Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 Oct 31;136(5):1195–1206. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1195

GENETIC CONTROL OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE

THE EFFECT OF GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST REACTION ON THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO POLY-L(TYR,GLU)-POLY-D,L-ALA--POLY-L-LYS IN NONRESPONDER MICE

John C Ordal 1, F Carl Grumet 1
PMCID: PMC2139288  PMID: 4404278

Abstract

The transfer of parental (H-2k/k) nonresponder lymphoid cells into heterozygous (H-2k/q) nonresponder recipients at the time of primary challenge with aqueous poly-L(Tyr,Glu)-poly-D,L-Ala-poly-L-Lys [(T,G)-A--L] elicited the production of both IgM and IgG anti-(T,G)-A--L antibody. Normally, the production of IgG anti-(T,G)-A--L antibody is restricted to strains possessing the responder Ir-1 allele. The timing and intensity of the graft-versus-host (GVH) reaction required for this effect were found to be critical. Injection of H-2k/k cells into H-2k/q recipients 1 wk before antigen challenge did not elicit IgG anti-(T,G)-A--L antibody production, and markedly suppressed IgM anti-(T,G)-A--L antibody production. The transfer of alloimmune (H-2q-primed) H-2k/k cells at the time of antigen challenge was also associated with no IgG and little IgM anti-(T,G)-A--L antibody production. These data are consistent with the model that nonresponder thymus-derived lymphocytes (T cells) activated in a GVH reaction can substitute for (T,G)-A--L-reactive T cells to induce a shift from IgM to IgG anti-(T,G)-A--L antibody production.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (614.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benacerraf B., McDevitt H. O. Histocompatibility-linked immune response genes. Science. 1972 Jan 21;175(4019):273–279. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4019.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cantor H. The effects of anti-theta antiserum upon graft-versus-host activity of spleen and lymph node cells. Cell Immunol. 1972 Mar;3(3):461–469. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90251-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellman L., Green I., Martin W. J., Benacerraf B. Linkage between the poly-L-lysine gene and the locus controlling the major histocompatibility antigens in strain 2 guinea pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jun;66(2):322–328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.2.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green I., Paul W. E., Benacerraf B. The behavior of hapten-poly-L-lysine conjugates as complete antigens in genetic responder and as haptens in nonresponder guinea pigs. J Exp Med. 1966 May 1;123(5):859–879. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.5.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grumet F. C. Genetic control of the immune response. A selective defect in immunologic (IgG) memory in nonresponder mice. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):110–125. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz D. H., Davie J. M., Paul W. E., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten antibody responses. IV. Experimental conditions for the induction of hapten-specific tolerance or for the stimulation of anti-hapten anamnestic responses by "nonimmunogenic" hapten-polypeptide conjugates. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):201–223. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Katz D. H., Paul W. E., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten antibody responses. V. Analysis of cellular events in the enhancement of antibody responses by the "allogeneic effect" in DNP-OVA-primed guinea pigs challenged with a heterologous DNP-conjugate. J Immunol. 1971 Nov;107(5):1319–1328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katz D. H., Paul W. E., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten antibody responses. 3. Stimulation of antibody synthesis and facilitation of hapten-specific secondary antibody responses by graft-versus-host reactions. J Exp Med. 1971 Feb 1;133(2):169–186. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kreth H. W., Williamson A. R. Cell surveillance model for lymphocyte cooperation. Nature. 1971 Dec 24;234(5330):454–456. doi: 10.1038/234454a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McDevitt H. O., Deak B. D., Shreffler D. C., Klein J., Stimpfling J. H., Snell G. D. Genetic control of the immune response. Mapping of the Ir-1 locus. J Exp Med. 1972 Jun 1;135(6):1259–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.6.1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the antibody response. 3. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of the antibody response to (T,G)-A--L in CBA and C57 mice. J Immunol. 1968 Mar;100(3):485–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McDevitt H. O., Sela M. Genetic control of the antibody response. I. Demonstration of determinant-specific differences in response to synthetic polypeptide antigens in two strains of inbred mice. J Exp Med. 1965 Sep 1;122(3):517–531. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McDevitt H. O., Sela M. Genetic control of the antibody response. II. Further analysis of the specificity of determinant-specific control, and genetic analysis of the response to (H,G)-A--L in CBA and C57 mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Nov 1;126(5):969–978. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.5.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller J. F., Basten A., Sprent J., Cheers C. Interaction between lymphocytes in immune responses. Cell Immunol. 1971 Oct;2(5):469–495. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(71)90057-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchell G. F., Grumet F. C., McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the immune response. The effect of thymectomy on the primary and secondary antibody response of mice to poly-L(tyr, glu)-poly-D, L-ala--poly-L-lys. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):126–135. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES