Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 Oct 1;136(4):816–831. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.4.816

ONTOGENY OF BURSAL FUNCTION IN CHICKEN

III. IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL FOR HUMORAL IMMUNITY

Paavo Toivanen 1, Auli Toivanen 1, Robert A Good 1
PMCID: PMC2139285  PMID: 4403475

Abstract

To study the occurrence of immunocompetent cells directly responsible for antibody production, cells from yolk sac, embryonic liver, bursa of Fabricius, bone marrow, spleen, or thymus were injected together with SRBC and Brucella abortus into 4-day old cyclophosphamide-treated chicks. A second stimulation was given 4 days later, and samples taken 4 days thereafter were used for antibody titrations. During ontogeny, immunocompetent cells appeared in significant numbers first in the spleen for anti-SRBC responses, but in the bursa for anti-Brucella responses. Later these cells were also found in thymus and bone marrow. In the bursa, cells immunocompetent for anti-SRBC response were not encountered in significant numbers. The slight response to SRBC by transferred bursa cells reflects the presence of stem cells and their immediate descendents in the bursa at different stages of development. These findings are compared with the development and maturation of the stem cell responsible for humoral immunity. In the bursa, development of the stem cell population precedes that of immunocompetent cells. The opposite relationship was found in bone marrow, spleen, and thymus where immunocompetent cells were always present some weeks before the appearance of cells capable of achieving a long-lasting reconstitution of bursa-dependent functions. These observations reveal that the bursa seeds out immunocompetent cells during its entire postembryonic development, but does not release the lymphoid stem cell population before this population has matured sufficiently and before the bursa itself, after fulfilling its function, starts to involute.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong W. D., Diener E., Shellam G. R. Antigen-reactive cells in normal, immunized, and tolerant mice. J Exp Med. 1969 Feb 1;129(2):393–410. doi: 10.1084/jem.129.2.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Hayes L. L. Thymus-marrow immunocompetence. IV. The growth and immunocompetence of transferred marrow, thymus, and spleen cells in parent and F1 hybrid mice. Transplantation. 1969 Feb;7(2):87–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Selner J. C. Thymus-marrow immunocompetence. 3. The requirement for living thymus cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1968 Feb;127(2):462–466. doi: 10.3181/00379727-127-32715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Claman H. N., Chaperon E. A., Triplett R. F. Immunocompetence of transferred thymus-marrow cell combinations. J Immunol. 1966 Dec;97(6):828–832. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dent P. B., Good R. A. Absence of antibody production in the bursa of Fabricius. Nature. 1965 Jul 31;207(996):491–493. doi: 10.1038/207491a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Droege W. Amplifying and suppressive effect of thymus cells. Nature. 1971 Dec 31;234(5331):549–551. doi: 10.1038/234549a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feldmann M., Easten A. The relationship between antigenic structure and the requirement for thymus-derived cells in the immune response. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):103–119. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilmour D. G., Theis G. A., Thorbecke G. J. Transfer of antibody production with cells from bursa of Fabricius. J Exp Med. 1970 Jul 1;132(1):134–147. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.1.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glick B. Morphological changes and humoral immunity in cyclophosphamide-treated chicks. Transplantation. 1971 May;11(5):433–439. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197105000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Good R. A., Cain W. A. Relationship between thymus-dependent cells and humoral immunity. Nature. 1970 Jun 27;226(5252):1256–1257. doi: 10.1038/2261256a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. ISACSON P. Cellular transfer of antibody production from adult to embryo in domestic fowls. Yale J Biol Med. 1959 Dec;32:209–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. JANKOVIC B. D., LESKOWITZ S. RESTORATION OF ANTIBODY PRODUCING CAPACITY IN BURSECTOMIZED CHICKENS BY BURSAL GRAFTS IN MILLIPORE CHAMBERS. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1965 Apr;118:1164–1166. doi: 10.3181/00379727-118-30070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Janković B. D., Isaković K., Petrović S., Vujić D., Horvat J. Studies on antilymphocyte antibody in the chicken. II. Effect of rabbit antithymus and antibursa globulin on immune reactions in young chickens. Clin Exp Immunol. 1970 Nov;7(5):709–722. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeejeebhoy H. F. The effect of heterologous anti-lymphocyte serum on lymphocytes of thymus and marrow origin. J Exp Med. 1970 Nov;132(5):963–975. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.5.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lerman S. P., Weidanz W. P. The effect of cyclophosphamide on the ontogeny of the humoral immune response in chickens. J Immunol. 1970 Sep;105(3):614–619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Longenecker B. M., Sheridan S., Law G. R., Ruth R. F. Measurement of graft-versus-host reactions on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chicken. Transplantation. 1970 Jun;9(6):544–557. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197006000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McArthur W. P., Chapman J., Thorbecke G. J. Immunocompetent cells of the chicken. I. Specific surface antigenic markers on bursa and thymus cells. J Exp Med. 1971 Oct 1;134(4):1036–1045. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.4.1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Orlans E., Rose M. E. Antibody formation by transferred cells in inbred fowls. Immunology. 1970 Apr;18(4):473–482. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PAPERMASTER B. W., BRADLEY S. G., WATSON D. W., GOOD R. A. Antibody-producing capacity of adult chicken spleen cells in newly hatched chicks. J Exp Med. 1962 Jun 1;115:1191–1210. doi: 10.1084/jem.115.6.1191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Playfair J. H. Cell cooperation in the immune response. Clin Exp Immunol. 1971 Jun;8(6):839–856. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Playfair J. H., Purves E. C. Antibody formation by bone marrow cells in irradiated mice. I. Thymus-dependent and thymus-independent responses to sheep erythrocytes. Immunology. 1971 Jul;21(1):113–121. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. SIBAL L. R., OLSON V. H. Production of antibodies by adult hen spleen cells transferred to chick embryos. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 Mar;97(3):575–579. doi: 10.3181/00379727-97-23810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. SIMONSEN M. Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. Prog Allergy. 1962;6:349–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. STERZL J. Presence of antigen; a factor determining the duration of antibody formation by transferred cells. Nature. 1959 Feb 21;183(4660):547–548. doi: 10.1038/183547a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. STPIERRE R. L., ACKERMAN G. A. BURSA OF FABRICIUS IN CHICKENS: POSSIBLE HUMORAL FACTOR. Science. 1965 Mar 12;147(3663):1307–1308. doi: 10.1126/science.147.3663.1307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Seto F. Immunocompetent cells in the blood of immunized chickens. Poult Sci. 1970 Nov;49(6):1673–1680. doi: 10.3382/ps.0491673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sinclair N. R., Elliott E. V. Neonatal thymectomy and the decrease in antigen-sensitivity of the primary response and immunological "memory" systems. Immunology. 1968 Sep;15(3):325–333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Solomon J. B. Ontogeny of cells producing haemolytic antibody or immunocyto-adherence to sheep erythrocytes in the chicken. Immunology. 1968 May;14(5):611–619. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. TRNKA Z., RIHA I. Antibody formation by isolated spleen cells transferred to recipients in absence of homotransplantation reaction. Nature. 1959 Feb 21;183(4660):546–547. doi: 10.1038/183546a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. WARNER N. L. THE IMMUNOLOGICAL ROLE OF DIFFERENT LYMPHOID ORGANS IN THE CHICKEN. IV. FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THYMIC AND BURSAL CELLS. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1965 Jul;43:439–450. doi: 10.1038/icb.1965.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Woods R., Linna J. The transport of cells from the bursa of Fabricius to the spleen and the thymus. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64(4):470–476. doi: 10.1111/apm.1965.64.4.470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES