Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1968 Oct 31;128(5):1157–1181. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1157

QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON THE MIXED LYMPHOCYTE INTERACTION IN RATS

III. KINETICS OF THE RESPONSE

Darcy B Wilson 1, Janet L Blyth 1, Peter C Nowell 1
PMCID: PMC2138568  PMID: 5682942

Abstract

The proliferative interaction of cultured rat lymphocytes of immunogenetically disparate origin—the mixed lymphocyte interaction—was employed as an experimental model to examine the initial stages of the immune response mechanism. Using mixed cultures of cells derived from parental strain and F1 hybrid rats, in which only the parental lymphocytes respond, the following observations were made on the magnitude and kinetics of the reaction. After initiation of the cultures, there was a latent period of approximately 40 hours during which time no mitotic activity was detected. This inactive phase was followed by a period of proliferation in which previously nondividing cells entered the mitotic cycle for the first time. Activity in the cultures, as detected by incorporation of radioactive thymidine and measured by radioautography or scintillation spectrometry, increased exponentially with a doubling time (T2) of 9–10 hr. In this exponential proliferative phase, lasting approximately 100 hr, the dividing cells underwent a series of rapid sequential divisions with a generation time (Tc) of 8 hr, and few, if any, dropped out of the mitotic cycle. In addition to the cells which first entered mitosis at the beginning of the proliferative phase and then proceeded through multiple divisions, significant numbers of new, previously nondividing cells continued to enter the mitotic cycle during the entire exponential growth phase. The total number of these newly responsive, first division cells throughout the total culture period amounted to 1–3% of the original parental cell inoculum. This is a surprisingly large proportion of peripheral blood lymphocytes with demonstrable reactivity to a particular antigen system, if it is assumed that these first division cells in vitro are functionally related to the hypothetical antigen-sensitive cells which proliferate and differentiate into immunological effector cells. At present there is no entirely satisfactory explanation for this large number of reactive cells in the mixed lymphocyte interaction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albright J. F., Makinodan T. Growth and senescence of antibody-forming cells. J Cell Physiol. 1966 Jun;67(3 Suppl):185+–185+. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040670415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAIN B., VAS M. R., LOWENSTEIN L. THE DEVELOPMENT OF LARGE IMMATURE MONONUCLEAR CELLS IN MIXED LEUKOCYTE CULTURES. Blood. 1964 Jan;23:108–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dutton R. W., Mishell R. I. Cell populations and cell proliferation in the in vitro response of normal mouse spleen to heterologous erythrocytes. Analysis by the hot pulse technique. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):443–454. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dutton R. W. Symposium on in vitro studies of the immune response. II. Significance of the reaction of lymphoid cells to homologous tissue. Bacteriol Rev. 1966 Jun;30(2):397–407. doi: 10.1128/br.30.2.397-407.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KENNEDY J. C., TILL J. E., SIMINOVITCH L., MCCULLOCH E. A. RADIOSENSITIVITY OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO SHEEP RED CELLS IN THE MOUSE, AS MEASURED BY THE HEMOLYTIC PLAQUE METHOD. J Immunol. 1965 May;94:715–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kennedy J. C., Till J. E., Siminovitch L., McCulloch E. A. The proliferative capacity of antigen-sensitive precursors of hemolytic plaque-forming cells. J Immunol. 1966 Jun;96(6):973–980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lennox E. S., Cohn M. Immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1967;36:365–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.36.070167.002053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MOORHEAD P. S., NOWELL P. C., MELLMAN W. J., BATTIPS D. M., HUNGERFORD D. A. Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Sep;20:613–616. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90138-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Makinodan T., Albright J. F. Proliferative and differentiative manifestations of cellular immune potential. Prog Allergy. 1967;10:1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McFarland W., Heilman D. H., Moorhead J. F. Functional anatomy of the lymphocyte in immunological reactions in vitro. J Exp Med. 1966 Nov 1;124(5):851–858. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.5.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mills J. A. The immunologic significance of antigen induced lymphocyte transformation in vitro. J Immunol. 1966 Aug;97(2):239–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PALM J. SEROLOGICAL DETECTION OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS IN TWO STRAINS OF RATS. Transplantation. 1964 Sep;2:603–612. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196409000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ramseier H., Palm J. Further studies of histocompatibility loci in rats. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4):721–729. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SADO T., MAKINODAN T. THE CELL CYCLE OF BLAST CELLS INVOLVED IN SECONDARY ANTIBODY RESPONSE. J Immunol. 1964 Oct;93:696–700. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Silvers W. K., Wilson D. B., Palm J. Mixed leukocyte reactions and histocompatibility in rats. Science. 1967 Feb 10;155(3763):703–704. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3763.703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Simons M. J., Fowler R. Chorioallantoic membrane lesions produced by inoculation of adult fowl small lymphocytes. Nature. 1966 Feb 5;209(5023):588–589. doi: 10.1038/209588a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stewart C. C., Ingram M. A method for counting phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes. Blood. 1967 Apr;29(4 Suppl):628–639. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wilson D. B., Billingham R. E. Lymphocytes and transplantation immunity. Adv Immunol. 1967;7:189–273. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60129-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson D. B. QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON THE BEHAVIOR OF SENSITIZED LYMPHOCYTES IN VITRO : I. RELATIONSHIP OF THE DEGREE OF DESTRUCTION OF HOMOLOGOUS TARGET CELLS TO THE NUMBER OF LYMPHOCYTES AND TO THE TIME OF CONTACT IN CULTURE AND CONSIDERATION OF THE EFFECTS OF ISOIMMUNE SERUM. J Exp Med. 1965 Jul 1;122(1):143–166. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilson D. B. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. I. Conditions and parameters of response. J Exp Med. 1967 Oct 1;126(4):625–654. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.4.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson D. B., Silvers W. K., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. II. Relationship of the proliferative response to the immunologic status of the donors. J Exp Med. 1967 Oct 1;126(4):655–665. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zaalberg O. B., van der Meul V. A., van Twisk J. M. Antibody production by single spleen cells: a comparative study of the cluster and agar-plaque formation. Nature. 1966 Apr 30;210(5035):544–545. doi: 10.1038/210544a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES