Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 May 1;135(5):1009–1027. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1009

CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT CELL TYPES TO THE GENETIC CONTROL OF IMMUNE RESPONSES AS A FUNCTION OF THE CHEMICAL NATURE OF THE POLYMERIC SIDE CHAINS (POLY-L-PROLYL AND POLY-DL-ALANYL) OF SYNTHETIC IMMUNOGENS

G M Shearer 1, Edna Mozes 1, Michael Sela 1
PMCID: PMC2138976  PMID: 4112259

Abstract

Genetic regulation of immunological responsiveness was studied at the cellular level by comparing the limiting dilutions of immunocompetent cells from spleen, thymus, and bone marrow of high and low responders as a function of the poly-L-prolyl and poly-DL-alanyl side chains of two synthetic polypeptide immunogens. The spleens of immunized and unimmunized high responder DBA/1 mice were found to contain respectively, 18- and 7-fold more limiting precursor cells specific for (Phe, G)-A--L than the spleens of SJL low responder donors. These results, using a synthetic polypeptide built on multichain poly-DL-alanine, confirm the findings reported for polypeptides built on multichain poly-L-proline (1, 2), that there is a direct correlation between immune response potential and the relative number of immunocompetent precursors stimulated. Cell cooperation between thymocytes and bone marrow cells was demonstrated for both (T, G)-Pro--L and (Phe, G)-A--L. Limiting dilutions of thymus and bone marrow cells in the presence of an excess amount of the complementary cell type indicated an eightfold lower number of detected (T, G)-Pro--L-specific precursors in DBA/1 (low responder) marrow when compared with SJL (high responder) marrow. No differences were observed in the frequency of relevant high and low responder thymocytes for the (T, G)-Pro--L immunogen. These results are similar to those reported for the (Phe, G)-Pro--L (3). In contrast to the cellular studies reported for the Pro--L series of immunogens, the marrow and thymus cell dilution experiments for (Phe, G)-A--L revealed genetically associated differences in both the marrow and thymus populations of immunocytes from high (DBA/1) and low (SJL) responders. In addition to a fivefold difference in limiting marrow cell precursors (similar to that seen in the Pro--L studies), a striking difference was observed between the helper cell activity of high responder DBA/1 and low responder SJL thymocytes. This difference was indicated by the observation that low responder thymocyte dilutions followed the predictions of the Poisson model, whereas dilutions of high responder thymocytes did not conform to Poisson statistics. Transfers of allogeneic thymus and marrow cell mixtures from DBA/1 and SJL donors confirmed the syngeneic dilution studies showing that the genetic defect of immune responsiveness to (Phe, G)-A--L is expressed at both the thymus and marrow immunocompetent cell level. The parameters presently known for genetic control of immune responses specific for (Phe, G) (Ir-1 gene) and for Pro--L (Ir-3 gene) have been compared. The Ir-1 and Ir-3 genes are not only distinct by genetic linkage tests (to H-2) (5, 6, 9), but they are also seen to be different by cellular studies. Furthermore, expression of low responsiveness within a given cell population was shown to depend on the chemical structure of the whole immunogenic macromolecule.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Hayes L. L. Thymus-marrow immunocompetence. IV. The growth and immunocompetence of transferred marrow, thymus, and spleen cells in parent and F1 hybrid mice. Transplantation. 1969 Feb;7(2):87–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cudkowicz G., Shearer G. M., Ito T. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. VI. Strain differences in class differentiation and other properties of marrow cells. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):623–635. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cudkowicz G., Shearer G. M., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. V. Class differentiation in marrow precursors of plaque-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):481–491. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellman L., Green I., Benacerraf B. Identification of the cell population responding to DNP-GL in lethally irradiated strain 13 chimeric guinea pigs reconstituted with strain 13 bone marrow and (2 x 13) F 1 lymph node and spleen cells. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):445–454. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feldmann M., Easten A. The relationship between antigenic structure and the requirement for thymus-derived cells in the immune response. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):103–119. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Foerster J., Green I., Lamelin J. P., Benacerraf B. Transfer of responsiveness to hapten conjugates of poly-L-lysine and of a copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-lysine to lethally irradiated nonresponder guinea pigs by bone marrow or lymph node and spleen cells from responder guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1969 Nov 1;130(5):1107–1122. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.5.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuchs S., Sela M. Antigenicity of some new synthetic polypeptides and polypeptidyl gelatins. Biochem J. 1964 Dec;93(3):566–572. doi: 10.1042/bj0930566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaton J. C., Sela M. Role of optical configuration in the immunogenicity and specificity of synthetic antigens derived from multichain polyproline. J Biol Chem. 1968 Nov 10;243(21):5616–5626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McDevitt H. O., Benacerraf B. Genetic control of specific immune responses. Adv Immunol. 1969;11:31–74. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McDevitt H. O., Chinitz A. Genetic control of the antibody response: relationship between immune response and histocompatibility (H-2) type. Science. 1969 Mar 14;163(3872):1207–1208. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3872.1207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDevitt H. O., Tyan M. L. Genetic control of the antibody response in inbred mice. Transfer of response by spleen cells and linkage to the major histocompatibility (H-2) locus. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):1–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller H. C., Cudkowicz G. Antigen-specific cells in mouse bone marrow. II. Fluctuation of the number and potential of immunocyte precursors after immunization. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):973–986. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The genetic control of antibody specificity. J Exp Med. 1969 Dec 1;130(6):1263–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.6.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The nature of the antigenic determinant in a genetic control of the antibody response. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):493–504. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mozes E., Shearer G. M. Contribution of bone marrow cells and lack of expression of thymocytes in genetic controls of immune responses for two immunopotent regions within poly-(Phe,Glu)-poly-Pro--poly-Lys in inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):141–161. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mozes E., Shearer G. M., Sela M. Cellular basis of the genetic control of immune responses to synthetic polypeptides. I. Differences in frequency of splenic precursor cells specific for a synthetic polypeptide derived from multichain polyproline ((T,G)-Pro--L) in high and low responder inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):613–622. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PORTER E. H., BERRY R. J. THE EFFICIENT DESIGN OF TRANSPLANTABLE TUMOUR ASSAYS. Br J Cancer. 1963 Dec;17:583–595. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1963.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shearer G. M., Mozes E., Sela M. Cellular basis of the genetic control of immune responses to synthetic polypeptides. II. Frequency of immunocompetent precursors specific for two distinct regions within (Phe, G)-Pro--L, a synthetic polypeptide derived from multichain polyproline, in inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1971 Feb 1;133(2):216–230. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tyan M. L., McDevitt H. O., Herzenberg L. A. Genetic control of the antibody response to a synthetic polypeptide: transfer of response with spleen cells or lymphoid precursors. Transplant Proc. 1969 Mar;1(1):548–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES