Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 May 1;129(5):935–951. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.5.935

CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM OF MICE

III. SEPARATE ANTIGEN-SENSITIVE UNITS FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANTI-SHEEP IMMUNOCYTES FORMED BY MARROW-THYMUS CELL MIXTURES

G M Shearer 1, G Cudkowicz 1
PMCID: PMC2138636  PMID: 4888308

Abstract

Marrow cell suspensions of unprimed donor mice have been transplanted into X-irradiated syngeneic hosts. 5–46 days later, bone cavities and spleens contained regenerated cells of the immune system which required interaction with thymocytes (from intact donors) and antigen (SRBC) to form antigen-sensitive units (ASU) and to generate mature immunocytes. These cells were capable of differentiating either into direct or indirect hemolytic plaque-forming cells (PFC). The precursors of PFC regenerated earlier than the other cell type necessary for immunocompetence, the antigen-reactive cell (ARC). The latter was not found until 10 or more days after transplantation. Availability of ARC was inferred from PFC responses elicited by grafted mice challenged with SRBC at varying intervals. In a second series of experiments, graded numbers of marrow cells (ranging from 107 to 5 x 107) were transplanted with 5 x 107 or 108 thymocytes into irradiated mice, and SRBC were given 18 hr later. After 9–12 days the recipient spleens contained all or some of the following immunocytes: direct and indirect PFC, and hemagglutinating cluster-forming cells. The frequency of each immune response varied independently of the others, but in relation to the number of marrow cells grafted. This was interpreted to indicate that ASU formed in irradiated mice by interaction of marrow and thymus cells were similar to those of intact mice. In particular, they were specialized for the molecular class (IgM or IgG) and function (lysis or agglutination) of the antibody to be secreted by their descendent immunocytes. Hence, class-differentiation appeared to be conferred upon ASU by their marrow-derived components.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (947.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aisenberg A. C., Davis C. The thymus and recovery of the sheep erythrocyte response in irradiated mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Dec 1;128(6):1327–1338. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.6.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M., Cudkowicz G., Foster R. S., Jr, Metcalf D. Hemopoietic progenitor cells of W anemic mice studies in vivo and in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 1968 Jun;71(3):211–226. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040710304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaperon E. A., Selner J. C., Claman H. N. Migration of antibody-forming cells and antigen-sensitive precursors between spleen, thymus and bone marrow. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):553–561. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davies A. J., Leuchars E., Wallis V., Koller P. C. The mitotic response of thymus-derived cells to antigenic stimulus. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):438–451. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gershon R. K., Wallis V., Davies A. J., Leuchars E. Inactivation of thymus cells after multiple injections of antigen. Nature. 1968 Apr 27;218(5139):380–381. doi: 10.1038/218380a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Golub E. S., Weigle W. O. Studies on the induction of immunologic unresponsiveness. II. Kinetics. J Immunol. 1967 Sep;99(3):624–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kennedy J. C., Till J. E., Siminovitch L., McCulloch E. A. The proliferative capacity of antigen-sensitive precursors of hemolytic plaque-forming cells. J Immunol. 1966 Jun;96(6):973–980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. I. Hemolysin-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):801–820. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):821–837. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Immunological activity of thymus and thoracic-duct lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jan;59(1):296–303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.1.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mosier D. E., Coppleson L. W. A THREE-CELL INTERACTION REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nossal G. J., Cunningham A., Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 3. Chromosomal marker analysis of single antibody-forming cells in reconstituted, irradiated, or thymectomized mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):839–853. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osoba D. Thymic control of cellular differentiation in the immunological system. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Feb;127(2):418–420. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Playfair J. H., Papermaster B. W., Cole L. J. Focal antibody production by transferred spleen cells in irradiated mice. Science. 1965 Aug 27;149(3687):998–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3687.998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raidt D. J., Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Cellular events in the immune response : analysis and in vitro response of mouse spleen cell populations separated by differential flotation in albumin gradients. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):681–698. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G. Cluster formation in vitro by mouse spleen cells and sheep erythrocytes. J Immunol. 1968 Dec;101(6):1264–1270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G., Connell M. S., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. I. Separate splenic antigen-sensitive units for different types of anti-sheep antibody-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1968 Sep 1;128(3):437–457. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.3.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor R. B. Immune paralysis of thymus cells by bovine serum albumin. Nature. 1968 Nov 9;220(5167):611–611. doi: 10.1038/220611a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trentin J., Wolf N., Cheng V., Fahlberg W., Weiss D., Bonhag R. Antibody production by mice repopulated with limited numbers of clones of lymphoid cell precursors. J Immunol. 1967 Jun;98(6):1326–1337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tyan M. L., Herzenberg L. A. Studies on the ontogeny of the mouse immune system. II. Immunoglobulin-producing cells. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):446–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES