Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 May 1;131(5):936–969. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.5.936

THE ROLE OF THE LYMPHATIC SYSTEM IN THE REJECTION OF HOMOGRAFTS: A STUDY OF LYMPH FROM RENAL TRANSPLANTS

Niels C Pedersen 1, Bede Morris 1
PMCID: PMC2138828  PMID: 4910145

Abstract

The rejection of renal homografts has been studied in sheep by transplanting kidneys into the neck and preserving the renal lymphatic drainage intact. Chronic fistulae were established in the transplanted renal lymphatics and lymph collected throughout the life of the graft. The changes that occurred in homografts during the process of rejection were reflected in changes in the lymph. Large numbers of basophilic, blast, lymphoid cells appeared in the lymph, and lymph production in the grafted kidney increased 20–50 fold. Over a period of about 10 days, up to 60 g wet weight of lymphoid cells and up to 10 liters of lymph were collected from the graft. Within 24 hr of grafting, the host cells present in the renal lymph had become sensitized to the graft and transformed into blast cells when cultivated in Millipore chambers in vitro. When the cells leaving the graft during the first 18–48 hr were injected into distant nonstimulated lymph nodes of the host sheep, they evoked significant cellular and antibody responses in the nodes. Within the graft, the main pathological changes were found in the vascular endothelium and many of the peritubular capillaries become plugged with emboli comprised of blast cells. There was extensive infiltration of the renal parenchyma with lymphoid cells and evidence of their transformation and proliferation within the renal blood capillaries. When all the lymph and cells leaving the homograft were diverted from the body, there was a greatly decreased reaction in the regional prescapular lymph node, and no reaction in lymph nodes distant from the graft. In these circumstances, the survival of the graft was not prolonged, and it was rejected without involvement of the lymph nodes of the host. Humoral antibody was produced in the lymph node regional to the homograft within 48–60 hr of grafting. Antibody was not detected in the blood or in the renal lymph until near to the time the graft was rejected. It was thought that this was due to the binding of antibody by the kidney graft tissue. We conclude that all the events which lead to the recognition and rejection of renal homografts can occur centrally within the graft itself.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BILLINGHAM R. E., BRENT L., MEDAWAR P. B. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. II. The origin, strength and duration of actively and adoptively acquired immunity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 Dec 15;143(910):58–80. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1954.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HALL J. G., MORRIS B. THE ORIGIN OF THE CELLS IN THE EFFERENT LYMPH FROM A SINGLE LYMPH NODE. J Exp Med. 1965 Jun 1;121:901–910. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.6.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HALL J. G., MORRIS B. The lymph-borne cells of the immune response. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1963 Jul;48:235–247. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1963.sp001660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUME D. M., EGDAHL R. H. Progressive destruction of renal homografts isolated from the regional lymphatics of the host. Surgery. 1955 Jul;38(1):194–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall J. G. Studies of the cells in the afferent and efferent lymph of lymph nodes draining the site of skin homografts. J Exp Med. 1967 May 1;125(5):737–754. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.5.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LAMBERT P. B., FRANK H. A. BELLMAN S, FARNSWORTH D: THE ROLE OF THE LYMPH TRUNKS IN THE RESPONSE TO ALLOGENEIC SKIN TRANSPLANTS. Transplantation. 1965 Jan;3:62–73. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196501000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Manzler A. D. Serum cytotoxin in human kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1968 Sep;6(6):787–792. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196809000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morris P. J. Immunological aspects of renal transplantation. Aust N Z J Surg. 1969 Aug;39(1):18–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1969.tb05550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Owen J. J., Harrison G. A. Studies on human leucocytes in diffusion chambers on the chick chorioallantois. Transplantation. 1967 Jul;5(4):643–651. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196707000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PORTER K. A., PEART W. S., KENYON J. R., JOSEPH N. H., HOEHN R. J., CALNE R. Y. REJECTION OF KIDNEY HOMOTRANSPLANTS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Nov 30;120:472–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb34746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STROBER S., GOWANS J. L. THE ROLE OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE SENSITIZATION OF RATS TO RENAL HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:347–360. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith J. B., Cunningham A. J., Lafferty K. J., Morris B. The role of the lymphatic system and lymphoid cells in the establishment of immunological memory. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1970 Feb;48(1):57–70. doi: 10.1038/icb.1970.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Spong F. W., Feldman J. D., Lee S. Transplantation antibody associated with first-set renal homografts. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):418–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thompson J. S., Severson C. D., Lavender A. R., Forland M., Russe H. P. Assay of human leukoagglutinins by capillary migration. Transplantation. 1968 Aug;6(5):728–736. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196808000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES