Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1967 Jun 1;125(6):967–981. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.6.967

PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE IN GRAFTED CELLS

DISSOCIATION BETWEEN THE PROLIFERATION OF ACTIVITY AND THE PROLIFERATION OF CELLS

Norman W Nisbet 1, Morten Simonsen 1
PMCID: PMC2138282  PMID: 6025322

Abstract

The primary immune response elicited by host antigens in a grafted population of immunologically competent cells has been compared in conditions where the same dose of parental cells were grafted simultaneously to F1 hybrid embryos of 13 or 17 days of age. The enlarged chimeric spleens harvested 4 days later were analyzed for donor cell proliferation by using the sex chromosomes as karyological markers, and for proliferation of immunological activity by means of transfer to secondary hosts of the same genotype. Whereas the total number of dividing donor cells were on the average 16 times higher in 17-day than in 13-day hosts, the recovery of immunological reactivity showed a 6- to 7-fold difference in the opposite direction. The experiments cast doubt on the proposition that cellular proliferation is necessary for development of a primary immune response. They suggest that there exists an alternative way in which a primary immune response may unfold from involving a few to involving a much larger number of cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (868.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BIGGS P. M., PAYNE L. N. Cytological identification of proliferating donor cells in chick embryos injected with adult chicken blood. Nature. 1959 Nov 14;184(Suppl 20):1594–1594. doi: 10.1038/1841594a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ISACSON P. Cellular transfer of antibody production from adult to embryo in domestic fowls. Yale J Biol Med. 1959 Dec;32:209–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. JAFFE W. P., PAYNE L. N. The genetic basis for the graft-against-host reaction between inbred lines of fowls. Differences between the Reaseheath C and I inbred lines. Immunology. 1962 May;5:399–413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MCDERMID E. M. IMMUNOGENETICS OF THE CHICKEN. A REVIEW. Vox Sang. 1964 May-Jun;9:249–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1964.tb02615.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Owen J. J., Moore M. A., Harrison G. A. Chromosome marker studies in the graft-versus-host reaction in the chick embryo. Nature. 1965 Jul 17;207(994):313–315. doi: 10.1038/207313b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SCHIERMAN L. W., NORDSKOG A. W. Influence of the B bloodgroup-histocompatibility locus in chickens on a graft-versus-host reaction. Nature. 1963 Feb 2;197:511–512. doi: 10.1038/197511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SETO F., ALBRIGHT J. F. AN ANALYSIS OF HOST AND DONOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO SPLENIC ENLARGEMENT IN CHICK EMBRYOS INOCULATED WITH ADULT CHICKEN SPLEEN CELLS. Dev Biol. 1965 Feb;11:1–24. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(65)90035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SIMONSEN M. RECENT EXPERIMENTS ON THE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST REACTION IN THE CHICK EMBRYO. Br Med Bull. 1965 May;21:129–132. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SOLOMON J. B., TUCKER D. F. Immunological attack by adult cells in the developing chick embryo: influence of the vascularity of the host spleen and of homograft rejection by the embryo on splenomegaly. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1963 Mar;11:119–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. WARREN L. G., BORSOS T. Studies on immune factors occurring in sera of chickens against the crithidia stage of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Immunol. 1959 Jun;82(6):585–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES