Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):935–946. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.935

MACROPHAGE-MELANOMA CELL HETEROKARYONS

III. THE ACTIVATION OF MACROPHAGE DNA SYNTHESIS. STUDIES WITH INHIBITORS OF PROTEIN SYNTHESIS AND WITH SYNCHRONIZED MELANOMA CELLS

Saimon Gordon 1, Zanvil Cohn 1
PMCID: PMC2138993  PMID: 4106491

Abstract

Dormant macrophage nuclei initiate DNA synthesis 2–3 hr after fusion of macrophages with exponentially growing melanoma cells. Cycloheximide treatment (1–5 µg/ml) of heterokaryons during the preceding lag period inhibits the initiation of macrophage DNA synthesis, in a reversible fashion. Each type of cell was also treated with streptovitacin A, an irreversible inhibitor of protein synthesis. Pretreatment of the melanoma cells (0.5–2 µg/ml), 1 hr before fusion, inhibited the induction of macrophage DNA synthesis in heterokaryons, whereas pretreatment of macrophages (1–20 µg/ml) had no effect. Melanoma cell pretreatment reduced the incorporation of leucine-3H into the cytoplasm and nuclei of heterokaryons, whereas macrophage pretreatment had no effect. These experiments suggested that melanoma proteins played an important role in the initiation of macrophage DNA synthesis. The relationship between the melanoma cell cycle and macrophage DNA synthesis was studied with synchronous melanoma cells. If the melanoma cells were in S phase at the time of fusion, macrophage DNA synthesis occurred 2 hr later. However, the fusion of melanoma cells in G1 delayed macrophage DNA synthesis until the melanoma nuclei had entered S. Experiments with actinomycin and cycloheximide showed that RNA and protein, essential to achieve DNA synthesis in the macrophage nucleus, were made during late G1 as well as S. Melanoma cells and macrophages differ in their radiolabeled acid-soluble products after incubation in thymidine-3H. Thymidine taken up by the macrophage remained unphosphorylated, whereas it was recovered mainly as thymidine triphosphate from melanoma cells. These findings, as well as those reported previously, suggest that the melanoma cell provides the RNA, protein, and precursors which initiate macrophage DNA synthesis. In the absence of a requirement for new macrophage RNA and protein synthesis, other changes must be responsible for the 2 hr delay in DNA synthesis. These may involve physical changes in DNA, associated with swelling, as well as the transport of melanoma products into the macrophage nucleus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (515.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bolund L., Ringertz N. R., Harris H. Changes in the cytochemical properties of erythrocyte nuclei reactivated by cell fusion. J Cell Sci. 1969 Jan;4(1):71–87. doi: 10.1242/jcs.4.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colombo B., Felicetti L., Baglioni C. Inhibition of protein synthesis in reticulocytes by antibiotics. I. Effects on polysomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1966 Apr 18;119(1):109–119. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(66)90043-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ennis H. L. Structure-activity studies with cycloheximide and congeners. Biochem Pharmacol. 1968 Jul;17(7):1197–1206. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(68)90056-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gordon S., Cohn Z. Macrophage-melanocyte heterokaryons. I. Preparation and properties. J Exp Med. 1970 May 1;131(5):981–1003. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.5.981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon S., Cohn Z. Macrophage-melanocyte heterokaryons. II. The activation of macrophage DNA synthesis. Studies with inhibitors of RNA synthesis. J Exp Med. 1971 Feb 1;133(2):321–338. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grollman A. P. Structural basis for inhibition of protein synthesis by emetine and cycloheximide based on an analogy between ipecac alkaloids and glutarimide antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Dec;56(6):1867–1874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.56.6.1867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gurdon J. B., Woodland H. R. The cytoplasmic control of nuclear activity in animal development. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1968 May;43(2):233–267. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1968.tb00960.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris H. The reactivation of the red cell nucleus. J Cell Sci. 1967 Mar;2(1):23–32. doi: 10.1242/jcs.2.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Merriam R. W. Movement of cytoplasmic proteins into nuclei induced to enlarge and initiate DNA or RNA synthesis. J Cell Sci. 1969 Sep;5(2):333–349. doi: 10.1242/jcs.5.2.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mueller G. C. Biochemical events in the animal cell cycle. Fed Proc. 1969 Nov-Dec;28(6):1780–1789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nordenskjöld B. A., Skoog L., Brown N. C., Reichard P. Deoxyribonucleotide pools and deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in cultured mouse embryo cells. J Biol Chem. 1970 Oct 25;245(20):5360–5368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rao P. N., Johnson R. T. Mammalian cell fusion: studies on the regulation of DNA synthesis and mitosis. Nature. 1970 Jan 10;225(5228):159–164. doi: 10.1038/225159a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson L. R., McCarthy B. J. Stimulation of nuclear DNA and RNA synthesis by cytoplasmic extracts in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1968 Jan 25;30(2):166–172. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(68)90465-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Trevithick J. R. Biosynthes of nuclear proteins in embryos of rainbow trout. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969 Aug 22;36(5):728–734. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(69)90670-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES