Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Jan 31;133(2):187–201. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.187

HETEROGENEITY OF THE CELLULAR IMMUNE RESPONSE

I. KINETICS OF LYMPHOCYTE STIMULATION DURING SENSITIZATION AND RECOVERY FROM TOLERANCE

Robert C Bast Jr 1, Eleanor J Manseau 1, Harold F Dvorak 1
PMCID: PMC2138905  PMID: 5316261

Abstract

Lymph node cells from guinea pigs immunized with HSA in complete Freund's adjuvant were grown in cultures containing different concentrations of specific antigen. Stimulation of thymidine incorporation was induced with progressively lower concentrations of HSA at successive intervals after sensitization. Moreover, the intensity of delayed skin reactions and the magnitude of stimulation in vitro increased over the same interval. These events are considered compatible with an evolution of the cellular immune response resulting from the selection of lymphoid cells by decreasing concentrations of antigen in vivo. Cells from animals rendered tolerant to HSA failed to respond to specific antigen in culture. As tolerance waned, stimulation was achieved at high but not low antigen concentrations. Tolerance, measured by cutaneous reactivity or by lymphocyte stimulation, was less readily induced in animals sensitized with adjuvant containing a reduced concentration of mycobacteria. Lymph nodes from these animals contained a large population of cells reactive at high antigen concentration, presumably less susceptible to the toleragenic effect of intravenous antigen. The dissociation of delayed hypersensitivity and antibody formation observed early in the immune response and upon recovery from tolerance has permitted correlation of lymphocyte stimulation with delayed hypersensitivity and cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity respectively.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (852.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BENACERRAF B., GELL P. G. Studies on hypersensitivity. III. The relation between delayed reactivity to the picryl group of conjugates and contact sensitivity. Immunology. 1959 Jul;2:219–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BENACERRAF B., LEVINE B. B. Immunological specificity of delayed and immediate hypersensitivity reactions. J Exp Med. 1962 May 1;115:1023–1036. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.5.1023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bast R. C., Jr, Simpson B. A., Dvorak H. F. Heterogeneity of the cellular immune response. II. The role of adjuvant, lymphocyte stimulation in cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1971 Feb 1;133(2):202–215. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borel Y., David J. R. In vitro studies of the suppression of delayed hypersensitivity by the induction of partial tolerance. J Exp Med. 1970 Mar 1;131(3):603–610. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.3.603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cahn R. D. Detergents in membrane filters. Science. 1967 Jan 13;155(3759):195–196. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3759.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooperband S. R., Bondevik H., Schmid K., Mannick J. A. Transformation of human lymphocytes: inhibition by homologous alpha globulin. Science. 1968 Mar 15;159(3820):1243–1244. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3820.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DVORAK H. F., BILLOTE J. B., MCCARTHY J. S., FLAX M. H. IMMUNOLOGIC UNRESPONSIVENESS IN THE ADULT GUINEA PIG. I. SUPPRESSION OF DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY AND ANTIBODY FORMATION TO PROTEIN ANTIGENS. J Immunol. 1965 Jun;94:966–975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. David J. R. Delayed hypersensitivity in vitro: its mediation by cell-free substances formed by lymphoid cell-antigen interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jul;56(1):72–77. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.1.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dowden S. J., Sercarz E. E. The X-Y-Z scheme of immunocyte maturation. VI. The nature of anti-BSA produced upon spontaneous escape from immune paralysis. J Immunol. 1968 Dec;101(6):1308–1321. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dvorak H. F., Bast R. C., Jr Nature of the immunogen in crystalline serum albumins. Immunochemistry. 1970 Jan;7(1):118–124. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(70)90035-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dvorak H. F., Dvorak A. M., Simpson B. A., Richerson H. B., Leskowitz S., Karnovsky M. J. Cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity. II. A light and electron microscopic description. J Exp Med. 1970 Sep 1;132(3):558–582. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.3.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dvorak H. F., Simpson B. A., Flax M. H., Leskowitz S. The fate of antigen in delayed hypersensitivity skin reactions. J Immunol. 1970 Mar;104(3):718–727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. EISEN H. N., SISKIND G. W. VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE. Biochemistry. 1964 Jul;3:996–1008. doi: 10.1021/bi00895a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. GELL P. G., BENACERRAF B. Studies on hypersensitivity. IV. The relationship between contact and delayed sensitivity: a study of the specificity of cellular immune reactions. J Exp Med. 1961 Mar 1;113:571–585. doi: 10.1084/jem.113.3.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GELL P. G., SILVERSTEIN A. M. Delayed hypersensitivity to hapten-protein conjugates. I. The effect of carrier protein and site of attachment to hapten. J Exp Med. 1962 May 1;115:1037–1051. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.5.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Goidl E. A., Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. The effect of antigen dose and time after immunization on the amount and affinity of anti-hapten antibody. J Immunol. 1968 Feb;100(2):371–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Golub E. S., Weigle W. O. Studies on the induction of immunologic unresponsiveness. II. Kinetics. J Immunol. 1967 Sep;99(3):624–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Linscott W. D., Weigle W. O. Anti-bovine serum albumin specificity and binding affinity after termination of tolerance to bovine serum albumin. J Immunol. 1965 Sep;95(3):546–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Loewi G., Temple A., Vischer T. L. The immunological significance in the guinea-pig of in vitro transformation of lymph node, spleen and peripheral blood lymphocytes. Immunology. 1968 Feb;14(2):257–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McConahey P. J., Dixon F. J. A method of trace iodination of proteins for immunologic studies. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;29(2):185–189. doi: 10.1159/000229699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mills J. A. The immunologic significance of antigen induced lymphocyte transformation in vitro. J Immunol. 1966 Aug;97(2):239–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mitchison N. A. Immunological paralysis induced by brief exposure of cells to protein antigens. Immunology. 1968 Oct;15(4):531–547. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. OVARY Z., BENACERRAF B. IMMUNOLOGICAL SPECIFICITY OF THE SECONDARY RESPONSE WITH DINITROPHENYLATED PROTEINS. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1963 Oct;114:72–76. doi: 10.3181/00379727-114-28589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oppenheim J. J., Wolstencroft R. A., Gell P. G. Delayed hypersensitivity in the guinea-pig to a protein-hapten conjugate and its relationship to in vitro transformation of lymph node, spleen, thymus and peripheral blood lymphocytes. Immunology. 1967 Jan;12(1):89–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B. A study of the 'termination' of tolerance to BSA with DNP-BSA in rabbits: relative affinities of the antibodies for the immunizing and the paralysing antigens. Immunology. 1967 Aug;13(2):147–157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Paul W. E., Siskind G. W., Benacerraf B., Ovary Z. Secondary antibody responses in haptenic systems: cell population selection by antigen. J Immunol. 1967 Oct;99(4):760–770. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. SILVERSTEIN A. M., GELL P. G. Delayed hypersensitivity to hapten-protein conjugates. II. Anti-hapten specificity and the heterogeneity of the delayed response. J Exp Med. 1962 May 1;115:1053–1064. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.5.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. St Rose J. E., Cinader B. The effect of tolerance on the specificity of the antibody response and on immunogenicity. Antibody response to conformationally and chemically altered antigens. J Exp Med. 1967 Jun 1;125(6):1031–1055. doi: 10.1084/jem.125.6.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Theis G. A., Siskind G. W. Selection of cell populations in induction of tolerance: affinity of antibody formed in partially tolerant rabbits. J Immunol. 1968 Jan;100(1):138–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wilson D. B., Silvers W. K., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. II. Relationship of the proliferative response to the immunologic status of the donors. J Exp Med. 1967 Oct 1;126(4):655–665. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.4.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES