Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):81–102. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.81

STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS

XI. THE FATE OF LABELED PICRYL CHLORIDE AND DINITROCHLOROBENZENE AFTER SENSITIZING INJECTIONS

Egon Macher 1, Merrill W Chase 1
PMCID: PMC2138589  PMID: 5782772

Abstract

The fate of 14C-labeled allergens injected intradermally into guinea pigs, namely picryl chloride (PCl*) and 2:4 dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB*), was followed during the induction period of delayed hypersensitivity. Both chemicals were applied in a single injection into one ear in amounts that approached their minimal sensitizing doses (PCl, 0.25 µg; DNCB, 5.0 µg). Radioactivity in the various tissues was determined by liquid scintillation counting after combustion of tissues to CO2 and H2O. The injected allergens seemed to leave the injection site in three phases. A large proportion of allergen escaped rapidly from the ear, about 50% within 3 hr in the case of PCl, within 15 min for DNCB, the difference probably reflecting their unequal reaction constants. Initially there was a "half-life" escape in 2.5 hr with injected dosage of 0.25 µg PCl and in 18 hr for 5.0 µg DNCB. This escape occurred via the regional veins and not via the lymphatics. Radioactive decomposition products of the allergens were already present in the urine within 3–4 hr. After 6–8 hr, the half-life time of escape lengthened to approximately 28 hr for both allergens used in their respective initial dosages, holding up to 2 days after which there occurred still further slowing; between 2 and 4 days the time was about 43 hr for PCl, much longer (72–88 hr?) for DNCB, apparently reflecting different physicochemical properties of this second fraction. Sensitization seemed to be connected with the portion that was present between 12 hr and 4 days of the induction period. It is not known how far the escape of radioactivity during this period may represent gradual hydrolysis of attached picryl and dinitrophenyl groupings, respectively, to form picric acid and dinitrophenol. Gradual accumulation of the second fraction in the regional lymph nodes could definitely be excluded. It was noted that no hypersensitivity arose and essentially no depot of radioactivity existed between 12 hr and 4 days when DNCB was injected in a dose of 0.25 µg, owing to its ready escape from the ear; but 20 times as much DNCB caused sensitization and provided about the same fixed depot as 0.25 µg of picryl chloride. After delayed hypersensitivity had been established, traces of radioactivity were still measurable at the site. This third fraction, probably representing a different coupling product, escaped at a very low rate and was traceable up through several weeks. No demonstrable radioactivity could be detected in thymus, spleen, and mesenteric nodes when examined at short intervals between ½ min and 17 days. In analogy with findings on transplantation "immunity" and with studies reported in the following paper, the induction of delayed hypersensitivity can be explained by encounters between lymphoid cells and the hapten complex which is found present in the local site for 4 days, in agreement with Medawar's concept of peripheral sensitization.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOAK J. L., WOODRUFF M. F. A MODIFIED TECHNIQUE FOR COLLECTING MOUSE THORACIC DUCT LYMPH. Nature. 1965 Jan 23;205:396–397. doi: 10.1038/205396a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brent L., Medawar P. B. Cellular immunity and the homograft reaction. Br Med Bull. 1967 Jan;23(1):55–60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buyukozer I., Mutlu K. S., Pepe F. A. Antigen (ferritin) and antibody distribution in the rat lymph node after primary and secondary responses and after prolonged stimulation. Am J Anat. 1965 Nov;117(3):385–415. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001170306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chase M. W. Hypersensitivity to simple chemicals. Harvey Lect. 1967;61:169–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. EISEN H. N., TABACHNICK M. Elicitation of allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig; the distribution of bound dinitrobenzene groups within the skin and quantitative determination of the extent of combination of 2,4-dinitro-chlorobenzene with epidermal protein in vivo. J Exp Med. 1958 Dec 1;108(6):773–796. doi: 10.1084/jem.108.6.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehrich W. E., Harris T. N. THE FORMATION OF ANTIBODIES IN THE POPLITEAL LYMPH NODE IN RABBITS. J Exp Med. 1942 Oct 1;76(4):335–348. doi: 10.1084/jem.76.4.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ehrich W. STUDIES OF THE LYMPHATIC TISSUE : III. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE RELATION OF THE LYMPHATIC TISSUE TO THE NUMBER OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE BLOOD IN SUBCUTANEOUS INFECTION WITH STAPHYLOCOCCI. J Exp Med. 1929 Feb 28;49(3):347–360. doi: 10.1084/jem.49.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris T. N., Hummeler K., Harris S. Electron microscopic observations on antibody-producing lymph node cells. J Exp Med. 1966 Jan 1;123(1):161–172. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Humphrey J. H., Frank M. M. The localization of non-microbial antigens in the draining lymph nodes of tolerant, normal and primed rabbits. Immunology. 1967 Jul;13(1):87–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MACHER E. [Reaction of the regional lymph nodes in animal experimental allergic contact eczema. I. Macroscopic studies]. Hautarzt. 1962 Jan;13:18–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MEDAWAR P. B. The homograft reaction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Dec 4;149(935):145–166. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Macher E., Chase M. W. Studies on the sensitization of animals with simple chemical compounds. XII. The influence of excision of allergenic depots on onset of delayed hypersensitivity and tolerance. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):103–121. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McMaster P. D., Hudack S. S. THE FORMATION OF AGGLUTININS WITHIN LYMPH NODES. J Exp Med. 1935 May 31;61(6):783–805. doi: 10.1084/jem.61.6.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. NOSSAL G. J., ADA G. L., AUSTIN C. M. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. IV. CELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF 125-I- AND 131-I-LABELLED FLAGELLA IN LYMPH NODES. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:311–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. OORT J., TURK J. L. A HISTOLOGICAL AND AUTORADIOGRAPHIC STUDY OF LYMPH NODES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTACT SENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA-PIG. Br J Exp Pathol. 1965 Apr;46:147–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. OORT J., van RIJSSEL T. Fluorescent protein tracer studies in allergic reactions. I. The fate of fluorescent antigen in active and passive Arthus reaction in the guinea-pig skin. Immunology. 1961 Oct;4:329–336. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. REINHARDT W. O., YOFFEY J. M. Lymphocyte content of lymph from the thoractic and cervical ducts in the guinea-pig. J Physiol. 1957 Apr 30;136(2):227–234. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. RINGERTZ N., ADAMSON C. A. The lymph-node response to various antigens; an experimental-morphological study. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Suppl. 1950;86:1–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. STROBER S., GOWANS J. L. THE ROLE OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE SENSITIZATION OF RATS TO RENAL HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:347–360. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Turk J. L. Lymphocyte response to antigens. A. Afferent side of sensitization arc. Response of lymphocytes to antigens. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4 Suppl):952–961. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707001-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WITTEN V. H., MARCH C. H. Studies of the mechanism of allergic eczematous contact dermatitis. II. Use of C14 labelled 2:4-dinitrochlorobenzene in guinea pigs. J Invest Dermatol. 1958 Aug;31(2):97–102. doi: 10.1038/jid.1958.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES