINST CHYMOTRYPSIN, TRYPSIN AND ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Jun 1;85:441–445. doi: 10.1016/0926-6569(64)90308-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUMPHREY J. H., AUSTEN K. F., RAPP H. J. In vitro studies of reversed anaphylaxis with rat cells. Immunology. 1963 May;6:226–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LAGUNOFF D., BENDITT E. P. Proteolytic enzymes of mast cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1963 Feb 26;103:185–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb53698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MONGAR J. L., SCHILD H. O. Inhibition of the anaphylactic reaction. J Physiol. 1957 Feb 15;135(2):301–319. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MOTA I. Effect of antigen and octylamine on mast cells and histamine content of sensitized guinea-pig tissues. J Physiol. 1959 Oct;147:425–436. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MOTA I., ISHIT T. Inhibition of mast cell disruption and histamine release in rat anaphylaxis in vitro. Comparison with compound 48/80. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1960 Mar;15:82–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1960.tb01213.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MOTA I., da SILVA W. Antigen-induced damage to isolated sensitized mast cells. Nature. 1960 Apr 16;186:245–246. doi: 10.1038/186245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. OSLER A. G., HAWRISIAK M. M., OVARY Z., SIQUEIRA M., BIER O. G. Studies on the mechanism of hypersensitivity phenomena. II. The participation of complement in passive cutaneous anaphylaxis of the albino rat. J Exp Med. 1957 Dec 1;106(6):811–834. doi: 10.1084/jem.106.6.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PERERA B. A., MONGAR J. L. THE ROLE IN ANAPHYLAXIS OF A CHYMOTRYPSIN-LIKE ENZYME IN RAT MAST CELLS. Immunology. 1963 Sep;6:478–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WHITE R. G., JENKINS G. C., WILKINSON P. C. The production of skin-sensitizing antibody in the guinea-pig. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1963;22:156–165. doi: 10.1159/000229362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES