Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1971 Aug 1;134(2):553–564. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.2.553

CELLULAR AND HUMORAL RESPONSE TO TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS

I. DEVELOPMENT OF ALLOANTIBODY-FORMING CELLS AND CYTOTOXIC LYMPHOCYTES IN THE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST REACTION

J-C Cerottini 1, A A Nordin 1, K T Brunner 1
PMCID: PMC2139051  PMID: 4397737

Abstract

After transfer into heavily-irradiated allogeneic mice, spleen cells were found to produce two types of effector cells directed against the recipient alloantigens, namely alloantibody plaque-forming cells (PFC) and cytotoxic lymphocytes (CL). Both types of effector cells were detectable in vitro by virtue of their lytic effect on target cells carrying the recipient alloantigens. Alloantibody PFC activity was dependent on the presence of an exogenous source of complement and could be inhibited by the addition of heterologous antisera to mouse µ-chain or Fab fragment in the assay system. CL activity was independent of added complement, was not affected by anti-immunoglobulin antisera, but was inhibited by the addition of antibody against target cell alloantigens. Treatment of the transferred spleen cells with anti-θ-serum and complement before in vitro assays for PFC and CL completely abolished the CL activity but had no effect on alloantibody-plaque formation. These results indicate that the two types of effector cells can be differentiated in vitro by virtue of their susceptibility to anti-θ-serum and the mechanisms by which they cause cell lysis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (649.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brunner K. T., Mauel J., Cerottini J. C., Chapuis B. Quantitative assay of the lytic action of immune lymphoid cells on 51-Cr-labelled allogeneic target cells in vitro; inhibition by isoantibody and by drugs. Immunology. 1968 Feb;14(2):181–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brunner K. T., Mauel J., Rudolf H., Chapuis B. Studies of allograft immunity in mice. I. Induction, development and in vitro assay of cellular immunity. Immunology. 1970 Apr;18(4):501–515. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Canty T. G., Wunderlich J. R. Quantitative in vitro assay of cytotoxic cellular immunity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 Oct;45(4):761–772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cerottini J. C. An antigen-binding capacity test for human immunoglobulin G (IgG) fragments. J Immunol. 1968 Sep;101(3):433–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cerottini J. C., Nordin A. A., Brunner K. T. Specific in vitro cytotoxicity of thymus-derived lymphocytes sensitized to alloantigens. Nature. 1970 Dec 26;228(5278):1308–1309. doi: 10.1038/2281308a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chapuis B., Brunner K. T. Cell mediated immune reactions "in vitro". Reactivity of lymphocytes from animals sensitized to chicken erythrocytes, tuberculin or transplantation antigens. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1971;40(3):321–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen A., Schlesinger M. Absorption of guinea pig serum with agar. A method for elimination of itscytotoxicity for murine thymus cells. Transplantation. 1970 Jul;10(1):130–132. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197007000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FAHEY J. L., WUNDERLICH J., MISHELL R. THE IMMUNOGLOBULINS OF MICE. I. FOUR MAJOR CLASSES OF IMMUNOGLOBULINS: 7S GAMMA-2-, 7S GAMMA-1-, GAMMA-1A (BETA-2A)-, AND 18S GAMMA-1M-GLOBULINS. J Exp Med. 1964 Aug 1;120:223–242. doi: 10.1084/jem.120.2.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HOLM G., PERLMANN P., WERNER B. PHYTOHAEMAGGLUTININ-INDUCED CYTOTOXIC ACTION OF NORMAL LYMPHOID CELLS ON CELLS IN TISSUE CULTURE. Nature. 1964 Aug 22;203:841–843. doi: 10.1038/203841a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haughton G., McGehee M. P. Cytolysis of mouse lymph node cells by alloantibody: a comparison of guinea-pig and rabbit complements. Immunology. 1969 Apr;16(4):447–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mauel J., Rudolf H., Chapuis B., Brunner K. T. Studies of allograft immunity in mice. II. Mechanism of target cell inactivation in vitro by sensitized lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970 Apr;18(4):517–535. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nordin A. A., Cerottini J. C., Brunner K. T. The antibody response of mice to allografts as determined by a plaque assay with allogeneic target cells. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):55–56. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830010111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PORTER R. R. The hydrolysis of rabbit y-globulin and antibodies with crystalline papain. Biochem J. 1959 Sep;73:119–126. doi: 10.1042/bj0730119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES