Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 May 1;129(5):1079–1107. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.5.1079

THE HOST RESPONSE TO CALMETTE-GUÉRIN BACILLUS INFECTION IN MICE

R V Blanden 1, M J Lefford 1, G B Mackaness 1
PMCID: PMC2138639  PMID: 4976109

Abstract

Heterologous organisms (L. monocytogenes and S. typhimurium) were used to study the rate of development, magnitude, and persistence of the antimicrobial resistance engendered in mice by vaccination with BCG. These same methods were used to investigate the influence of prior vaccination on the host response to reinfection. The rate of onset and magnitude of the resistance produced by BCG varied with the vaccinating dose. Increased resistance was detected within 48 hr of injecting large numbers of BCG (approximately 108 viable units), but concurrent treatment with isoniazid interrupted its further development. An equal number of heat-killed organisms failed to influence host resistance significantly. The development of tuberculin sensitivity was also dependent upon the continued survival of the immunizing population of BCG. When vaccinated mice were reinfected with BCG, host resistance in spleen and liver was rapidly augmented to the accompaniment of striking changes in the morphology and microbicidal activity of the peritoneal macrophages. These changes occurred most rapidly in mice with a high level of delayed hypersensitivity at the time of reinfection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker P. J., Landy M. Brevity of the inductive phase in the immune response of mice to capsular polysaccharide antigens. J Immunol. 1967 Oct;99(4):687–694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blanden R. V., Mackaness G. B., Collins F. M. Mechanisms of acquired resistance in mouse typhoid. J Exp Med. 1966 Oct 1;124(4):585–600. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.4.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COHN Z. A., BENSON B. THE IN VITRO DIFFERENTIATION OF MONONUCLEAR PHAGOCYTES. II. THE INFLUENCE OF SERUM ON GRANULE FORMATION, HYDROLASE PRODUCTION, AND PINOCYTOSIS. J Exp Med. 1965 May 1;121:835–848. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.5.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COHN Z. A. Determinants of infection in the peritoneal cavity. I. Response to and fate of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus albus in the mouse. Yale J Biol Med. 1962 Aug;35:12–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DUBOS R. J., PIERCE C. H., SCHAEFER W. B. Antituberculous immunity induced in mice by vaccination with living cultures of attenuated tubercle bacilli. J Exp Med. 1953 Feb 1;97(2):207–220. doi: 10.1084/jem.97.2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dannenberg A. M., Jr Cellular hypersensitivity and cellular immunity in the pathogensis of tuberculosis: specificity, systemic and local nature, and associated macrophage enzymes. Bacteriol Rev. 1968 Jun;32(2):85–102. doi: 10.1128/br.32.2.85-102.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dannenberg A. M., Jr, Meyer O. T., Esterly J. R., Kambara T. The local nature of immunity in tuberculosis, illustrated histochemically in dermal BCG lesions. J Immunol. 1968 May;100(5):931–941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ELBERG S. S., SCHNEIDER P., FONG J. Cross-immunity between Brucella melitensis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis; intracellular behavior of Brucella melitensis in monocytes from vaccinated animals. J Exp Med. 1957 Oct 1;106(4):545–554. doi: 10.1084/jem.106.4.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fauve R. M., Bouanchaud D., Delaunay A. Résistance cellulaire à l'infection bactérienne. IV. Immunisation active et résistance des macrophages de souris NCS à la multiplication intracellulaire de Listeria monocytogenes, Corynebacterium kutscheri et Brucella melitensis. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1966 Mar;110(3 Suppl):106–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. GROGG E., PEARSE A. G. E. The enzymic and lipid histochemistry of experimental tuberculosis. Br J Exp Pathol. 1952 Dec;33(6):567–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MACKANESS G. B. THE IMMUNOLOGICAL BASIS OF ACQUIRED CELLULAR RESISTANCE. J Exp Med. 1964 Jul 1;120:105–120. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mackaness G. B. The immunology of antituberculous immunity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968 Mar;97(3):337–344. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1968.97.3.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mackaness G. B. The relationship of delayed hypersensitivity to acquired cellular resistance. Br Med Bull. 1967 Jan;23(1):52–54. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SUTER E., RAMSEIAR H. CELLULAR REACTIONS IN INFECTION. Adv Immunol. 1964;27:117–173. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60707-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. UHR J. W., FINKELSTEIN M. S., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. III. The primary and secondary antibody response to bacteriophage phi X 174 in guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1962 Mar 1;115:655–670. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES