Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 Mar 31;135(4):924–937. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.924

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING A TWO-GENE MODEL FOR THE H-2 HISTOCOMPATIBILITY SYSTEM OF THE MOUSE

Jan Klein 1, Donald C Shreffler 1
PMCID: PMC2139149  PMID: 4553015

Abstract

The genetic structure of the H-2 system has been traditionally interpreted as consisting of multiple regions controlling histocompatibility antigens. Recently however, many difficulties have been encountered in attempts to construct a single, consistent linear H-2 map on this basis. We have shown that the genetic, serological, and biochemical findings on the H-2 system can be more readily explained by the assumption that there are only two histocompatibility regions (loci) in the H-2 system, H-2D and H-2K, which are separated by loci controlling serum proteins (Ss-Slp), immune response (Ir-1), and perhaps others. Evidence supporting such an interpretation of the H-2 system was obtained by a transplantation analysis of the 14 well-defined H-2 crossovers. F1 hybrids between different H-2 crossovers were produced and challenged with skin grafts from third party strains. The donor-recipient relationships in these combinations were such that in at least 10 cases the skin grafts should have been rejected if the multiple-region H-2 map is correct but should survive permanently if the two-region model is correct. In all instances, the skin grafts survived permanently, providing further evidence for the two-region map of the H-2 complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (825.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AMOS D. B., GORER P. A., MIKULSKA Z. B. An analysis of an antigenic system in the mouse (the H-2 system). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1955 Nov 29;144(916):369–380. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1955.0064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grumet F. C., McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the immune response. Relationship between the immune response-1 gene(s) and individual H-2 antigenic specificities. Transplantation. 1972 Feb;13(2):171–173. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197202000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Klein J., Bailey D. W. Histocompatibility differences in wild mice; further evidence for the existence of deme structure in natural populations of the house mouse. Genetics. 1971 Jun;68(2):287–297. doi: 10.1093/genetics/68.2.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Klein J., Klein D., Shreffler D. C. H-2 types of translocation stocks T(2;9)138Ca, T(9;13)-190Ca and an H-2 recombinant. Transplantation. 1970 Oct;10(4):309–320. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197010000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Klein J., Shreffler D. C. The H-2 model for the major histocompatibility systems. Transplant Rev. 1971;6:3–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1971.tb00457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nathenson S. G. Biochemical properties of histocompatibility antigens. Annu Rev Genet. 1970;4(0):69–90. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.04.120170.000441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Passmore H. C., Shreffler D. C. A sex-limited serum protein variant in the mouse: hormonal control of phenotypic expression. Biochem Genet. 1971 Apr;5(2):201–209. doi: 10.1007/BF00485645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Passmore H. C., Shreffler D. C. A sex-limited serum protein variant in the mouse: inheritance and association with the H-2 region. Biochem Genet. 1970 Jun;4(3):351–365. doi: 10.1007/BF00485752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SNELL G. D., JACKSON R. B. Histocompatibility genes of the mouse. II. Production and analysis of isogenic resistant lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1958 Nov;21(5):843–877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SNELL G. D., SMITH P., GABRIELSON F. Analysis of the histocompatibility-2 locus in the mouse. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1953 Dec;14(3):457–480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. STIMPFLING J. H., RICHARDSON A. RECOMBINATION WITHIN THE HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS OF THE MOUSE. Genetics. 1965 May;51:831–846. doi: 10.1093/genetics/51.5.831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shreffler D C, Owen R D. A Serologically Detected Variant in Mouse Serum: Inheritance and Association with the Histocompatibility-2 Locus. Genetics. 1963 Jan;48(1):9–25. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shreffler D. C., Amos D. B., Mark R. Serological analysis of a recombination in the H-2 region of the mouse. Transplantation. 1966 May;4(3):300–322. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196605000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shreffler D. C., David C. S., Passmore H. C., Klein J. Genetic organization and evolution of the mouse H-2 region: a duplication model. Transplant Proc. 1971 Mar;3(1):176–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shreffler D. C., Snell G. D. The distribution of thirteen H-2 alloantigenic specificities among the products of eighteen H-2 alleles. Transplantation. 1969 Oct;8(4):435–450. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196910000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Snell G. D., Cherry M., Démant P. Evidence that H-2 private specificities can be arranged in two mutually exclusive systems possibly homologous with two subsystems of HL-A. Transplant Proc. 1971 Mar;3(1):183–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stimpfling J. H., Reichert A. E. Strain C57BL-10ScSn and its congenic resistant sublines. Transplant Proc. 1970 Mar;2(1):39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES