Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):368–383. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.368

SOME PHYSICAL AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF IMMUNOLOGICALLY REACTIVE MOUSE SPLEEN CELLS

David Osoba 1
PMCID: PMC2138742  PMID: 4927599

Abstract

Three classes of immunologically reactive cells, differing only slightly in size from each other, are required for the production of hemolysin-forming cells in culture. The three classes of cells can be detected in the normal mouse spleen by the combined use of rosette formation, velocity sedimentation, and irradiation. One class of cells (peak sedimentation velocity, 3.2 mm per hr) forms rosettes. The capacity of these cells to participate in immune responses to foreign erythrocytes is inhibited by relatively low doses of irradiation. These cells may be the immediate precursors of hemolysin-forming cells. A second class of cells (peak sedimentation velocity, 3.6 mm per hr) facilitates the production of hemolysin-forming cells by small numbers of normal spleen cells. Their facilitative activity is resistant to a relatively large dose of radiation. They do not form rosettes. The requirement of a third class of cells was deduced from the results of mixing experiments. Neither rosette-forming cells nor spleen cells largely depleted of rosette-forming cells could give rise to hemolysin-forming cells when cultured either alone or in the presence of large numbers of heavily irradiated cells. However, when rosette-forming cells, cells depleted of rosette-forming cells, and heavily irradiated cells were mixed together, hemolysin-forming cells were produced. The peak responses were found in fractions sedimenting at 4 mm per hr. Thus, it is suggested that these fractions contain a third class of cells. This class of cells does not form rosettes, but its function is inhibited by relatively low doses of radiation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (817.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966 Aug-Sep;122(4):1167–1171. doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldie J. H., Osoba D. Requirement of a nonproliferating class of cells for generation of immune responses in cell culture. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1970 Apr;133(4):1265–1269. doi: 10.3181/00379727-133-34667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haskill J. S., Byrt P., Marbrook J. In vitro and in vivo studies of the immune response to sheep erythrocytes using partially purified cell preparations. J Exp Med. 1970 Jan 1;131(1):57–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Laskov R. Rosette forming cells in non-immunized mice. Nature. 1968 Aug 31;219(5157):973–975. doi: 10.1038/219973a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Marbrook J. Primary immune response in cultures of spleen cells. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Jun;73(3):191–201. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040730305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mosier D. E., Coppleson L. W. A THREE-CELL INTERACTION REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mosier D. E., Fitch F. W., Rowley D. A., Davies A. J. Cellular deficit in thymectomized mice. Nature. 1970 Jan 17;225(5229):276–277. doi: 10.1038/225276a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nossal G. J., Cunningham A., Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 3. Chromosomal marker analysis of single antibody-forming cells in reconstituted, irradiated, or thymectomized mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):839–853. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Osoba D. Restriction of the capacity to respond to two antigens by single precursors of antibody-producing cells in culture. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):141–152. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roseman J. X-ray resistant cell required for the induction of in vitro antibody formation. Science. 1969 Sep 12;165(3898):1125–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3898.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rotman B., Papermaster B. W. Membrane properties of living mammalian cells as studied by enzymatic hydrolysis of fluorogenic esters. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jan;55(1):134–141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.55.1.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES