Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1967 Jul 1;126(1):127–148. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.1.127

THE INFLUENCE OF ANTIBODIES ON IMMUNOLOGIC RESPONSES

I. THE EFFECT ON THE RESPONSE TO PARTICULATE ANTIGEN IN THE RABBIT

David S Pearlman 1
PMCID: PMC2138303  PMID: 6027643

Abstract

The influence of antibody on antibody formation to particulate antigen was examined in the rabbit with special reference to the importance of immunoglobulin type, the amount and relative proportion of antigen and antibody involved, and the specificity of this influence. 19S as well as 7S antibody was shown to be an effective inhibitor of antibody formation, although there was some evidence that 7S antibody was the more efficient of the two in doing so. The inhibitory effect of antibody was found to be specific for homologous antigenic determinants. Both 19S and 7S antibody were also able to enhance antibody formation. In contrast to the suppressive phenomenon, however, enhancement appeared to be nonspecific since antibody reactive with homologous (sheep red blood cell) determinants could enhance the response not only to homologous determinants but to heterologous (dinitrobenzene) determinants conjugated to the red blood cells as well. Smaller amounts of antibody were needed to enhance than to suppress antibody formation, and suppression and enhancement depended to some extent on the amount of antigen as well as to the amount of antibody used. The enhancing and suppressing influence of antibody on antibody formation appeared to be exerted concomitantly, for the response to some antigenic determinants was sometimes suppressed at the same time that the response to others was enhanced. It is suggested that enhancement or suppression of immunologic responses by antibody represents a different balance of at least two competing factors operating together: specific neutralization of appropriate determinants thus decreasing the total effective concentration of these determinants available to stimulate the formation of antibodies, and a nonspecific increase in the availability of antigen to immunologically competent cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boyden S. V. Natural antibodies and the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1966;5:1–28. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60271-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COHEN C., ALLTON W. H., Jr Iso-immunization in the rabbit with antibody-coated erythrocytes. Nature. 1962 Mar 10;193:990–992. doi: 10.1038/193990a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EISEN H. N., CARSTEN M. E., BELMAN S. Studies of hypersensitivity to low molecular weight substances. III. The 2,4-dinitrophenyl group as a determinant in the preciptin reaction. J Immunol. 1954 Nov;73(5):296–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. EISEN H. N., KERN M., NEWTON W. T., HELMREICH E. A study of the distribution of 2,4-dinitrobenzene sensitizers between isolated lymph node cells and extracellular medium in relation to induction of contact skin sensitivity. J Exp Med. 1959 Aug 1;110(2):187–206. doi: 10.1084/jem.110.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FINKELSTEIN M. S., UHR J. W. SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF ANTIBODY FORMATION BY PASSIVELY ADMINISTERED 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY. Science. 1964 Oct 2;146(3640):67–69. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3640.67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FINN R., CLARKE C. A., DONOHOE W. T., McCONNELL R. B., SHEPPARD P. M., LEHANE D., KULKE W. Experimental studies on the prevention of Rh haemolytic disease. Br Med J. 1961 May 27;1(5238):1486–1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5238.1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FRETER G. G., TALMAGE D. W., THOMSON A. The effect of whole body x radiation on the specific anamnestic response in the rabbit. J Infect Dis. 1956 Nov-Dec;99(3):246–252. doi: 10.1093/infdis/99.3.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GREY H. M. STUDIES ON CHANGES IN THE QUALITY OF RABBIT-BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN ANTIBODY FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION. Immunology. 1964 Jan;7:82–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jerne N. K. THE NATURAL-SELECTION THEORY OF ANTIBODY FORMATION. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Nov 15;41(11):849–857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.41.11.849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LESKOWITZ S. Studies in immunization. II. Immunization with specific precipitates. J Immunol. 1960 Jul;85:56–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MOLLER G., WIGZELL H. ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL. ANTIBODY-INDUCED SUPPRESSION OF 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY RESPONSE. J Exp Med. 1965 Jun 1;121:969–989. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.6.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McConahey P. J., Dixon F. J. A method of trace iodination of proteins for immunologic studies. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;29(2):185–189. doi: 10.1159/000229699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell J., Nossal G. J. Mechanism of induction of immunological tolerance. I. Localization of tolerance-inducing antigen. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1966 Jun;44(3):211–223. doi: 10.1038/icb.1966.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. NEIDERS M. E., ROWLEY D. A., FITCH F. W. The sustained suppression of hemolysin response in passively immunized rats. J Immunol. 1962 Jun;88:718–724. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. ONOUE K., YAGI Y., PRESSMAN D. MULTIPLICITY OF ANTIBODY PROTEINS IN RABBIT ANTI-P-AZOBENZENEARSONATE SERA. J Immunol. 1964 Feb;92:173–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PEARLMAN D. S., SAUERS J. B., TALMAGE D. W. THE EFFECT OF ADJUVANT AMOUNTS OF ENDOTOXINS ON THE SERUM HEMOLYTIC COMPLEMENT ACTIVITY IN RABBITS. J Immunol. 1963 Dec;91:748–756. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. ROBBINS J. B., KENNY K., SUTER E. THE ISOLATION AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES OF RABBIT GAMMA M- AND GAMMA G-ANTI-SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM ANTIBODIES. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:385–402. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SAHIAR K., SCHWARTZ R. S. INHIBITION OF 19S ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS BY 7S ANTIBODY. Science. 1964 Jul 24;145(3630):395–397. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3630.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. SEGRE D., KAEBERLE M. L. The immunologic behavior of baby pigs. I. Production of antibodies in three-week-old pigs. J Immunol. 1962 Dec;89:782–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. STONER R. D., TERRES G. ENHANCED ANTITOXIN RESPONSES IN IRRADIATED MICE ELICITED BY COMPLEXES OF TETANUS TOXOID AND SPECIFIC ANTIBODY. J Immunol. 1963 Dec;91:761–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. TALIAFERRO W. H., TALIAFERRO L. G. The dynamics of hemolysin formation in intact and splenectomized rabbits. J Infect Dis. 1950 Jul-Aug;87(1):37–62. doi: 10.1093/infdis/87.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TALIAFERRO W. H., TALMAGE D. W. Antibodies in the rabbit with different rates of metabolic decay. J Infect Dis. 1956 Jul-Aug;99(1):21–33. doi: 10.1093/infdis/99.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TALMAGE D. W., FRETER G. G., TALIAFERRO W. H. Two antibodies of related specificity but different hemolytic efficiency separated by centrifugation. J Infect Dis. 1956 May-Jun;98(3):300–305. doi: 10.1093/infdis/98.3.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TALMAGE D. W., FRETER G. G. The blocking of labeled antibody uptake as a measure of the relative combining capacity of anti-red cell serums. J Infect Dis. 1956 May-Jun;98(3):277–292. doi: 10.1093/infdis/98.3.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. TERRES G., WOLINS W. Enhanced sensitization in mice by simultaneous injection of antigen and specific rabbit antiserum. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1959 Oct-Dec;102:632–635. doi: 10.3181/00379727-102-25342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Talmage D. W., Pearlman D. S. The antibody response: a model based on antagonistic actions of antigen. J Theor Biol. 1963 Sep;5(2):321–339. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90067-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tao T. W., Uhr J. W. Capacity of pepsin-digested antibody to inhibit antibody formation. Nature. 1966 Oct 8;212(5058):208–209. doi: 10.1038/212208a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. I. The suppression of antibody formation by passively administered antibody. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:935–957. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. II. The specific anamnestic antibody response. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:959–970. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WEIGLE W. O., DIXON F. J. The antibody response of lymph node cells transferred to tolerant recipients. J Immunol. 1959 Jun;82(6):516–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES