Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):163–180. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.163

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE IN SYRIAN HAMSTERS

I. THE EPIDERMOLYTIC SYNDROME: DESCRIPTION AND STUDIES ON ITS PROCUREMENT

J Wayne Streilein 1, R E Billingham 1
PMCID: PMC2138745  PMID: 4396296

Abstract

F1 hybrid hamsters derived from genetically disparate strains develop a severe and often lethal cutaneous disorder when inoculated intracutaneously with immunologically competent lymphoid cells from either parental strain, The disease is characterized clinically by extensive epidermal necrolysis, and histologically by a complete dissolution of the dermal-epidermal junction. The requisites for elicitation of this syndrome were determined to be: (a) the parental strains must differ from each other at a major histocompatibility locus, and (b) the donor inoculum must contain immunologically competent parental strain cells. In addition it was found that specifically sensitized cells surpassed normal unsensitized ones in their ability to elicit the disease, and that the disease can be transferred adoptively from affected to normal F1 hosts by means of lymphoid cells. On the basis of these observations, it was concluded that the disease was immunologic in nature, and graft-versus-host in type. However, a series of critical studies failed to demonstrate that the epidermolysis had an immunogenetically specific basis, thus invalidating the provisional assumption that this lesion resulted from a direct immunologic attack upon parenchymal cells of the epidermis and dermis. With the aid of radiation chimeras, it was clearly established that typical epidermolysis could be induced in skin of the same genetic constitution as the attacking donor lymphoid cells. This paradox was taken into account by the possibility that, amid the intense local cutaneous graft-versus-host reactions, "skin-specific" antigenic determinants are bared which incite a quasi autoimmune response that in turn is responsible for the epidermolytic lesions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (975.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BILLINGHAM R. E., DEFENDIV, SILVERS W. K., STEINMULLER D. Quantitative studies on the induction of tolerance of skin homografts and on runt disease in neonatal rats. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1962 Feb;28:365–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., SILVERS W. K. STUDIES ON HOMOGRAFTS OF FOETAL AND INFANT SKIN AND FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE ANOMALOUS PROPERTIES OF POUCH SKIN GRAFTS IN HAMSTERS. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Dec 15;161:168–190. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Billingham R. E. The biology of graft-versus-host reactions. Harvey Lect. 1966;62:21–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COCK A. G., SIMONSEN M. Immunological attack on newborn chickens by injected adult cells. Immunology. 1958 Apr;1(2):103–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LYELL A. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: an eruption resembling scalding of the skin. Br J Dermatol. 1956 Nov;68(11):355–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1956.tb12766.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Thymus and antigen-reactive cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:3–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ramseier H., Billingham R. E. Studies on delayed cutaneous inflammatory reactions elicited by inoculation of homologous cells into hamsters' skins. J Exp Med. 1966 Apr 1;123(4):629–656. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.4.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SIMONSEN M. The impact on the developing embryo and newborn animal of adult homologous cells. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1957;40(6):480–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SINKOVICS J. G., HOWE C. D. APPROACHES TO THE PATHOGENESIS OF RUNT (HOMOLOGOUS) DISEASE. Tex Rep Biol Med. 1964;22:591–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. STASTNY P., STEMBRIDGE V. A., ZIFF M. HOMOLOGOUS DISEASE IN THE ADULT RAT, A MODEL FOR AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE. I. GENERAL FEATURES AND CUTANEOUS LESIONS. J Exp Med. 1963 Oct 1;118:635–648. doi: 10.1084/jem.118.4.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Streilein J. W., Billingham R. E. An evaluation of the irradiated hamster test as a means of predicting histocompatibility in various species. Transplantation. 1968 Aug;6(5):694–705. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196808000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van BEKKUM D. Determination of specific immunological tolerance in radiation chimeras. Transplantation. 1963 Jan;1:39–57. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196301010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES