Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1970 Oct 31;132(5):845–857. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.5.845

INDUCTION AND REVERSAL OF IMMUNE PARALYSIS IN VITRO

V S Byers 1, E E Sercarz 1
PMCID: PMC2138880  PMID: 5528413

Abstract

Induction of the immune response can only be completed after antigen is removed from the cellular environment. Primed rabbit lymph node fragments were cultured in vitro with 5 mg/ml BSA. If antigen was removed from the fragments 2 hr later, they produced a normal anti-BSA response, which was first evident 5 days later. If antigen removal was delayed for 3 days, the onset of the response was postponed for 2 to 3 days. Pulses with BUDR marked the periods of cell proliferation in both sets of cultures, and established that the postponement of antibody production was preceded by a postponement in the wave of proliferation among precursors of antibody forming cells. The similarity in avidity of antibody-containing fluids from normal and postponed cultures support the idea that the same cell population produced the response in each case. It was concluded that a reversible state of paralysis could be instituted in antigen-responsive cells, and this state did not depend upon cell-killing. The widespread incidence of temporary paralysis as an early aspect of the immune response was discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (664.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOYDEN S. V. The adsorption of proteins on erythrocytes treated with tannic acid and subsequent hemagglutination by antiprotein sera. J Exp Med. 1951 Feb;93(2):107–120. doi: 10.1084/jem.93.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Byers V. S., Sercarz E. E. The X-Y-Z scheme of immunocyte maturation. V. Paralysis of memory cells. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):715–728. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CLAMAN H. N., TALMAGE D. W. THYMECTOMY: PROLONGATION OF IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE IN THE ADULT MOUSE. Science. 1963 Sep 20;141(3586):1193–1194. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3586.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Celada F., Schmidt D., Strom R. Determination of avidity of anti-albumin antibodies in the mouse. Influence of the number of cells transferred on the quality of the secondary adoptive response. Immunology. 1969 Aug;17(2):189–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dowden S. J., Sercarz E. E. The X-Y-Z scheme of immunocyte maturation. II. The effect of antigen on spontaneous escape from immune paralysis. J Immunol. 1967 Apr;98(4):827–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dresser D. W., Mitchison N. A. The mechanism of immunological paralysis. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:129–181. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. EISEN H. N., SISKIND G. W. VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Biochemistry. 1964 Jul;3:996–1008. doi: 10.1021/bi00895a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FARR R. S. A quantitative immunochemical measure of the primary interaction between I BSA and antibody. J Infect Dis. 1958 Nov-Dec;103(3):239–262. doi: 10.1093/infdis/103.3.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iványi J., Maler M., Wudl L., Sercarz E. High-dose delay of the immune response. Effect of actinomycin D on continuation of the immune response in vitro. J Exp Med. 1968 Jun 1;127(6):1149–1163. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.6.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Makinodan T., Hoppe I., Sado T., Capalbo E. E., Leonard M. R. The suppressive effect of supraoptimum doses of antigen on the secondary antibody-forming response of spleen cells cultured in cell-impermeable diffusion chambers. J Immunol. 1965 Sep;95(3):466–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McConahey P. J., Dixon F. J. A method of trace iodination of proteins for immunologic studies. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;29(2):185–189. doi: 10.1159/000229699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitchison N. A. Recovery from immunological paralysis in relation to age and residual antigen. Immunology. 1965 Aug;9(2):129–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SEVER J. L. Application of a microtechnique to viral serological investigations. J Immunol. 1962 Mar;88:320–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scott D. W., Waksman B. H. Mechanism of immunologic tolerance. I. Induction of tolerance to bovine gamma-globulin by injection of antigen into intact organs in vitro. J Immunol. 1969 Feb;102(2):347–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. Cell selection by antigen in the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1969;10:1–50. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60414-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steiner L. A., Eisen H. N. The relative affinity of antibodies synthesized in the secondary response. J Exp Med. 1967 Dec 1;126(6):1185–1205. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.6.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. TAYLOR R. B. AN EFFECT OF THYMECTOMY ON RECOVERY FROM IMMUNOLOGICAL PARALYSIS. Immunology. 1964 Sep;7:595–602. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES