Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Mar 31;133(4):740–751. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.4.740

ON THE NUMBER AND NATURE OF ANTIGEN-SENSITIVE LYMPHOCYTES IN THE BLOOD OF DELAYED-HYPERSENSITIVE HUMAN DONORS

Luis Jimenez 1, Barry R Bloom 1, Myron R Blume 1, Herbert F Oettgen 1
PMCID: PMC2138963  PMID: 4323070

Abstract

The virus plaque assay has been successfully employed to enumerate antigen-sensitive cells in the peripheral blood lymphocyte populations of tuberculin-hypersensitive human donors. The method is based on the finding that, while resting lymphocytes are unable to produce a variety of viruses upon infection, lymphocytes activated by specific antigens become capable of virus replication. The average number of antigen-sensitive cells detected in cell populations from donors reacting to first test strength or intermediate test strength tuberculin was approximately 3.6/1000 lymphocytes, and the averages for both groups were similar. Studies on the kinetics of appearance of these virus plaque-forming cells and on the effects of the mitotic inhibitor, vinblastine, indicate that the activation of these antigen-sensitive cells is a linear process and that the cells must be nondividing cells during this process. These qualities contrast markedly with those described for the mitogenic response and the antibody-producing cells which require cell division and increase exponentially. On the basis of these experiments it is suggested that the antigen-sensitive cell measured in the virus plaque assay is the effector cell in delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and, in addition, may be one of the cells critically involved in antibody formation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (675.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BLOOM B. R., HAMILTON L. D., CHASE M. W. EFFECTS OF MITOMYCIN C ON THE CELLULAR TRANSFER OF DELAYED-TYPE HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. Nature. 1964 Feb 15;201:689–691. doi: 10.1038/201689a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach F. H., Bock H., Graupner K., Day E., Klostermann H. Cell kinetic studies in mixed leukocyte cultures: an in vitro model of homograft reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Feb;62(2):377–384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.2.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloom B. R., Jimenez L., Marcus P. I. A plaque assay for enumerating antigen-sensitive cells in delayed-type hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):16–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper M. D., Raymond D. A., Peterson R. D., South M. A., Good R. A. The functions of the thymus system and the bursa system in the chicken. J Exp Med. 1966 Jan 1;123(1):75–102. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dutton R. W., Mishell R. I. Cell populations and cell proliferation in the in vitro response of normal mouse spleen to heterologous erythrocytes. Analysis by the hot pulse technique. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):443–454. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edelman R., Wheelock E. F. Vesicular stomatitis virus replication in human leukocyte cultures: enhancement by phytohemagglutinin. Science. 1966 Nov 25;154(3752):1053–1055. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3752.1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HOLBOROW E. J., LOEWI G. The immune response to bloodgroup substances. Immunology. 1962 Mar;5:278–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katz D. H., Paul W. E., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten immune responses. I. Enhancement of primary and secondary anti-hapten antibody responses by carrier preimmunization. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):261–282. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz D. H., Paul W. E., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Radioresistance of cooperative function of carrier-specific lymphocytes in antihapten antibody responses. Science. 1970 Oct 23;170(3956):462–464. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3956.462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kettman J., Dutton R. W. An in vitro primary immune response to 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl substituted erythrocytes: response against carrier and hapten. J Immunol. 1970 Jun;104(6):1558–1561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marshall W. H., Valentine F. T., Lawrence H. S. Cellular immunity in vitro. Clonal proliferation of antigen-stimulated lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1969 Aug 1;130(2):327–343. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller J. F., Osoba D. Current concepts of the immunological function of the thymus. Physiol Rev. 1967 Jul;47(3):437–520. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1967.47.3.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):821–837. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. North R. J. Suppression of cell-mediated immunity to infection by an antimitotic drug. Further evidence that migrant macrophages express immunity. J Exp Med. 1970 Sep 1;132(3):535–545. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.3.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PALMER C. G., LIVENGOOD D., WARREN A. K., SIMPSON P. J., JOHNSON I. S. The action of the vincaleukolastine on mitosis in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1960 Jun;20:198–201. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(60)90234-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Perkins E. H., Sado T., Makinodan T. Recruitment and proliferation of immunocompetent cells during the log phase of the primary antibody response. J Immunol. 1969 Oct;103(4):668–678. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perlmann P., Holm G. Cytotoxic effects of lymphoid cells in vitro. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:117–193. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rajewsky K., Schirrmacher V., Nase S., Jerne N. K. The requirement of more than one antigenic determinant for immunogenicity. J Exp Med. 1969 Jun 1;129(6):1131–1143. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.6.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roitt I. M., Greaves M. F., Torrigiani G., Brostoff J., Playfair J. H. The cellular basis of immunological responses. A synthesis of some current views. Lancet. 1969 Aug 16;2(7616):367–371. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92712-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. SALVIN S. B., SMITH R. F. The specificity of allergic reactions. I. Delayed versus Arthus hypersensitivity. J Exp Med. 1960 Apr 1;111:465–483. doi: 10.1084/jem.111.4.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. UHR J. W., SCHARFF M. Delayed hypersensitivity. V. The effect of x-irradiation on the development of delayed hypersensitivity and antibody formation. J Exp Med. 1960 Jul 1;112:65–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.112.1.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Willems F. T., Melnick J. L., Rawls W. E. Replication of poliovirus in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated human lymphocytes. J Virol. 1969 May;3(5):451–457. doi: 10.1128/jvi.3.5.451-457.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES