Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):141–161. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.141

CONTRIBUTION OF BONE MARROW CELLS AND LACK OF EXPRESSION OF THYMOCYTES IN GENETIC CONTROLS OF IMMUNE RESPONSES FOR TWO IMMUNOPOTENT REGIONS WITHIN POLY-(PHE,GLU)-POLY-PRO--POLY-LYS IN INBRED MOUSE STRAINS

Edna Mozes 1, G M Shearer 1
PMCID: PMC2139036  PMID: 4934146

Abstract

Previous cellular studies on the genetic regulation of immunological responsiveness for two immunopotent regions within the branched chain synthetic polypeptide (Phe, G)-Pro--L demonstrated a direct correlation between the number of detectable immunocompetent splenic precursor cells and the response patterns of SJL, DBA/1, and F1 mice (21). In order to establish the cellular origin(s) of the genetic defect, the present study first demonstrated that thymus and bone marrow cell cooperation was required for (Phe, G)- and Pro--L-specific immune responses. Secondly, limiting dilution experiments, in which several graded and limiting inocula of marrow cells were mixed with a non-limiting number of 108 thymocytes and injected into irradiated, syngeneic recipients, indicated that the low responsiveness of the SJL and DBA/1 strains to the (Phe, G) and Pro--L specificities, respectively, could be attributed to a reduced number of precursor cells found in bone marrow. About five times more marrow precursors were detected in SJL mice for Pro--L than for (Phe, G), whereas about five times as many precursor cells were estimated for (Phe, G) as for Pro--L in the DBA/1 strain. These differences are similar to those obtained using spleen cells from unimmunized SJL and DBA/1 donors (21), and indicate that these genetically determined variations in responsiveness can be accounted for by differences in the frequencies of monospecific populations of immunocompetent cells present in bone marrow. In contrast, limiting dilution transfers of thymocytes or thymus-derived cells with an excess of syngeneic marrow cells resulted in equally frequent (Phe, G) and Pro--L responses for both SJL ad DBA/1 strains. This finding in conjunction with the observation that the generation of (Phe, G)- and Pro--L-specific responses were associated in individual recipients injected with limiting inocula of thymocytes indicated that a single population of thymocytes was stimulated by (Phe,G)-Pro--L. Therefore, it is improbable that the thymic population of immunocompetent cells contributes to expression of these genetically controlled defects.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson B., Blomgren H. Evidence for a small pool of immunocompetent cells in the mouse thymus. Its role in the humoral antibody response against sheep erythrocytes, bovine serum albumin, ovalbumin and the NIP determinant. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):362–371. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brody T. Identification of two cell populations required for mouse immunocompetence. J Immunol. 1970 Jul;105(1):126–138. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brondz B. D. Complex specificity of immune lymphocytes in allogeneic cell cultures. Folia Biol (Praha) 1968;14(2):115–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan E. L., Mishell R. I., Mitchell G. F. Cell interaction in an immune response in vitro: requirement for theta-carrying cells. Science. 1970 Dec 11;170(3963):1215–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3963.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiller J. M., Habicht G. S., Weigle W. O. Cellular sites of immunologic unresponsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Mar;65(3):551–556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.65.3.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cudkowicz G., Shearer G. M., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. V. Class differentiation in marrow precursors of plaque-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):481–491. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davie J. M., Paul W. E. Receptors on immunocompetent cells. I. Receptor specificity of cells participating in a cellular immune response. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):404–418. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies A. J., Leuchars E., Wallis V., Koller P. C. The mitotic response of thymus-derived cells to antigenic stimulus. Transplantation. 1966 Jul;4(4):438–451. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196607000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellman L., Green I., Benacerraf B. Identification of the cell population responding to DNP-GL in lethally irradiated strain 13 chimeric guinea pigs reconstituted with strain 13 bone marrow and (2 x 13) F 1 lymph node and spleen cells. Cell Immunol. 1970 Oct;1(4):445–454. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(70)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foerster J., Green I., Lamelin J. P., Benacerraf B. Transfer of responsiveness to hapten conjugates of poly-L-lysine and of a copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-lysine to lethally irradiated nonresponder guinea pigs by bone marrow or lymph node and spleen cells from responder guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1969 Nov 1;130(5):1107–1122. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.5.1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuchs S., Sela M. Antigenicity of some new synthetic polypeptides and polypeptidyl gelatins. Biochem J. 1964 Dec;93(3):566–572. doi: 10.1042/bj0930566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gill T. J., 3rd, Kunz H. W., Stechschulte D. J., Austen K. F. Genetic and cellular factors in the immune response. I. Genetic control of the antibody response to poly Glu52 Lys33 Tyr15 in the inbred rat strains ACI and F344. J Immunol. 1970 Jul;105(1):14–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haskill J. S., Byrt P., Marbrook J. In vitro and in vivo studies of the immune response to sheep erythrocytes using partially purified cell preparations. J Exp Med. 1970 Jan 1;131(1):57–76. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaton J. C., Sela M. Role of optical configuration in the immunogenicity and specificity of synthetic antigens derived from multichain polyproline. J Biol Chem. 1968 Nov 10;243(21):5616–5626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kennedy J. C., Treadwell P. E., Lennox E. S. Antigen-specific synergism in the immune response of irradiated mice given marrow cells and peritoneal cavity cells or extracts. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):353–367. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller J. F., Mitchell G. F. The thymus and the precursors of antigen reactive cells. Nature. 1967 Nov 18;216(5116):659–663. doi: 10.1038/216659a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. II. The source of hemolysin-forming cells in irradiated mice given bone marrow and thymus or thoracic duct lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):821–837. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Immunological activity of thymus and thoracic-duct lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jan;59(1):296–303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.1.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mosier D. E., Coppleson L. W. A THREE-CELL INTERACTION REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mosier D. E., Fitch F. W., Rowley D. A., Davies A. J. Cellular deficit in thymectomized mice. Nature. 1970 Jan 17;225(5229):276–277. doi: 10.1038/225276a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The genetic control of antibody specificity. J Exp Med. 1969 Dec 1;130(6):1263–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.6.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The nature of the antigenic determinant in a genetic control of the antibody response. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):493–504. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mozes E., Shearer G. M., Sela M. Cellular basis of the genetic control of immune responses to synthetic polypeptides. I. Differences in frequency of splenic precursor cells specific for a synthetic polypeptide derived from multichain polyproline ((T,G)-Pro--L) in high and low responder inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):613–622. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nossal G. J., Cunningham A., Mitchell G. F., Miller J. F. Cell to cell interaction in the immune response. 3. Chromosomal marker analysis of single antibody-forming cells in reconstituted, irradiated, or thymectomized mice. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):839–853. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. PORTER E. H., BERRY R. J. THE EFFICIENT DESIGN OF TRANSPLANTABLE TUMOUR ASSAYS. Br J Cancer. 1963 Dec;17:583–595. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1963.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sela M. Antigenicity: some molecular aspects. Science. 1969 Dec 12;166(3911):1365–1374. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3911.1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sela M. Immunological studies with synthetic polypeptides. Adv Immunol. 1966;5:29–129. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60272-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G. Distinct events in the immune response elicited by transferred marrow and thymus cells. I. Antigen requirements and priferation of thymic antigen-reactive cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Dec 1;130(6):1243–1261. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.6.1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shearer G. M., Cudkowicz G., Priore R. L. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. IV. Lack of class differentiation in thymic antigen-reactive cells. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):467–480. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shearer G. M., Mozes E., Sela M. Cellular basis of the genetic control of immune responses to synthetic polypeptides. II. Frequency of immunocompetent precursors specific for two distinct regions within (Phe, G)-Pro--L, a synthetic polypeptide derived from multichain polyproline, in inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1971 Feb 1;133(2):216–230. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Taylor R. B. Cellular cooperation in the antibody response of mice to two serum albumins: specific function of thymus cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:114–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tyan M. L., Herzenberg L. A., Gibbs P. R. Lymphoid precursors: thymus independent antibody production. J Immunol. 1969 Dec;103(6):1283–1287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tyan M. L., Herzenberg L. A. Studies on the ontogeny of the mouse immune system. II. Immunoglobulin-producing cells. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):446–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tyan M. L., McDevitt H. O., Herzenberg L. A. Genetic control of the antibody response to a synthetic polypeptide: transfer of response with spleen cells or lymphoid precursors. Transplant Proc. 1969 Mar;1(1):548–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES