Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Jan 31;131(2):409–427. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.2.409

AN ANALYSIS OF THE GENETIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DELAYED CUTANEOUS HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS TO TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS IN MICE

J Wayne Streilein 1, R E Billingham 1
PMCID: PMC2138791  PMID: 4392949

Abstract

The experiments reported herein provide ample evidence that mice, like most other mammalian species, are capable of displaying readily observable and reproducible delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions indicative of transplantation immunity. By employing a variety of genetically defined strains, it has been shown that a genetic requirement for the development of a positive normal lymphocyte transfer reaction in mice is a difference between host and cell donor at the H-2 locus. By contrast, the immune lymphocyte transfer reaction consistently reflected the full range of histoincompatibility, both inclusive and exclusive of the H-2. It was incidentally discovered that erythema regularly accompanied delayed cutaneous reactions in the skins of female mice, whereas no local redness accompanied their counterparts in male skins. The influence of cutaneous erythema on the scoring of delayed skin reactions is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (927.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Tissue transplantation: a new approach to the "typing" problem. Br Med J. 1963 Aug 3;2(5352):269–272. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5352.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brent L., Medawar P. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. 8. The effects of irradiation. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Oct 11;165(1001):413–423. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brent L., Medawar P. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. VII. The normal lymphocyte transfer reaction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Sep 13;165(1000):281–307. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cinader B., Dubiski S., Wardlaw A. C. Genetics of MuB1 and of a complement defect in inbred strains of mice. Genet Res. 1966 Feb;7(1):32–43. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300009459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowle A. J., Hu C. C. Investigation of the mechanisms by whick "enhancing" antiserum prevents induction of delayed hypersensitivity to protein antigens in mice. J Allergy. 1969 Apr;43(4):209–223. doi: 10.1016/0021-8707(69)90064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowle A. J., Hu C. C. Split tolerance affecting delayed hypersensitivity and induced in mice by pre-immunization with protein antigens in solution. Clin Exp Immunol. 1966 Jul;1(3):323–335. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DVORAK H. F., WAKSMAN B. H. Primary immunization of lymph node cells in millipore chambers by exposure to homograft antigen. J Exp Med. 1962 Jul 1;116:1–16. doi: 10.1084/jem.116.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dekaris D., Allegretti N. Cutaneous reactions in mice injected intradermally with allogeneic cells. Transplantation. 1968 Mar;6(2):296–298. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196803000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GORER P. A., MIKULSKA Z. B. The antibody response to tumor inoculation; improved methods of antibody detection. Cancer Res. 1954 Oct;14(9):651–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoy W. E., Nelson D. S. Delayed-type hypersensitivity in mice after skin and tumour allografts and tumour isografts. Nature. 1969 Jun 7;222(5197):1001–1003. doi: 10.1038/2221001a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MERRILL J. P., FRIEDMAN E. A., WILSON R. E., MARSHALL D. C. The production of "delayed type" cutaneous hypersensitivity to human donor leukocytes as a result of the rejection of skin homografts. J Clin Invest. 1961 Apr;40:631–635. doi: 10.1172/JCI104294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RAMSEIER H., STREILEIN J. W. HOMOGRAFT SENSITIVITY REACTIONS IN IRRADIATED HAMSTERS. Lancet. 1965 Mar 20;1(7386):622–624. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(65)91713-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ramseier H., Billingham R. E. Studies on delayed cutaneous inflammatory reactions elicited by inoculation of homologous cells into hamsters' skins. J Exp Med. 1966 Apr 1;123(4):629–656. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.4.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SCHIERMAN L. W., NORDSKOG A. W. Influence of the B bloodgroup-histocompatibility locus in chickens on a graft-versus-host reaction. Nature. 1963 Feb 2;197:511–512. doi: 10.1038/197511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Streilein J. W., Barker C. F. Transplantation immunity and delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in dogs. J Immunol. 1967 Mar;98(3):601–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Streilein J. W., Billingham R. E. An evaluation of the irradiated hamster test as a means of predicting histocompatibility in various species. Transplantation. 1968 Aug;6(5):694–705. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196808000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Streilein J. W., Billingham R. E. Cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions to cellular isoantigens in rats. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):455–473. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. VREDEVOE D. L. THE PRODUCTION AND TRANSFER OF IMMUNE REACTIONS TO BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN IN ISOGENIC AND ALLOGENEIC MICE. II. DERMAL REACTIVITY. J Immunol. 1964 May;92:717–723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES