Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Jan 31;133(2):321–338. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.321

MACROPHAGE-MELANOCYTE HETEROKARYONS

II. THE ACTIVATION OF MACROPHAGE DNA SYNTHESIS. STUDIES WITH INHIBITORS OF RNA SYNTHESIS

Saimon Gordon 1, Zanvil Cohn 1
PMCID: PMC2138902  PMID: 4109113

Abstract

Mouse peritoneal macrophages, which do not synthesize DNA in vitro, were fused with melanocytes, a mouse cell strain which proliferates rapidly in vitro. DNA synthesis was induced in macrophage nuclei 2–3 hr after fusion and occurred irrespective of the number of macrophage nuclei present per melanocyte nucleus in each heterokaryon. 50–80% of macrophage nuclei initiated DNA synthesis in the 3–7 hr period after fusion. The activation of most 11–12-day chick red cell nuclei in melanocyte cytoplasm took longer than 10 hr. The lag before DNA synthesis may reflect the heterochromatin content of each nucleus. Studies with actinomycin showed that heterokaryon RNA synthesis was essential for subsequent macrophage DNA synthesis. This RNA was synthesized 1–4 hr before the DNA and was unlikely to be ribosomal RNA, since it was insensitive to <0.1 µg/ml actinomycin. Melanocytes and macrophages were treated before fusion with actinomycin and bromotubercidin to bring about a more selective inhibition of RNA synthesis. Macrophages pretreated for 1 hr with 5 µg/ml of actinomycin showed less than 20% of control RNA synthesis in the first 4 hr after fusion, but a normal activation of macrophage DNA synthesis. Pretreatment of melanocytes for 3–7 hr with 5 µg/ml bromotubercidin, a reversible inhibitor of RNA synthesis, prevented macrophage DNA synthesis without affecting macrophage RNA synthesis in the heterokaryons (81% of control). These studies showed that only melanocyte RNA synthesis was essential for the production of macrophage DNA. The exposure of one cell partner to actinomycin before fusion caused cross-toxicity of the untreated nucleus after fusion. Bromotubercidin, an adenosine analogue which is incorporated into RNA, did not give rise to such cross-toxicity after fusion. Once the macrophage nucleus becomes activated in the heterokaryon it becomes less sensitive to the action of actinomycin.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (974.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bolund L., Ringertz N. R., Harris H. Changes in the cytochemical properties of erythrocyte nuclei reactivated by cell fusion. J Cell Sci. 1969 Jan;4(1):71–87. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohn Z. A. The structure and function of monocytes and macrophages. Adv Immunol. 1968;9:163–214. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60443-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gordon S., Cohn Z. Macrophage-melanocyte heterokaryons. I. Preparation and properties. J Exp Med. 1970 May 1;131(5):981–1003. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.5.981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harris H. Hybrid cells from mouse and man: a study. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Dec 13;166(1004):358–368. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris H., Watkins J. F., Ford C. E., Schoefl G. I. Artificial heterokaryons of animal cells from different species. J Cell Sci. 1966 Mar;1(1):1–30. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnson R. T., Harris H. DNA synthesis and mitosis in fused cells. I. HeLa homokaryons. J Cell Sci. 1969 Nov;5(3):603–624. doi: 10.1242/jcs.5.3.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mallucci L. T-antigen and DNA synthesis in macrophages infected with polyoma virus. Nature. 1969 Aug 9;223(5206):630–632. doi: 10.1038/223630a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Okada Y., Murayama F., Yamada K. Requirement of energy for the cell fusion reaction of Ehrlich ascites tumor cells by HVJ. Virology. 1966 Jan;28(1):115–130. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(66)90312-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PERRY R. P. ROLE OF THE NUCLEOLUS IN RIBONUCLEIC ACID METABOLISM AND OTHER CELLULAR PROCESSES. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1964 May;14:73–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rao P. N., Johnson R. T. Mammalian cell fusion: studies on the regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis. Nature. 1970 Jan 10;225(5228):159–164. doi: 10.1038/225159a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Reich E., Goldberg I. H. Actinomycin and nucleic acid function. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1964;3:183–234. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60742-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ringertz N. R., Darzynkiewicz Z., Bolund L. Actinomycin binding properties of stimulated human lymphocytes. Exp Cell Res. 1969 Aug;56(2):411–417. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(69)90032-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Virolainen M., Defendi V. Dependence of macrophage growth in vitro upon interaction with other cell types. Wistar Inst Symp Monogr. 1967;7:67–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Furth R., Cohn Z. A. The origin and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Sep 1;128(3):415–435. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES