Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Sep 1;132(3):558–582. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.3.558

CUTANEOUS BASOPHIL HYPERSENSITIVITY

II. A LIGHT AND ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC DESCRIPTION

Harold F Dvorak 1, Ann M Dvorak 1, Blanche A Simpson 1, Hal B Richerson 1, Sidney Leskowitz 1, Morris J Karnovsky 1
PMCID: PMC2138808  PMID: 5523969

Abstract

Delayed onset erythematous skin reactions elicited in guinea pigs early in the course of sensitization with azobenzenearsonate-protein conjugates or with protein antigens in incomplete Freund's adjuvant or in saline were found to have a characteristic morphology which sets them apart from delayed hypersensitivity and the classic antibody mediated reactions. The principle feature was massive dermal infiltration with basophilic leukocytes. Mononuclear cells of several types including activated and small lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and blast cells were also present. Such reactions have in the past been designated Jones-Mote hypersensitivity, but we prefer the descriptive term cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity (CBH) for the reasons given. Occasional basophils extruded their granules, and individual granules, retaining their characteristic ultrastructure, were commonly seen in the interstitium. However, intercellular junctions between endothelial cells were closed except during cell emigration and there was no morphologic evidence of an histamine-like effect. The majority of basophils, moreover, did not degranulate but underwent nuclear pyknosis and cytoplasmic degeneration and were phagocytosed by macrophages. Phagocytosed basophil granules retained their ultrastructure. Skin tests performed at late intervals after sensitization had a different time course and morphology. Animals sensitized with protein antigens in complete Freund's adjuvant developed delayed hypersensitivity; however, reactions elicited in such animals at early (but not late) intervals after sensitization contained a prominent basophil component. We interpret such reactions to be a mixture of delayed hypersensitivity and cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity. The function of the basophil in CBH and its relation to the mononuclear cells which accompany it are unknown, and various possibilities are discussed. We conclude that cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity is a distinct immunologic and morphologic entity, occurring early in the course of sensitization with protein antigens incorporated in any of several vehicles. The mechanism of the reaction is presently unknown, and a general hypothesis to explain its pathogenesis has been proposed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aström K. E., Webster H. D., Arnason B. G. The initial lesion in experimental allergic neuritis. A phase and electron microscopic study. J Exp Med. 1968 Sep 1;128(3):469–495. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.3.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper J. R., Cruickshank C. N. Improved method for direct counting of basophil leucocytes. J Clin Pathol. 1966 Jul;19(4):402–402. doi: 10.1136/jcp.19.4.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cruickshank C. N., Haye K. R. The responses of the basophil leucocyte. J Invest Dermatol. 1968 Nov;51(5):324–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farquhar M. G., Palade G. E. Cell junctions in amphibian skin. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jul;26(1):263–291. doi: 10.1083/jcb.26.1.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foerster J., Green I., Lamelin J. P., Benacerraf B. Transfer of responsiveness to hapten conjugates of poly-L-lysine and of a copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-lysine to lethally irradiated nonresponder guinea pigs by bone marrow or lymph node and spleen cells from responder guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1969 Nov 1;130(5):1107–1122. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.5.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. KARNOVSKY M. J. Simple methods for "staining with lead" at high pH in electron microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:729–732. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KOLIN A., JOHANOVSKY J., PEKAREK J. HISTOLOGICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF CELLULAR (DELAYED) HYPERSENSITIVITY. II. REGRESSIVE CHANGES OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS MUSCULATURE IN THE SKIN TEST TO OVALBUMIN IN GUINEA-PIGS. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1965;26:167–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KOSUNEN T. U., WAKSMAN B. H., FLAX M. H., TIHEN W. S. Radioautographic study of cellular mechanisms in delayed hypersensitivity. I. Delayed reactions to tuberculin and purified proteins in the rat and guinea-pig. Immunology. 1963 May;6:276–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karnovsky M. J. The ultrastructural basis of capillary permeability studied with peroxidase as a tracer. J Cell Biol. 1967 Oct;35(1):213–236. doi: 10.1083/jcb.35.1.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MAJNO G., PALADE G. E. Studies on inflammation. 1. The effect of histamine and serotonin on vascular permeability: an electron microscopic study. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Dec;11:571–605. doi: 10.1083/jcb.11.3.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MARTINS A. B., RAFFEL S. CELLULAR ACTIVITIES IN HYPERSENSITIVE REACTIONS. I. COMPARATIVE CYTOLOGY OF DELAYED, "JONES-MOTE" AND ARTHUS REACTIONS. J Immunol. 1964 Dec;93:937–947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RAFFEL S., NEWEL J. M. The delayed hypersensitivity induced by antigen-antibody complexes. J Exp Med. 1958 Dec 1;108(6):823–841. doi: 10.1084/jem.108.6.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Richerson H. B., Dvorak H. F., Leskowitz S. Cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity. I. A new look at the Jones-Mote reaction, general characteristics. J Exp Med. 1970 Sep 1;132(3):546–557. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.3.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Richerson H. B., Dvorak H. F., Leskowitz S. Cutaneous basophilic hypersensitivity: a new interpretation of the Jones-Mote reaction. J Immunol. 1969 Dec;103(6):1431–1434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SALVIN S. B. Occurrence of delayed hypersensitivity during the development of Arthus type hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1958 Jan 1;107(1):109–124. doi: 10.1084/jem.107.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SHELLEY W. B., JUHLIN L. Functional cytology of the human basophil in allergic and physiologic reactions: technic and atlas. Blood. 1962 Feb;19:208–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Terry R. W., Bainton D. F., Farquhar M. G. Formation and structure of specific granules in basophilic leukocytes of the guinea pig. Lab Invest. 1969 Jul;21(1):65–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wiener J., Lattes R. G., Spiro D. An electron microscopic study of leukocyte emigration and vascular permeability in tuberculin sensitivity. Am J Pathol. 1967 Mar;50(3):485–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Willms-Kretschmer K., Flax M. H., Cotran R. S. The fine structure of the vascular response in hapten-specific delayed hypersensitivity and contact dermatitis. Lab Invest. 1967 Sep;17(3):334–349. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES