Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):595–617. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.595

IDIOTYPY OF RABBIT ANTIBODIES

I. COMPARISON OF IDIOTYPY OF ANTIBODIES AGAINST SALMONELLA TYPHI WITH THAT OF ANTIBODIES AGAINST OTHER BACTERIA IN THE SAME RABBITS, OR OF ANTIBODIES AGAINST SALMONELLA TYPHI IN VARIOUS RABBITS

Jacques Oudin 1, Mauricette Michel 1
PMCID: PMC2138715  PMID: 4390062

Abstract

Sera of rabbits immunized against Salmonella typhi have been studied for the idiotypy of certain of their components, i.e., the property of these components to possess an antigenic specificity which is different in individual rabbits, and which varies with the antigens against which these rabbits have been immunized. The reagent used (precipitating anti-idiotypic sera) have been prepared by injecting rabbits with bacteria agglutinated by anti-S. typhi sera (immunizing sera) as was done in the first observations by the authors of the phenomenon in the rabbit. These first observations have been confirmed and extended. In contrast to allotypy, the anti-idiotypic sera precipitate the corresponding immunizing sera, but not the sera taken in the immunizing rabbits prior to their immunization against S. typhi, nor the immunizing sera absorbed with the somatic antigen of S. typhi, demonstrating that idiotypes are antibodies. The idiotypic specificities of the antibodies of one rabbit against S. typhi are not detected in the antibodies of the same rabbit against another noncross-reacting Salmonella (S. tranoroa) and vice versa; nor are they detected in the anti-pneumococcal antibodies of the same rabbit. Each anti-idiotypic serum fails to precipitate anti-S. typhi sera of rabbits other than the immunizing one except for certain extremely faint reactions, the significance of which has not been established. The idiotypic specificities of anti-S. typhi antibodies of three rabbits were not found in anti-S. typhi antibodies of their parents. This lack of a sign of hereditary transmission of idiotypic specificities contrasts with allotypy. The apparent role of random chance in the determinism of the idiotypic patterns or of the idiotypic determinants has been discussed. Unless it were admitted that antibodies with similar functions do not exist in different individuals, idiotypy apparently adds an order of magnitude to the antibody variability which had been previously envisaged. In one given individual, the heterogeneity of the idiotypic specificities seems to be less extended than that of the antibody functions. The possible relationships between these two levels of molecular variability and between the corresponding levels of cellular variability have been discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dubiski S., Muller P. J. A "new" allotypic specificity (A9) of rabbit immunoglobulin. Nature. 1967 May 13;214(5089):696–697. doi: 10.1038/214696a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GELL P. G., KELUS A. S. ANTI-ANTIBODY OR CLONE-PRODUCT? Nature. 1964 Feb 15;201:687–689. doi: 10.1038/201687a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GREY H. M., MANNIK M., KUNKEL H. G. INDIVIDUAL ANTIGENIC SPECIFICITY OF MYELOMA PROTEINS. CHARACTERISTICS AND LOCALIZATION TO SUBUNITS. J Exp Med. 1965 Apr 1;121:561–575. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.4.561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gell P. G., Kelus A. S. Anti-antibodies. Adv Immunol. 1967;6:461–478. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60526-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelus A. S., Gell P. G. Immunological analysis of rabbit anti-antibody systems. J Exp Med. 1968 Jan 1;127(1):215–234. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.1.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kunkel H. G., Mannik M., Williams R. C. Individual Antigenic Specificity of Isolated Antibodies. Science. 1963 Jun 14;140(3572):1218–1219. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3572.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LE MINOR L., LE NOC P., DREAN D. [A new somatic antigen of Salmonella]. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1961 Jul;101:133–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lennox E. S., Cohn M. Immunoglobulins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1967;36:365–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.36.070167.002053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MILGROM F., DUBINSKI S. Antigenicity of antibodies of the same species. Nature. 1957 Jun 29;179(4574):1351–1352. doi: 10.1038/1791351b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. OUDIN J. Allotypy of rabbit serum proteins. I. Immuno-chemical analysis leading to the individualization of seven main allotypes. J Exp Med. 1960 Jul 1;112:107–124. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. OUDIN J. Allotypy of rabbit serum proteins. II. Relationships between various allotypes: their common antigenic specificity, their distribution in a sample population; genetic implications. J Exp Med. 1960 Jul 1;112:125–142. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.1.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. OUDIN J. B. Specific precipitation in gels and its application to immunochemical analysis. Methods Med Res. 1952;5:335–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. OUDIN J. L'allotypie de certains antigènes protéidiques du sérum. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1956 May 23;242(21):2606–2608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oudin J. L'hétérogénéité des immunoglobulines telle qu'elle est révélée par leurs trois sortes de spécificités antigéniques: isotypiques, allotypiques et idiotypiques. Bull Soc Chim Biol (Paris) 1968 Sep 28;50(5):965–990. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oudin J., Michel M. Idiotypy of rabbit antibodies. II. Comparison of idiotypy of various kinds of antibodies formed in the same rabbits against Salmonella typhi. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):619–642. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oudin J., Michel M. Sur les spécificités idiotypiques des anticorps de lapin anti-S. typhi. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1969 Jan 6;268(1):230–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oudin J. The genetic control of immunoglobulin synthesis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Nov 22;166(1003):207–221. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. POTTER M., BOYCE C. R. Induction of plasma-cell neoplasms in strain BALB/c mice with mineral oil and mineral oil adjuvants. Nature. 1962 Mar 17;193:1086–1087. doi: 10.1038/1931086a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Prahl J. W., Porter R. R. Allotype-related sequence variation of the heavy chain of rabbit immunoglobulin G. Biochem J. 1968 May;107(6):753–763. doi: 10.1042/bj1070753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SLATER R. J., WARD S. M., KUNKEL H. G. Immunological relationships among the myeloma proteins. J Exp Med. 1955 Jan 1;101(1):85–108. doi: 10.1084/jem.101.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Willims R. C., Jr, Kunkel H. G., Capra J. D. Antigenic specificities related to the cold agglutinin activity of gamma M globulins. Science. 1968 Jul 26;161(3839):379–381. doi: 10.1126/science.161.3839.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES