Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Jan 31;131(2):247–274. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.2.247

ANTIBODY-MEDIATED SUPPRESSION OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE IN VITRO

I. EVIDENCE FOR A CENTRAL EFFECT

Marc Feldmann 1, Erwin Diener 1
PMCID: PMC2138797  PMID: 5463248

Abstract

Antibody-mediated suppression of the in vitro immune response to polymerized flagellin of Salmonella adelaide and to sheep erythrocytes was studied at the cellular level. Normal mouse spleen cells, preincubated in vitro with mixtures of antigen and antibody for short periods of time before being washed, did not respond to an optimal antigenic challenge in vitro, whereas similar cells treated with antibody alone gave a normal response. The degree of immune suppression was found to depend on the time of preincubation. Significant immune suppression could be induced in as short a time as 15 min, whereas profound suppression (90%) required the incubation of cells with mixtures of antigen and antibody for 4–6 hr. Mouse spleen cells treated similarly were also unable to respond subsequently to the antigen upon transfer to lethally irradiated hosts, as measured at both the level of the antigen-reactive cell and that of serum antibody production. These results were taken as evidence that in vitro an effect of antibody-mediated suppression occurred at the level of the immunocompetent cell. Similarities between immune tolerance and antibody-mediated suppression in vitro were described, and the significance of the findings discussed in the light of current concepts of the mechanism of antibody-mediated suppression.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADA G. L., NOSSAL G. J., PYE J., ABBOT A. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. I. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF FLAGELLAR ANTIGENS FROM SALMONELLA ADELAIDE. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:267–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong W. D., Diener E. A new method for the enumeration of antigen-reactive cells responsive to a purified protein antigen. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):371–391. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelrad M., Rowley D. A. Hypersensitivity: specific immunologic suppression of the delayed type. Science. 1968 Jun 28;160(3835):1465–1467. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3835.1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyns A. R., Hardwicke J. Immunological responsiveness following the continuous circulation of soluble antigen--antibody complexes. Immunology. 1968 Aug;15(2):263–269. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cerottini J. C., McConahey P. J., Dixon F. J. The immunosuppressive effect of passively administered antibody IgG fragments. J Immunol. 1969 Apr;102(4):1008–1015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966 Aug-Sep;122(4):1167–1171. doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cunningham A. J. A method of increased sensitivity for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Nature. 1965 Sep 4;207(5001):1106–1107. doi: 10.1038/2071106a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diener E. A new method for the enumeration of single antibody-producing cells. J Immunol. 1968 May;100(5):1062–1070. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Diener E., Armstrong W. D. Immunological tolerance in vitro: kinetic studies at the cellular level. J Exp Med. 1969 Mar 1;129(3):591–603. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.3.591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Diener E., Armstrong W. D. Induction of antibody formation and tolerance in vitro to a purified protein antigen. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1281–1285. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90394-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dresser D. W., Mitchison N. A. The mechanism of immunological paralysis. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:129–181. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HANKS J. H., WALLACE J. H. Determination of cell viability. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 May;98(1):188–192. doi: 10.3181/00379727-98-23985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henry C., Jerne N. K. Competition of 19S and 7S antigen receptors in the regulation of the primary immune response. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):133–152. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KALISS N. Immunological enhancement of tumor homografts in mice: a review. Cancer Res. 1958 Oct;18(9):992–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kennedy J. C., Siminovitch L., Till J. E., McCulloch E. A. A transplantation assay for mouse cells responsive to antigenic stimulation by sheep erythrocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1965 Dec;120(3):868–873. doi: 10.3181/00379727-120-30678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MOLLER G., WIGZELL H. ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL. ANTIBODY-INDUCED SUPPRESSION OF 19S AND 7S ANTIBODY RESPONSE. J Exp Med. 1965 Jun 1;121:969–989. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.6.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marbrook J. Primary immune response in cultures of spleen cells. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):821–837. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morris A., Möller G. Regulation of cellular antibody synthesis effect of adoptively transferred antibody-producing spleen cells on cellular antibody synthesis. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):439–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mosier D. E. Cell interactions in the primary immune response in vitro: a requirement for specific cell clusters. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):351–362. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicholas R., Sinclair S. C. Regulation of the immune response. I. Reduction in ability of specific antibody to inhibit long-lasting IgG immunological priming after removal of the Fc fragment. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1183–1201. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Playfair J. H., Papermaster B. W., Cole L. J. Focal antibody production by transferred spleen cells in irradiated mice. Science. 1965 Aug 27;149(3687):998–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3687.998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. ROWLEY D. A., FITCH F. W. HOMEOSTASIS OF ANTIBODY FORMATION IN THE ADULT RAT. J Exp Med. 1964 Dec 1;120:987–1005. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.6.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rowley D. A., Fitch F. W., Axelrad M. A., Pierce C. W. The immune response suppressed by specific antibody. Immunology. 1969 Apr;16(4):549–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rowley D. A., Fitch F. W., Mosier D. E., Solliday S., Coppleson L. W., Brown B. W. The rate of division of antibody-forming cells during the early primary immune response. J Exp Med. 1968 May 1;127(5):983–1002. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.5.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. SPIEGELBERG H. L., WEIGLE W. O. THE CATABOLISM OF HOMOLOGOUS AND HETEROLOGOUS 7S GAMMA GLOBULIN FRAGMENTS. J Exp Med. 1965 Mar 1;121:323–338. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.3.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stuart F. P., Saitoh T., Fitch F. W. Rejection of renal allografts: specific immunologic suppression. Science. 1968 Jun 28;160(3835):1463–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3835.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tao T. W., Uhr J. W. Capacity of pepsin-digested antibody to inhibit antibody formation. Nature. 1966 Oct 8;212(5058):208–209. doi: 10.1038/212208a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. I. The suppression of antibody formation by passively administered antibody. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:935–957. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. UHR J. W., BAUMANN J. B. Antibody formation. II. The specific anamnestic antibody response. J Exp Med. 1961 May 1;113:959–970. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.5.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Uhr J. W., Möller G. Regulatory effect of antibody on the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:81–127. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60465-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES