Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):604–617. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.604

THE EFFECTS OF MERCAPTOETHANOL AND OF PERITONEAL MACROPHAGES ON THE ANTIBODY-FORMING CAPACITY OF NONADHERENT MOUSE SPLEEN CELLS IN VITRO

Chang Chen 1, James G Hirsch 1
PMCID: PMC2139267  PMID: 4559193

Abstract

Nonadherent mouse spleen cells exhibited poor viability and little or no capacity to form antibodies to sheep red cells in the Mishell-Dutton culture system. Viability and antibody-forming capacity could be restored by addition to these cultures of low concentrations of mercaptoethanol (10–4–10–5 M), or by addition of appropriate numbers of mouse peritoneal macrophages. Macrophage concentrations lower than optimal resulted in lower lymphoid cell viability and correspondingly fewer plaque-forming cells, whereas excess macrophages resulted in marked inhibition of antibody formation despite good viability of the lymphocytes. Restoration of the nonadherent cells with mercaptoethanol was thus much simpler and more reproducible than it was with macrophages; furthermore, the number of plaque-forming cells developed in cultures restored with mercaptoethanol was approximately fourfold higher than it was in cultures restored with optimal numbers of macrophages. In the presence of mercaptoethanol, the plaque-forming capacity of the nonadherent spleen cells was not increased when small numbers of macrophages were added to the system, nor was it decreased when the few macrophages present in the nonadherent cells were further reduced or eliminated. Excess macrophages inhibited antibody formation in the cultures containing mercaptoethanol as they did in control cultures. Optimal restoration of plaque-forming capacity to the nonadherent spleen cells with mercaptoethanol required the reducing agent to be present throughout the 4 or 5 day culture period. Addition of mercaptoethanol 1 or more days after initiation of culture, or transfer of the cells to a medium free of mercaptoethanol before completion of the culture resulted in a reduction in the numbers of plaque-forming cells. The results suggest that mouse lymphoid cells do not require macrophages in order to form antibodies to sheep red cells in vitro, provided mercaptoethanol is present in the culture medium. The mechanism of action of mercaptoethanol under these conditions is not completely clear, but one of its effects is to promote the viability of lymphoid cells in the cultures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (770.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chan E. L., Mishell R. I., Mitchell G. F. Cell interaction in an immune response in vitro: requirement for theta-carrying cells. Science. 1970 Dec 11;170(3963):1215–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3963.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Click R. E., Benck L., Alter B. J. Enhancement of antibody synthesis in vitro by mercaptoethanol. Cell Immunol. 1972 Jan;3(1):156–160. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90237-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cosenza H., Leserman L. D. Cell interactions in antibody formation in vitro. I. Role of the third cell in the in vitro response of spleen cells to erythrocyte antigens. J Immunol. 1972 Feb;108(2):418–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cruchaud A., Unanue E. R. Fate and immunogenicity of antigens endocytosed by macrophages: a study using foreign red cells and immunoglobulin G. J Immunol. 1971 Nov;107(5):1329–1340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diener E., Shortman K., Russell P. Induction of immunity and tolerance in vitro in the absence of phagocytic cells. Nature. 1970 Feb 21;225(5234):731–732. doi: 10.1038/225731a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Feldmann M., Easten A. The relationship between antigenic structure and the requirement for thymus-derived cells in the immune response. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):103–119. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feldmann M., Palmer J. The requirement for macrophages in the secondary immune response to antigens of small and large size in vitro. Immunology. 1971 Oct;21(4):685–699. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorczynski R. M., Miller R. G., Phillips R. A. In vivo requirement for a radiation-resistant cells in the immune response to sheep erythrocytes. J Exp Med. 1971 Nov 1;134(5):1201–1221. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.5.1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gottlieb A. A., Glisin V. R., Doty P. Studies on macrophage RNA involved in antibody production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Jun;57(6):1849–1856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.6.1849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris G. Studies of the mechanism of antigen stimulation of DNA synthesis in rabbit spleen cultures. Immunology. 1965 Dec;9(6):529–541. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartmann K. U. Induction of a hemolysin response in vitro. Interaction of cells of bone marrow origin and thymic origin. J Exp Med. 1970 Dec 1;132(6):1267–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.6.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hersh E. M., Harris J. E. Macrophage-lymphocyte interaction in the antigen-induced blastogenic response of human peripheral blood leukocytes. J Immunol. 1968 Jun;100(6):1184–1194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoffmann M., Dutton R. W. Immune response restoration with macrophage culture supernatants. Science. 1971 Jun 4;172(3987):1047–1048. doi: 10.1126/science.172.3987.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoffmann M. Peritoneal macrophages in the immune response to SRBC in vitro. Immunology. 1970 Jun;18(6):791–797. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaufman S. J. Selective inhibition of cells in the immune response by actinomycin D. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):781–785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lake W. W., Bice D., Schwartz H. J., Salvaggio J. Suppression of in vitro antigen-induced lymphocyte transformation by carrageenan, a macrophage-toxic agent. J Immunol. 1971 Dec;107(6):1745–1751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lonai P., Feldman M. Studies on the effect of macrophages in an in vitro graft reaction system. Immunology. 1971 Nov;21(5):861–867. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Moore R. D., Schoenberg M. D. Restimulation of antibody synthesis by antigen in cultures of lymphocytes. Nature. 1968 Jul 20;219(5151):297–298. doi: 10.1038/219297a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mosier D. E. A requirement for two cell types for antibody formation in vitro. Science. 1967 Dec 22;158(3808):1573–1575. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3808.1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mosier D. E. Cell interactions in the primary immune response in vitro: a requirement for specific cell clusters. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):351–362. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nossal G. J., Austin C. M., Pye J., Mitchell J. Antigens in immunity. XII. Antigen trapping in the spleen. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;29(4):368–383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. PERKINS E. H., MAKINODAN T. THE SUPPRESSIVE ROLE OF MOUSE PERITONEAL PHAGOCYTES IN AGGLUTININ RESPONSE. J Immunol. 1965 May;94:765–777. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Parkhouse R. M., Dutton R. W. Inhibition of spleen cell DNA synthesis by autologous macrophages. J Immunol. 1966 Nov;97(5):663–669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pierce C. W., Benacerraf B. Immune response in vitro: independence of "activated" lymphoid cells. Science. 1969 Nov 21;166(3908):1002–1004. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3908.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sabet T. Y., Friedman H. The effects of RES 'blockade' on antibody formation. IV. Inhibition of plaque-forming cells in spleen cultures treated with carbon particles. Immunology. 1970 Nov;19(5):843–853. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shortman K., Diener E., Russell P., Armstrong W. D. The role of nonlymphoid accessory cells in the immune response to different antigens. J Exp Med. 1970 Mar 1;131(3):461–482. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shortman K., Palmer J. The requirement for macrophages in the in vitro immune response. Cell Immunol. 1971 Oct;2(5):399–410. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90051-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sulitzeanu D., Kleinman R., Benezra D., Gery I. Cellular interactions and the secondary response in vitro. Nat New Biol. 1971 Feb 24;229(8):254–255. doi: 10.1038/newbio229254a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES