Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 May 1;135(5):1049–1058. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1049

CELL INTERACTIONS IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE IN VITRO

II. THE REQUIREMENT FOR MACROPHAGES IN LYMPHOID CELL COLLABORATION

Marc Feldmann 1
PMCID: PMC2138978  PMID: 4112260

Abstract

The requirement for macrophages in thymus-dependent antibody responses was studied in vitro. Three different macrophage-deficient cell populations were studied: spleen cells passed through a glass bead column at 37°C, spleen cells cultured with specific antimacrophage serum, and thoracic duct lymphocytes. These cell populations from mice primed to dinitrophenylated (DNP) fowl gamma globulin were unable to respond to the homologous conjugate in vitro. DNP-reactive B cells were present in normal proportions, since all three macrophage-depleted populations responded normally to macrophage-independent and thymus-independent DNP flagella. Carrier-reactive T cells were present, as the helper capacity of carrier-primed spleen cells was the same as carrier-primed lymphocytes, and thoracic duct lymphocytes are a well-established source of helper cells. The inhibition of the cooperative response was thus due to removal of macrophages, and this was proven by restoration of thymus-dependent anti-DNP responses by small numbers of anti-θ-treated peritoneal exudate cells. These results suggest that macrophages are essential in cell collaboration, While their exact function in cell collaboration is not yet known, the above observation suggests that the mechanism of T-B collaboration involves the surface of macrophages.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (538.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADA G. L., NOSSAL G. J., PYE J., ABBOT A. ANTIGENS IN IMMUNITY. I. PREPARATION AND PROPERTIES OF FLAGELLAR ANTIGENS FROM SALMONELLA ADELAIDE. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:267–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bretscher P. A., Cohn M. Minimal model for the mechanism of antibody induction and paralysis by antigen. Nature. 1968 Nov 2;220(5166):444–448. doi: 10.1038/220444a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bullock W. W., Rittenberg M. B. Kinetics of in vitro initiated secondary anti-hapten response: induction of plaque-forming cells by soluble and particulate antigen. Immunochemistry. 1970 Mar;7(3):310–314. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(70)90169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A. Immunologic complementation between thymus and marrow cells--a model for the two-cell theory of immunocompetence. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cochrane C. G. Mechanisms involved in the deposition of immune complexes in tissues. J Exp Med. 1971 Sep 1;134(3):75–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham A. J., Szenberg A. Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599–600. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diener E., Armstrong W. D. Induction of antibody formation and tolerance in vitro to a purified protein antigen. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1281–1285. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90394-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feldmann M., Easten A. The relationship between antigenic structure and the requirement for thymus-derived cells in the immune response. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):103–119. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldmann M. Induction of immunity and tolerance in vitro by hapten protein conjugates. I. The relationship between the degree of hapten conjugation and the immunogenicity of dinitrophenylated polymerized flagellin. J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):735–753. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldmann M., Palmer J. The requirement for macrophages in the secondary immune response to antigens of small and large size in vitro. Immunology. 1971 Oct;21(4):685–699. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gowans J. L. Lymphocytes. Harvey Lect. 1968 1969;64:87–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller H. R., Avrameas S. Association between macrophages and specific antibody producing cells. Nat New Biol. 1971 Feb 10;229(6):184–185. doi: 10.1038/newbio229184a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller J. F., Basten A., Sprent J., Cheers C. Interaction between lymphocytes in immune responses. Cell Immunol. 1971 Oct;2(5):469–495. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. I. Hemolysin-forming cells in neonatally thymectomized mice reconstituted with thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):801–820. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. Thymus and antigen-reactive cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:3–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchison N. A. The immunogenic capacity of antigen taken up by peritoneal exudate cells. Immunology. 1969 Jan;16(1):1–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mosier D. E. Cell interactions in the primary immune response in vitro: a requirement for specific cell clusters. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):351–362. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mosier D. E., Coppleson L. W. A THREE-CELL INTERACTION REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shortman K., Diener E., Russell P., Armstrong W. D. The role of nonlymphoid accessory cells in the immune response to different antigens. J Exp Med. 1970 Mar 1;131(3):461–482. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shortman K., Palmer J. The requirement for macrophages in the in vitro immune response. Cell Immunol. 1971 Oct;2(5):399–410. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shortman K., Williams N., Jackson H., Russell P., Byrt P., Diener E. The separation of different cell classes from lymphoid organs. IV. The separation of lymphocytes from phagocytes on glass bead columns, and its effect on subpopulations of lymphocytes and antibody-forming cells. J Cell Biol. 1971 Mar;48(3):566–579. doi: 10.1083/jcb.48.3.566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sulitzeanu D., Kleinman R., Benezra D., Gery I. Cellular interactions and the secondary response in vitro. Nat New Biol. 1971 Feb 24;229(8):254–255. doi: 10.1038/newbio229254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tan T., Gordon J. Participation of three cell types in the anti-sheep red blood cell response in vitro. Separation of antigen-reactive cells from the precursors of antibody-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1971 Mar 1;133(3):520–533. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.3.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor R. B. Cellular cooperation in the antibody response of mice to two serum albumins: specific function of thymus cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:114–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Unanue E. R., Askonas B. A. Persistence of immunogenicity of antigen after uptake by macrophages. J Exp Med. 1968 May 1;127(5):915–926. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.5.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Unanue E. R., Cerottini J. C. The immunogenicity of antigen bound to the plasma membrane of macrophages. J Exp Med. 1970 Apr 1;131(4):711–725. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.4.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES