Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1966 Oct 31;124(5):885–900. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.885

ALLOANTIBODY PRODUCTION MEASURED BY PLAQUE ASSAY IN RELATION TO STRONG AND WEAK HISTOINCOMPATIBILITY

W H Hildemann 1, W Pinkerton 1
PMCID: PMC2138269  PMID: 5332755

Abstract

A plaque technique which provides a sensitive and quantitative determination of allohemolysin (isohemolysin) production by lymphoid cells of mice and Syrian hamsters is described. Much ongoing attention has been given to minimizing sources of spurious plaques while improving the reproducibility of the technique. Primary intravenous immunization with allogeneic blood cells led to the early appearance of plaque-forming spleen cells responding to both strong and weak histocompatibility antigens in inbred strains of mice. The strongest histoincompatibility (A/J → BL/6), characterized by H-2 plus non-H-2 differences and a median skin allograft survival time of 8.2 ± 0.5 days, gave a peak average plaque production of 29.6 per 10 x 106 viable spleen cells after 6 days. At the other extreme with an average allograft survival time of 91 days, C3H(H-1a) → C3H.K(H-1b) showed a feeble production of plaque-forming cells with a peak response of 3.7 per 10 x 106 viable spleen cells at 9 days. Histocompatibility antigens determined by genes at the H-1, H-Y, and H-X loci were demonstrated to be erythrocyte antigens as well. Peak plaque production occurred earlier and reached higher levels across the stronger histocompatibility barriers (H-2 plus non-H-2 or H-2 alone) in temporal accord with the rapidity of skin allograft rejection. Weak H-Y or H-1 differences leading to prolonged allograft survival were associated with moderate, but not commensurate delays in the initial occurrence and recruitment of plaque-forming cells. With one exception (C57BL/10 → B10.A), the average plaque counts found at the peak of the primary responses were inversely proportional to the median survival times of skin allografts in the same strain combinations. Nevertheless, in light of the disparity between the times of allograft rejection and the time course of appearance of plaque-forming cells with the "weaker" congenic combinations, the early 19S antibodies do not appear to be directly involved in allograft rejection. There appears to be no limitation in the weakness of histocompatibility antigens capable of evoking antibodies detectible by plaque assay. The extent to which molecular species of mouse antibodies other than 19S hemolysins are induced and detected under the conditions employed remains to be determined. The responses in strain combinations involving stronger histocompatibility barriers were characterized by exponential increases in plaque-forming cells, for 2 to 4 days until maximal levels were reached. Repeated immunization in several trials led to substantial increases over the maximum primary response in the number of demonstrable plaque-forming cells. Further preliminary results are reported concerning alloimmune plaque production in three strains of Syrian hamsters exhibiting intermediate to weak histocompatibility differences.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADLER F. L. STUDIES ON MOUSE ANTIBODIES. I. THE RESPONSE TO SHEEP RED CELLS. J Immunol. 1965 Jul;95:26–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., HILDEMANN W. H. Studies on the immunological responses of hamsters to skin homografts. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Dec 4;149(935):216–233. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BORAKER D. K., HILDEMANN W. H. MATURATION OF ALLOIMMUNE RESPONSIVENESS IN MICE. Transplantation. 1965 Mar;3:202–223. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196503000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barth W. F., McLaughlin C. L., Fahey J. L. The immunoglobulins of mice. VI. Response to immunization. J Immunol. 1965 Nov;95(5):781–790. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Graff R. J., Hildemann W. H., Snell G. D. Histocompatibility genes of mice. VI. Allografts in mice congenic at various non-H-2 histocompatibility loci. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):425–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HILDEMANN W. H., PETERS R. S., THAXTER T. H. Stepwise increase in transplantation immunity as a function of cumulative cell dosage. Transplant Bull. 1960 Jul;26:154–158. doi: 10.1097/00006534-196007000-00053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LITCHFIELD J. T., Jr A method for rapid graphic solution of time-per cent effect curves. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1949 Dec;97(4):399-408, 3 tab. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nakano M., Braun W. Fluctuation tests with antibody-forming spleen cell populations. Science. 1966 Jan 21;151(3708):338–340. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3708.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SNELL G. D., STEVENS L. C. Histocompatibility genes of mice. III. H-1 and H-4, two histocompatibility loci in the first linkage group. Immunology. 1961 Oct;4:366–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES