Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):197–221. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.197

THE ROLE OF AFFERENT LYMPHATICS IN THE REJECTION OF SKIN HOMOGRAFTS

Clyde F Barker 1, R E Billingham 1
PMCID: PMC2138504  PMID: 4873840

Abstract

Experiments have been carried out on guinea pigs of two isogenic strains to elucidate the role of afferent lymphatic vessels in the rejection of orthotopic skin homografts. Graft beds were prepared in partially isolated skin flaps with an intact sustaining vascular "umbilical cord" in which a lymphatic connection with the host could be retained or abolished at will. In the absence of demonstrable lymphatic connections between flap and host, intra-flap homografts long outlived similar grafts transplanted to conventional sites in intact skin and, rather than being specifically rejected, died as a consequence of ischemic necrosis of the flap. When lymphatic drainage was retained, intra-flap homografts were rejected in the usual manner. Hosts of long-term intra-flap homografts did not develop sensitivity, as evidenced by the "first set" type rejection of subsequent test grafts, or by the long-term survival of a second skin graft transplanted to a new flap raised on the opposite side of the host's body. Intra-flap skin homografts were rejected if (a) the hosts had been presensitized, (b) they were grafted concomitantly with a skin homograft placed in a conventional site, or inoculated with a suspension of donor lymphoid cells, or (c) if the lymphatic drainage was restored by reimplantation of the hitherto partially isolated flap to an appropriate vascular bed. These findings and others indicate that an intact lymphatic drainage in its bed is essential for an orthotopic skin homograft to sensitize its host. Various experiments were carried out in which intra-flap homografts were used as "indicators" for the acquisition of specific active or adoptive immunity by their hosts. By transplanting skin homografts to conventional beds concomitantly with intra-flap grafts and then excising the former at various intervals, it has been found that a graft must be in residence for a minimum period of 4 days to evoke the development of a detectable level of sensitivity in the host. Furthermore, by replacing either freshly prepared or long-term skin flaps bearing skin homografts in vascular beds on the trunk and determining the subsequent survival times of the homografts, evidence has been obtained suggesting that reestablishment of a functional lymphatic system in a free skin graft may take as long as 9 days. Using intra-flap homografts as indicators of adoptive immunization of the host, we found that as few as 50 x 106 isologous peripheral blood leukocytes from a specifically sensitized animal will transfer an effective level of sensitivity. We also found that hyperimmune serum, in relatively large amount, exerts a weak but definite adverse effect upon either freshly or recently transplanted intra-flap grafts.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BILLINGHAM R. E., BRENT L., BROWN J. B., MEDAWAR P. B. Time of onset and duration of transplantation immunity. Transplant Bull. 1959 Oct;6:410–414. doi: 10.1097/00006534-195910000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., SILVERS W. K. The melanocytes of mammals. Q Rev Biol. 1960 Mar;35:1–40. doi: 10.1086/402951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BILLINGHAM R. E., SILVERS W. K., WILSON D. B. FURTHER STUDIES ON ADOPTIVE TRANSFER OF SENSITIVITY TO SKIN HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1963 Sep 1;118:397–420. doi: 10.1084/jem.118.3.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. The role of regional lymphatics in the skin homograft response. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):962–966. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707001-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Billingham R. E., Silvers W. K. Re-investigation of the possible occurrence of maternally induced tolerance in guinea pigs. J Exp Zool. 1965 Nov;160(2):221–224. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401600209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brent L., Medawar P. B. Cellular immunity and the homograft reaction. Br Med Bull. 1967 Jan;23(1):55–60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chanana A. D., Brecher G., Cronkite E. P., Joel D., Schnappauf H. The influence of extracorporeal irradiation of the blood and lymph on skin homograft rejection. Radiat Res. 1966 Mar;27(3):330–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FREY J. R., WENK P. Experimental studies on the pathogenesis of contact eczema in the guinea-pig. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1957;11(1-2):81–100. doi: 10.1159/000228405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HENRY L., DAMMIN G. J. Time and dose relationships in the development of immunity to skin homografts in mice. J Immunol. 1962 Dec;89:841–848. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUME D. M., EGDAHL R. H. Progressive destruction of renal homografts isolated from the regional lymphatics of the host. Surgery. 1955 Jul;38(1):194–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hall J. G. Studies of the cells in the afferent and efferent lymph of lymph nodes draining the site of skin homografts. J Exp Med. 1967 May 1;125(5):737–754. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.5.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hudack S. S., McMaster P. D. THE LYMPHATIC PARTICIPATION IN HUMAN CUTANEOUS PHENOMENA : A STUDY OF THE MINUTE LYMPHATICS OF THE LIVING SKIN. J Exp Med. 1933 Apr 30;57(5):751–774. doi: 10.1084/jem.57.5.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LAMBERT P. B., FRANK H. A. BELLMAN S, FARNSWORTH D: THE ROLE OF THE LYMPH TRUNKS IN THE RESPONSE TO ALLOGENEIC SKIN TRANSPLANTS. Transplantation. 1965 Jan;3:62–73. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196501000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LITCHFIELD J. T., Jr A method for rapid graphic solution of time-per cent effect curves. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1949 Dec;97(4):399-408, 3 tab. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lance E. M. A functional and morphologic study of intracranial thyroid allografts in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 Sep;125(3):529–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MURRAY J. E., SHEIL A. G., MOSELEY R., KNIGHT P., MCGAVIC J. D., DAMMIN G. J. ANALYSIS OF MECHANISM OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE DRUGS IN RENAL HOMOTRANSPLANTATION. Ann Surg. 1964 Sep;160:449–473. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196409000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKhann C. F., Berrian J. H. Transplantation Immunity: Some Properties of Induction and Expression. Ann Surg. 1959 Dec;150(6):1025–1031. doi: 10.1097/00000658-195912000-00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McMaster P. D., Hudack S. S. THE PARTICIPATION OF SKIN LYMPHATICS IN REPAIR OF THE LESIONS DUE TO INCISIONS AND BURNS. J Exp Med. 1934 Sep 30;60(4):479–501. doi: 10.1084/jem.60.4.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. NATHAN P. ANTIGEN RELEASE FROM THE TRANSPLANTED DOG KIDNEY. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Nov 30;120:458–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb34745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. SCOTHORNE R. J. Lymphatic repair and the genesis of homograft immunity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1958 Oct 7;73(3):673–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb40843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. STROBER S., GOWANS J. L. THE ROLE OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE SENSITIZATION OF RATS TO RENAL HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:347–360. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Turk J. L. Lymphocyte response to antigens. A. Afferent side of sensitization arc. Response of lymphocytes to antigens. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):952–961. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707001-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. WOODRUFF M. F. Cellular and humoral factors in the immunity to skin homografts: experiments with a porous membrane. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1957 Mar 22;64(5):1014-26; discussion, 1026-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb52493.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wilson D. B., Billingham R. E. Lymphocytes and transplantation immunity. Adv Immunol. 1967;7:189–273. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60129-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES