Abstract
Pedicles of skin which lacked a lymphatic drainage were raised on the backs of rats in order to study the importance of afferent lymphatics in sensitization by skin allografts. Although allografts transplanted to the alymphatic pedicles enjoyed a prolonged survival, they contracted progressively from about 3 wk after transplantation and were reduced eventually to small scars. In contrast, autografts survived unchanged in size for the life-span of the pedicles which carried them. The slow contracture of the allografts was associated with sensitization of the host because test allografts applied orthotopically were destroyed with a second-set tempo. No regeneration of lymphatics from the long-standing pedicles could be demonstrated, and it was concluded that sensitization had occurred eventually through the blood, presumably by the process of peripheral sensitization. Allografts on skin pedicles could be destroyed rapidly by active or adoptive immunization, so it is probable that the level of sensitization to which they themselves gave rise was a low one. Although it is not disputed that afferent lymphatics are essential for the rapid destruction of skin allografts, it is clear that the absence of a lymphatic supply does not permanently exempt them from immunological attack in the rat.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (738.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barker C. F., Billingham R. E. The role of afferent lymphatics in the rejection of skin homografts. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):197–221. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brent L., Medawar P. Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. VII. The normal lymphocyte transfer reaction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Sep 13;165(1000):281–307. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FREY J. R., WENK P. Experimental studies on the pathogenesis of contact eczema in the guinea-pig. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1957;11(1-2):81–100. doi: 10.1159/000228405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GOWANS J. L., KNIGHT E. J. THE ROUTE OF RE-CIRCULATION OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE RAT. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Jan 14;159:257–282. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HUME D. M., EGDAHL R. H. Progressive destruction of renal homografts isolated from the regional lymphatics of the host. Surgery. 1955 Jul;38(1):194–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lance E. M. A functional and morphologic study of intracranial thyroid allografts in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1967 Sep;125(3):529–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MEDAWAR P. B. The homograft reaction. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Dec 4;149(935):145–166. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macher E., Chase M. W. Studies on the sensitization of animals with simple chemical compounds. XI. The fate of labeled picryl chloride and dinitrochlorobenzene after sensitizing injections. J Exp Med. 1969 Jan 1;129(1):81–102. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedersen N. C., Morris B. The role of the lymphatic system in the rejection of homografts: a study of lymph from renal transplants. J Exp Med. 1970 May 1;131(5):936–969. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.5.936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raju S., Grogan J. B. Allograft implants in the anterior chamber of the eye of the rabbit. Early vascularization and sensitization of the host. Transplantation. 1969 Jun;7(6):475–483. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196906000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- STROBER S., GOWANS J. L. THE ROLE OF LYMPHOCYTES IN THE SENSITIZATION OF RATS TO RENAL HOMOGRAFTS. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:347–360. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]