Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Jun 1;133(6):1325–1333. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.6.1325

INDUCTION OF A HEMOLYSIN RESPONSE IN VITRO

II. INFLUENCE OF THE THYMUS-DERIVED CELLS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANTIBODY-PRODUCING CELLS

Klaus-Ulrich Hartmann 1
PMCID: PMC2138935  PMID: 5103556

Abstract

Spleen cells of bone marrow chimeras (B cells) and of irradiated mice injected with thymus cells and heterologous erythrocytes (educated T cells) were mixed and cultured together (17). The number of PFC developing in these cultures was dependent both on the concentration of the B cells and of the educated T cells. In excess of T cells the number of developing PFC is linearly dependent on the number of B cells. At high concentrations of T cells more PFC developed; the increase in the number of PFC was greatest between the 3rd and 4th day of culture. Increased numbers of educated T cells also assisted the development of PFC directed against the erythrocytes. It is concluded that the T cells not only play a role during the triggering of the precursor cells but also during the time of proliferation of the B cells; close contact between B and T cells seems to be needed to allow the positive activity of the T cells.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (489.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chan E. L., Mishell R. I., Mitchell G. F. Cell interaction in an immune response in vitro: requirement for theta-carrying cells. Science. 1970 Dec 11;170(3963):1215–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3963.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies A. J., Leuchars E., Wallis V., Koller P. C. The mitotic response of thymus-derived cells to antigenic stimulus. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):438–451. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doria G., Martinozzi M., Agarossi G., Di Pietro S. In vitro primary immune response resulting from the interaction between bone marrow-derived and thymus cells. Experientia. 1970 Apr 15;26(4):410–411. doi: 10.1007/BF01896919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dutton R. W., McCarthy M. M., Mishell R. I., Raidt D. J. Cell components in the immune response. IV. Relationships and possible interactions. Cell Immunol. 1970 Jul;1(2):196–206. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutton R. W., Mishell R. I. Cell populations and cell proliferation in the in vitro response of normal mouse spleen to heterologous erythrocytes. Analysis by the hot pulse technique. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):443–454. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hartmann K. U. Induction of a hemolysin response in vitro. Interaction of cells of bone marrow origin and thymic origin. J Exp Med. 1970 Dec 1;132(6):1267–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.6.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirst J. A., Dutton R. W. Cell components in the immune response. 3. Neonatal thymectomy: restoration in culture. Cell Immunol. 1970 Jul;1(2):190–195. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. I. Hemolysin-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):801–820. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Immunological activity of thymus and thoracic-duct lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jan;59(1):296–303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.1.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Munro A., Hunter P. In vitro reconstitution of the immune response of thymus-deprived mice to sheep red blood cells. Nature. 1970 Jan 17;225(5229):277–278. doi: 10.1038/225277a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nossal G. J., Cunningham A., Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 3. Chromosomal marker analysis of single antibody-forming cells in reconstituted, irradiated, or thymectomized mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):839–853. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Perkins E. H., Sado T., Makinodan T. Recruitment and proliferation of immunocompetent cells during the log phase of the primary antibody response. J Immunol. 1969 Oct;103(4):668–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schimpl A., Wecker E. Inhibition of in vitro immune response by treatment of spleen cell suspensions with anti-theta serum. Nature. 1970 Jun 27;226(5252):1258–1259. doi: 10.1038/2261258a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G. Distinct events in the immune response elicited by transferred marrow and thymus cells. I. Antigen requirements and priferation of thymic antigen-reactive cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Dec 1;130(6):1243–1261. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.6.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Taylor R. B. Immune paralysis of thymus cells by bovine serum albumin. Nature. 1968 Nov 9;220(5167):611–611. doi: 10.1038/220611a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES