Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1968 Jan 31;127(2):307–325. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.2.307

THE X-Y-Z SCHEME OF IMMUNOCYTE MATURATION

IV. THE EXHAUSTION OF MEMORY CELLS

Vera S Byers 1, Eli E Sercarz 1
PMCID: PMC2138441  PMID: 5635381

Abstract

A set of conditions has been described under which primed rabbit lymph nodes produce a secondary antibody response upon in vivo stimulation with a large dose of antigen, but are subsequently "exhausted;" that is, lymph node cultures prepared at intervals following the booster injection cannot be re-stimulated to display tertiary responses. Rabbits given 100-fold less antigen in the booster inoculum were able to give a tertiary response upon in vitro challenge. The system used permits neither induction nor continuation of a primary response to BSA in vitro. Since it could be demonstrated that no memory cells were generated by the booster injection within the intervals between in vivo injection and culture, the tertiary response in nonexhausted nodes must have been due to residual memory cells which remained untriggered by the in vivo booster injection. The unresponsive state was not caused by antibody feedback. These results are interpreted to mean that a population of memory cells can be exhausted by a supraoptimal dose of antigen, rendering the node temporarily incapable of further response. This implies that long-lived memory is not due to asymmetric division of memory cells. The source and fate of memory cells is discussed with regard to this evidence.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (914.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMBROSE C. T. THE REQUIREMENT FOR HYDROCORTISONE IN ANTIBODY-FORMING TISSUE CULTIVATED IN SERUM-FREE MEDIUM. J Exp Med. 1964 Jan 1;119:1027–1049. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.6.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BOYDEN S. V. The adsorption of proteins on erythrocytes treated with tannic acid and subsequent hemagglutination by antiprotein sera. J Exp Med. 1951 Feb;93(2):107–120. doi: 10.1084/jem.93.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DORNER M. M., UHR J. W. IMMUNOLOGIC TOLERANCE AFTER SPECIFIC IMMUNIZATION. J Exp Med. 1964 Sep 1;120:435–447. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.3.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DRESSER D. W. Specific inhibition of antibody production. II. Paralysis induced in adult mice by small quantities of protein antigen. Immunology. 1962 May;5:378–388. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dixon F. J., Jacot-Guillarmod H., McConahey P. J. The effect of passively administered antibody on antibody synthesis. J Exp Med. 1967 Jun 1;125(6):1119–1135. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.6.1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hege J. S., Cole L. J. Antibody plaque-forming cells: kinetics of primary and secondary responses. J Immunol. 1966 Apr;96(4):559–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LESKOWITZ S. Studies in immunization. II. Immunization with specific precipitates. J Immunol. 1960 Jul;85:56–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MICHAELIDES M. C., COONS A. H. Studies on antibody production. V. The secondary response in vitro. J Exp Med. 1963 Jun 1;117:1035–1051. doi: 10.1084/jem.117.6.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MILLER J. J., 3rd AN AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF PLASMA CELL AND LYMPHOCYTE SURVIVAL IN RAT POPLITEAL LYMPH NODES. J Immunol. 1964 May;92:673–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MOLLER G., WIGZELL H. ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL. ANTIBODY-INDUCED SUPPRESSION OF 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY RESPONSE. J Exp Med. 1965 Jun 1;121:969–989. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.6.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ROWLEY D. A., FITCH F. W. HOMEOSTASIS OF ANTIBODY FORMATION IN THE ADULT RAT. J Exp Med. 1964 Dec 1;120:987–1005. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.6.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ROWLEY D. A., FITCH F. W. THE MECHANISM OF TOLERANCE PRODUCED IN RATS TO SHEEP ERYTHROCYTES. I. PLAQUE-FORMING CELL AND ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO SINGLE AND MULTIPLE INJECTIONS OF ANTIGEN. J Exp Med. 1965 May 1;121:671–681. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.5.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SEVER J. L. Application of a microtechnique to viral serological investigations. J Immunol. 1962 Mar;88:320–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. STERZL J., TRNKA Z. Effect of very large doses of bacterial antigen on antibody production in newborn rabbits. Nature. 1957 May 4;179(4566):918–919. doi: 10.1038/179918a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sterzl J., Silverstein A. M. Developmental aspects of immunity. Adv Immunol. 1967;6:337–459. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60525-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. TALIAFERRO W. H., TALIAFERRO L. G. The role of the spleen in hemolysin production in rabbits receiving multiple antigen injections. J Infect Dis. 1951 Sep-Oct;89(2):143–168. doi: 10.1093/infdis/89.2.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. TALMAGE D. W., FRETER G. G., TALIAFERRO W. H. The effect of repeated injections of sheep red cells on the hemolytic and combining capacities of rabbit antiserums. J Infect Dis. 1956 May-Jun;98(3):293–299. doi: 10.1093/infdis/98.3.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. TAO T. W. PHYTOHEMAGGLUTININ ELICITATION OF SPECIFIC ANAMNESTIC IMMUNE RESPONSE IN VITRO. Science. 1964 Oct 9;146(3641):247–248. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3641.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Terres G., Morrison S. L. Enhanced immunologic sensitization of mice by the simultaneous injection of antigen and specific antiserum. 3. The role of antigen in controlling the immune response elicited with immune complexes. J Immunol. 1967 Mar;98(3):584–592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. UHR J. W. THE HETEROGENEITY OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Science. 1964 Jul 31;145(3631):457–464. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3631.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vischer T. L., Stastny P. Time of appearance and distribution of cells capable of secondary immune response following primary immunization. Immunology. 1967 Jun;12(6):675–687. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wigzell H. Antibody synthesis at the cellular level. Antibody-induced suppression of 7S antibody synthesis. J Exp Med. 1966 Nov 1;124(5):953–969. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES