Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1967 Mar 31;125(4):721–736. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.4.721

CYTOTOXIC POTENTIAL OF STIMULATED HUMAN LYMPHOCYTES

Göran Holm 1, Peter Perlmann 1
PMCID: PMC2138361  PMID: 6020009

Abstract

Viable and immunologically competent lymphocytes from unsensitized donors damage allogeneic tissue culture cells in the presence of phytohemagglutinin (PHA). This cytotoxicity is specific since syngeneic tissue culture cells are not at all or only slightly damaged under similar experimental conditions. In this investigation, the relation between the stimulation of human lymphocytes and their cytotoxicity was studied. Chang cells (human liver) served as target cells in all experiments. Cell damage was quantitated by measuring the release of isotope from target cells labeled with chromate-51Cr. The cytotoxicity of the lymphocytes was dependent on the concentration of PHA in the incubation medium. Cell damage was maximal at concentrations of 4–8 µl PHA/ml. Higher concentrations were inhibitory although aggregation was increased and no injury of the lymphocytes was noted. Stimulation of DNA and RNA synthesis in PHA-treated lymphocytes each followed dose response curves which were similar to that of cytotoxicity. In order to establish whether stimulation without mixed aggregation of lymphocytes and target cells would suffice for cytotoxicity, a series of nonagglutinating stimulants were investigated. Lymphocytes pretreated with a crude filtrate of Staphylococcus aureus for periods of 0.5–72 hr damaged Chang cells even in the absence of PHA. Lymphocytes from a tuberculin-positive donor were strongly cytotoxic after prestimulation with PPD while those from a negative donor were inactive. Moreover, strong cytotoxic effects were also obtained with lymphocytes which had been stimulated by preincubation with allogeneic lymphocytes in mixed culture. When two stimulants were applied at the same time, additive cytotoxic effects were seen. Addition of PHA to the lymphocyte/Chang cell mixtures potentiated the cytotoxicity of prestimulated lymphocytes. The cytotoxic potential of the lymphocytes was in all cases correlated to the degree of stimulation recorded as transformation into blast cells, and was independent both of the degree of aggregation and of the stimulating factor. These findings are compatible with the assumption that injury of the Chang cells reflected an immunologically nonspecific activity of lymphocytes enhanced by stimulation. The possible importance of this activity for a number of tissue-damaging immune reactions in vivo is pointed out.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (828.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAIN B., VAS M. R., LOWENSTEIN L. THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE IMMATURE MONONUCLEAR CELLS IN MIXED LEUKOCYTE CULTURES. Blood. 1964 Jan;23:108–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Tissue transplantation: a new approach to the "typing" problem. Br Med J. 1963 Aug 3;2(5352):269–272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5352.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CHAPMAN N. D., DUTTON R. W. THE STIMULATION OF DNA SYNTHESIS IN CULTURES OF RABBIT LYMPH NODE AND SPLEEN CELL SUSPENSIONS BY HOMOLOGOUS CELLS. J Exp Med. 1965 Jan 1;121:85–100. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COULSON A. S., CHALMERS D. G. SEPARATION OF VIABLE LYMPHOCYTES FROM HUMAN BLOOD. Lancet. 1964 Feb 29;1(7331):468–469. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)90799-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. COWLING D. C., QUAGLINO D., DAVIDSON E. CHANGES INDUCED BY TUBERCULIN IN LEUCOCYTE CULTURES. Lancet. 1963 Nov 23;2(7317):1091–1094. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)92860-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. EAGLE H. Amino acid metabolism in mammalian cell cultures. Science. 1959 Aug 21;130(3373):432–437. doi: 10.1126/science.130.3373.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HIRSCHHORN K., BACH F., KOLODNY R. L., FIRSCHEIN I. L., HASHEM N. IMMUNE RESPONSE AND MITOSIS OF HUMAN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES IN VITRO. Science. 1963 Nov 29;142(3596):1185–1187. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3596.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOLM G., PERLMANN P., WERNER B. PHYTOHAEMAGGLUTININ-INDUCED CYTOTOXIC ACTION OF NORMAL LYMPHOID CELLS ON CELLS IN TISSUE CULTURE. Nature. 1964 Aug 22;203:841–843. doi: 10.1038/203841a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harris G., Littleton R. J. The effects of antigens and of phytohemagglutinin on rabbit spleen cell suspensions. J Exp Med. 1966 Oct 1;124(4):621–634. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.4.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holm G., Perlmann P. Phytohaemagglutinin-induced cytotoxic action of unsensitized immunologically competent cells on allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue culture cells. Nature. 1965 Aug 21;207(999):818–821. doi: 10.1038/207818a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holm G., Perlmann P. Quantitative studies on phytohaemagglutinin-induced cytotoxicity by human lymphocytes against homologous cells in tissue culture. Immunology. 1967 May;12(5):525–536. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LING N. R., HUSBAND E. M. SPECIFIC AND NON-SPECIFIC STIMULATION OF PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTES. Lancet. 1964 Feb 15;1(7329):363–365. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(64)92102-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LING N. R., SPICER E., JAMES K., WILLIAMSON N. THE ACTIVATION OF HUMAN PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTES BY PRODUCTS OF STAPHYLOCOCCI. Br J Haematol. 1965 Jul;11:421–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1965.tb06604.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MACKINNEY A. A., Jr, STOHLMAN F., Jr, BRECHER G. The kinetics of cell proliferation in cultures of human peripheral blood. Blood. 1962 Mar;19:349–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MOELLER E. CONTACT-INDUCED CYTOTOXICITY BY LYMPHOID CELLS CONTAINING FOREIGN ISOANTIGENS. Science. 1965 Feb 19;147(3660):873–879. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3660.873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mueller G. C., Mahieu M. L. Induction of ribonucleic acid synthesis in human leucocytes by phytohemagglutinin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Jan 18;114(1):100–107. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(66)90257-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. OPPENHEIM J. J., WHANG J., FREI E., 3rd IMMUNOLOGIC AND CYTOGENETIC STUDIES OF CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIC CELLS. Blood. 1965 Aug;26:121–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PEARMAIN G., LYCETTE R. R., FITZGERALD P. H. Tuberculin-induced mitosis in peripheral blood leucocytes. Lancet. 1963 Mar 23;1(7282):637–638. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(63)91275-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RIGAS D. A., JOHNSON E. A. STUDIES ON THE PHYTOHEMAGGLUTININ OF PHASEOLUS VULGARIS AND ITS MITOGENICITY. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Feb 28;113:800–818. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb40705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rapaport F. T., Chase R. M., Jr The bacterial induction of homograft sensitivity. II. Effects of sensitization with staphylococci and other microoorganisms. J Exp Med. 1965 Oct 1;122(4):733–744. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.4.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES