Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):467–480. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.467

CELLULAR DIFFERENTIATION OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM OF MICE

IV. LACK OF CLASS DIFFERENTIATION IN THYMIC ANTIGEN-REACTIVE CELLS

G M Shearer 1, G Cudkowicz 1, R L Priore 1
PMCID: PMC2138712  PMID: 4185245

Abstract

Thymocytes and marrow cells of unprimed donor mice were mixed in vitro and transplanted into X-irradiated syngeneic mice. 18 hr later, sheep erythrocytes were injected to induce immune responses. Splenic plaque-forming cells (PFC) secreting IgM (direct PFC) or IgG (indirect PFC) hemolytic antibody were enumerated at the time of peak responses. By transplanting graded and limiting numbers of thymocytes with 4 x 107 marrow cells, inocula were found which contained one or a few thymic antigen-reactive cells (ARC) reaching the recipient spleens, interacting with marrow cells, and inducing PFC formation. The frequency values of ARC inferred from direct and indirect plaque assays were very similar, 1 in ∼107 thymocytes. Furthermore, statistical analysis indicated that the formation of direct PFC was not independent of the formation of indirect PFC. This was interpreted to mean that ARC were not specialized themselves and did not determine the molecular class of antibody to be secreted after interaction with marrow cells. Spleens of thymus-marrow grafted mice containing one or two ARC and non-limiting numbers of marrow precursors of PFC (P-PFC), had direct and indirect PFC clustered in several focal areas. Assuming that each focal area represented the progeny of one P-PFC that had interacted with ARC, these results confirmed the statistical evidence for lack of class differentiation in thymic ARC, and also indicated that each ARC or its progeny cells interacted with more than one P-PFC of either class.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (796.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong W. D., Diener E., Shellam G. R. Antigen-reactive cells in normal, immunized, and tolerant mice. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):393–410. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum J., Liebermann G., Frenkel E. P. The effect of immunologically induced lymphopenia on antibody formation. J Immunol. 1969 Jan;102(1):187–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosma M. J., Perkins E. H., Makinodan T. Further characterization of the lymphoid cell transfer system for the study of antigen-sensitive progenitor cells. J Immunol. 1968 Nov;101(5):963–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Celada F., Wigzell H. Immune responses in spleen colonies. II. Clonal assortment of 19S- and 7S-producing cells in mice reacting against two antigens. Immunology. 1966 Nov;11(5):453–466. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Selner J. C. Thymus-marrow immunocompetence. 3. The requirement for living thymus cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Feb;127(2):462–466. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cudkowicz G., Shearer G. M., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. V. Class differentiation in marrow precursors of plaque-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):481–491. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies A. J., Leuchars E., Wallis V., Koller P. C. The mitotic response of thymus-derived cells to antigenic stimulus. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):438–451. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dutton R. W., Mishell R. I. Cell populations and cell proliferation in the in vitro response of normal mouse spleen to heterologous erythrocytes. Analysis by the hot pulse technique. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):443–454. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gershon R. K., Wallis V., Davies A. J., Leuchars E. Inactivation of thymus cells after multiple injections of antigen. Nature. 1968 Apr 27;218(5139):380–381. doi: 10.1038/218380a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUMPHREY J. H., PARROTT D. M., EAST J. STUDIES ON GLOBULIN AND ANTIBODY PRODUCTION IN MICE THYMECTOMIZED AT BIRTH. Immunology. 1964 Jul;7:419–439. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kennedy J. C., Till J. E., Siminovitch L., McCulloch E. A. The proliferative capacity of antigen-sensitive precursors of hemolytic plaque-forming cells. J Immunol. 1966 Jun;96(6):973–980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Leuchars E., Wallis V. J., Davies A. J. Mode of action for anti-lymphocyte serum. Nature. 1968 Sep 28;219(5161):1325–1328. doi: 10.1038/2191325a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin W. J., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. IV. Site of action of antilymphocyte globulin. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):855–874. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. The thymus and the precursors of antigen reactive cells. Nature. 1967 Nov 18;216(5116):659–663. doi: 10.1038/216659a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):821–837. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nossal G. J., Cunningham A., Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 3. Chromosomal marker analysis of single antibody-forming cells in reconstituted, irradiated, or thymectomized mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):839–853. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Osoba D. Restriction of the capacity to respond to two antigens by single precursors of antibody-producing cells in culture. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):141–152. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G., Connell M. S., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. I. Separate splenic antigen-sensitive units for different types of anti-sheep antibody-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1968 Sep 1;128(3):437–457. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.3.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. II. Frequency of unipotent splenic antigen-sensitive units after immunization with sheep erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):185–199. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor R. B. Immune paralysis of thymus cells by bovine serum albumin. Nature. 1968 Nov 9;220(5167):611–611. doi: 10.1038/220611a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tyan M. L., Herzenberg L. A. Studies on the ontogeny of the mouse immune system. II. Immunoglobulin-producing cells. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):446–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES