Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Jan 1;131(1):149–164. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.1.149

IN VITRO INDUCTION OF SPECIFIC UNRESPONSIVENESS OF IMMUNOLOGICALLY REACTIVE, NORMAL BONE MARROW CELLS

Sharwan K Singhal 1, Hans Wigzell 1
PMCID: PMC2138763  PMID: 5460612

Abstract

Normal rabbit bone marrow cells have been studied according to their immunological reactivity in vitro. The test system involved stimulation by antigen after the subsequent stimulation into cellular proliferation by measuring the uptake of tritium-labeled thymidine. Specific separation of immunological reactivity was obtained by filtration of cells through antigen-coated bead columns. All experimental evidence supported the view that this separation was due to the existence of preformed antibody molecules on the outer cell surface of the antigen-recognizing cells. The response to antigenic stimulation was shown to be strictly dose related and, using supraoptimal concentrations of one antigen, no increased DNA synthesis was recorded. That this state of unresponsiveness represented a state of immunological paralysis was indicated by the normal response of these cells to stimulation by a second antigen in optimal concentration. Thus both methods, cell separation on antigen-coated columns or induction of specific unresponsiveness by antigen in vitro, can produce a cell population specifically devoid of cells reactive against a given antigen.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (798.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdou N. I., Richter M. Cells involved in the immune response. X. The transfer of antibody-forming capacity to irradiated rabbits by antigen-reactive cells isolated from normal allogeneic rabbit bone marrow after passage through antigen-sensitized glass bead columns. J Exp Med. 1969 Jul 1;130(1):141–163. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. I. Hemolysin-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):801–820. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Playfair J. H. Specific tolerance to sheep erythrocytes in mouse bone marrow cells. Nature. 1969 May 31;222(5196):882–883. doi: 10.1038/222882a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rajewsky K., Schirrmacher V., Nase S., Jerne N. K. The requirement of more than one antigenic determinant for immunogenicity. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1131–1143. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Richter M., Abdou N. I. Cells involved in the immune response. VII. The demonstration, using allotypic markers, of antibody formation by irradiation-resistant cells of irradiated rabbits injected with normal allogeneic bone marrow cells and sheep erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1261–1273. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Singhal K., Richter M. Cells involved in the immune response. I. The response of normal rabbit bone marrow cells to antigens in vitro. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1968;33(5):493–500. doi: 10.1159/000230064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Singhal S. K., Richter M. Cells involved in the immune response. IV. The response of normal and immune rabbit bone marrow and lymphoid tissue lymphocytes to antigens in vitro. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1099–1128. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Singhal S. K., Richter M., Osmond D. G. Cells involved in the immune response. 3. Responsiveness in antigens of a lymphocyte-rich fraction of normal rabbit bone marrow. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1968;34(3):224–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor R. B. Cellular cooperation in the antibody response of mice to two serum albumins: specific function of thymus cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:114–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Taylor R. B. Immune paralysis of thymus cells by bovine serum albumin. Nature. 1968 Nov 9;220(5167):611–611. doi: 10.1038/220611a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wigzell H., Andersson B. Cell separation on antigen-coated columns. Elimination of high rate antibody-forming cells and immunological memory cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):23–36. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wigzell H. Use of humoral or cellbound antibody to achieve depression of immunological reactivity. Antibiot Chemother. 1969;15:82–97. doi: 10.1159/000386773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES