Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 May 1;135(5):1204–1208. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1204

ALLOGENEIC AND XENOGENEIC RESPONSE IN MIXED LEUKOCYTE CULTURES

M B Widmer 1, F H Bach 1
PMCID: PMC2138977  PMID: 5022178

Abstract

The mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) test has been regarded as an in vitro model of the recognition or sensitization phase of the homograft or graft-versus-host reaction. It has been suggested that the graft-versus-host response in vivo is less in xenogeneic combinations than in allogeneic ones and that there is a similar quantitative relationship in MLC responses. Given the above interpretation of the MLC test, this could suggest that the lesser reactivity in xenogeneic combinations may be due to a lesser recognition of the stimulus. We have done nine experiments testing allogeneic and xenogeneic combinations in MLC, largely in combinatorial fashion. The results indicate that the response in xenogeneic MLC may be as great as that in allogeneic MLC and that, as in different allogeneic mixtures, there is great variation in the extent to which xenogeneic mixtures may respond.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (258.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos D. B., Bach F. H. Phenotypic expressions of the major histocompatibility locus in man (HL-A): leukocyte antigens and mixed leukocyte culture reactivity. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):623–637. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bach F. H. Transplantation: pairing of donor and recipient. Science. 1970 Jun 5;168(3936):1170–1179. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3936.1170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hartzman R. J., Segall M., Bach M. L., Bach F. H. Histocompatibility matching. VI. Miniaturization of the mixed leukocyte culture test: a preliminary report. Transplantation. 1971 Mar;11(3):268–273. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Häyry P., Defendi V. Mixed lymphocyte cultures produce effector cells: model in vitro for allograft rejection. Science. 1970 Apr 3;168(3927):133–135. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3927.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lafferty K. J., Jones M. A. Reactions of the graft versus host (GVH) type. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1969 Feb;47(1):17–54. doi: 10.1038/icb.1969.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Solliday S., Bach F. H. Cytotoxicity: specificity after in vitro sensitization. Science. 1970 Dec 25;170(3965):1406–1409. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3965.1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilson D. B., Blyth JL NOWELL P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. 3. Kinetics of the response. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1157–1181. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson D. B., Fox D. H. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. VI. Reactivity of lymphocytes from conventional and germfree rats to allogeneic and xenogeneic cell surface antigens. J Exp Med. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):857–870. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilson D. B., Nowell P. C. Quantitative studies on the mixed lymphocyte interaction in rats. IV. Immunologic potentiality of the responding cells. J Exp Med. 1970 Feb;131(2):391–407. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.2.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yunis E. J., Amos D. B. Three closely linked genetic systems relevant to transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Dec;68(12):3031–3035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.12.3031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES