Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1966 Oct 31;124(5):851–858. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.851

FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY OF THE LYMPHOCYTE IN IMMUNOLOGICAL REACTIONS IN VITRO

William McFarland 1, Dorothy H Heilman 1, John F Moorhead 1
PMCID: PMC2138262  PMID: 5926299

Abstract

The motile lymphocyte in vitro has a prominent "tail" that becomes a means of "attachment" to other cells and debris during interaction. The term "uropod" is proposed to designate this specialized cytoplasmic projection which appears totally different, anatomically and functionally, from the pseudopods. Observations of lymphoblasts during mitosis indicate that the uropod is formed immediately following mitosis at the point of final cytoplasmic connection between daughter cells, a fact that may prove significant as lymphocyte function is better understood. In the mixed leukocyte reaction the lymphocyte interacts with macrophages, cell debris, and lymphoblasts via the uropod, suggesting that stimulatory material may be acquired through this specialized appendage. Lymphoblast-lymphocyte interaction is noteworthy and implies that immunologically committed cells may be mustered through horizontal as well as vertical processes: horizontally by lymphoblast-lymphocyte interaction and vertically by mitosis of transformed lymphoblasts. The possible relevance of these in vitro observations to lymphocyte functions in vivo is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (639.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASKONAS B. A., RHODES J. M. IMMUNOGENICITY OF ANTIGEN-CONTAINING RIBONUCLEIC ACID PREPARATIONS FROM MACROPHAGES. Nature. 1965 Jan 30;205:470–474. doi: 10.1038/205470a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAIN B., VAS M. R., LOWENSTEIN L. THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE IMMATURE MONONUCLEAR CELLS IN MIXED LEUKOCYTE CULTURES. Blood. 1964 Jan;23:108–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FISHMAN M., ADLER F. L. Antibody formation initiated in vitro. II. Antibody synthesis in x-irradiated recipients of diffusion chambers containing nucleic acid derived from macrophages incubated with antigen. J Exp Med. 1963 Apr 1;117:595–602. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.4.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUMBLE J. G., JAYNE W. H., PULVERTAFT R. J. Biological interaction between lymphocytes and other cells. Br J Haematol. 1956 Jul;2(3):283–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1956.tb06700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris G. Studies of the mechanism of antigen stimulation of DNA synthesis in rabbit spleen cultures. Immunology. 1965 Dec;9(6):529–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MCFARLAND W., HEILMAN D. H. LYMPHOCYTE FOOT APPENDAGE: ITS ROLE IN LYMPHOCYTE FUNCTION AND IN IMMUNOLOGICAL REACTIONS. Nature. 1965 Feb 27;205:887–888. doi: 10.1038/205887a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES