Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Oct 31;134(5):1201–1221. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.5.1201

IN VIVO REQUIREMENT FOR A RADIATION-RESISTANT CELL IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO SHEEP ERYTHROCYTES

R M Gorczynski 1, R G Miller 1, R A Phillips 1
PMCID: PMC2139013  PMID: 5165202

Abstract

Experiments have been done to establish whether the radiation-resistant or A cell has a specific function in the initiation of an immune response in mice to sheep erythrocytes (SRBC). All previous demonstrations using accessory (A) cells have involved in vitro assays and are possibly explainable as tissue culture artifacts. If A cells are essential, it should be possible to demonstrate their requirement in vivo. Therefore we first established such conditions. Two methods were found for creating an A-cell deficiency in vivo: (a) A cells disappear gradually from the spleens of irradiated mice, presumably by migration since A-cell function was shown not to be decreased by irradiation. If 3 days elapse between irradiation and transplantation of mixtures of bone marrow and thymus cells (which provide B and T but few A cells), the usual synergistic response does not occur. Addition of large numbers of freshly irradiated spleen cells to the mixture of bone marrow and thymus completely restores the immune response. (b) Injection of 1010 horse erythrocytes into mice suppresses A-cell activity in these mice 24 hr later; a much reduced response to SRBC is obtained when they are given at this time. The response can be partially restored if irradiated spleen cells are given with the SRBC. This observation formed the basis for a quantitative in vivo assay for A cells in which the magnitude of restoration by various suspensions of irradiated cells was used to estimate the A-cell activity of that suspension. A quantitative in vitro assay for A cells was also developed. It was essential for this assay that the total cell number, B-cell number, and T-cell number be kept constant and that only the number of A cells be allowed to vary. Only under these conditions was the response a linear function of the number of A cells added. If the in vivo and in vitro assays are detecting the same class of radiation-resistant cells, the physical properties of the cells active in each assay should be identical. Spleen cells were separated on the basis of both density and sedimentation velocity. Fractions from both separation methods were tested for their content of A cells using both the in vivo and in vitro assays. The density and sedimentation profiles of A cells were similar in both assays. The demonstration that a radiation-resistant cell is required in vivo and that this cell has properties identical to the radiation-resistant cell required in vitro indicates that this cell (the A cell) is directly involved in the initiation of an immune response to erythrocyte antigens.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Thymus-marrow cell combinations. Synergism in antibody production. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1966 Aug-Sep;122(4):1167–1171. doi: 10.3181/00379727-122-31353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dutton R. W., McCarthy M. M., Mishell R. I., Raidt D. J. Cell components in the immune response. IV. Relationships and possible interactions. Cell Immunol. 1970 Jul;1(2):196–206. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eidinger D., Khan S. A., Millar K. G. The effect of antigenic competition on various manifestations of humoral antibody formation and cellular immunity. J Exp Med. 1968 Nov 1;128(5):1183–1200. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.5.1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gorczynski R. M., Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Homogeneity of antibody-producing cells as analysed by their buoyant density in gradients of Ficoll. Immunology. 1970 Nov;19(5):817–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gorczynski R. M., Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Identification by density separation of antigen-specific surface receptors on the progenitors of antibody-producing cells. Immunology. 1971 May;20(5):693–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haskill J. S., Byrt P., Marbrook J. In vitro and in vivo studies of the immune response to sheep erythrocytes using partially purified cell preparations. J Exp Med. 1970 Jan 1;131(1):57–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirst J. A., Dutton R. W. Cell components in the immune response. 3. Neonatal thymectomy: restoration in culture. Cell Immunol. 1970 Jul;1(2):190–195. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Sedimentation analysis of the cells in mice required to initiate an in vivo immune response to sheep erythrocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1970 Oct;135(1):63–67. doi: 10.3181/00379727-135-34988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. Separation of cells by velocity sedimentation. J Cell Physiol. 1969 Jun;73(3):191–201. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040730305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mosier D. E. A requirement for two cell types for antibody formation in vitro. Science. 1967 Dec 22;158(3808):1573–1575. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3808.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mosier D. E. Cell interactions in the primary immune response in vitro: a requirement for specific cell clusters. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):351–362. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Osoba D. Some physical and radiobiological properties of immunologically reactive mouse spleen cells. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):368–383. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roseman J. X-ray resistant cell required for the induction of in vitro antibody formation. Science. 1969 Sep 12;165(3898):1125–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3898.1125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sabet T., Newlin C., Friedman H. Effects of RES "blockade" on antibody-formation. I. Suppressed cellular and humoral haemolysin responses in mice injected with carbon particles. Immunology. 1969 Apr;16(4):433–446. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sabet T., Newlin C., Friedman H. The effect of RES blockade on cellular antibody formation to sheep erythrocytes. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 May;128(1):274–278. doi: 10.3181/00379727-128-32996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shortman K., Diener E., Russell P., Armstrong W. D. The role of nonlymphoid accessory cells in the immune response to different antigens. J Exp Med. 1970 Mar 1;131(3):461–482. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Talmage D. W., Radovich J., Hemmingsen H. Cell interaction in antibody synthesis. Adv Immunol. 1970;12:271–282. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60171-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Unanue E. R., Cerottini J. C. The immunogenicity of antigen bound to the plasma membrane of macrophages. J Exp Med. 1970 Apr 1;131(4):711–725. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.4.711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES