Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1972 Oct 31;136(5):1241–1257. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.5.1241

IMMUNE RESPONSES IN VITRO

VI. GENETIC CONTROL OF THE IN VIVO-IN VITRO DISCREPANCIES IN 19S ANTIBODY SYNTHESIS

Robert E Click 1, Loretta Benck 1, Barbara J Alter 1, Judith C Lovchik 1
PMCID: PMC2139308  PMID: 4563149

Abstract

The finding that the relationship of the in vitro and in vivo responses of different strains of mice is under genetic control indicates that at least two mechanisms must operate under in vivo conditions to control 19S antibody synthesis. One is involved in the termination of 19S antibody synthesis; the other has a regulatory role on the magnitude of the response. In light of these findings, various concepts based on other genetically controlled immune responses and on the limiting dilution technique should be reassessed. Furthermore, the suppressive in vivo mechanism may be an important type of control in the resistance or susceptibility to the establishment or maintainance of neoplasms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (847.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrad A. Genetic control of susceptibility to Friend leukemia virus in mice: studies with the spleen focus assay method. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1966 Sep;22:619–629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell C., Dray S. Conversion of non-immune rabbit spleen cells by ribonucleic acid of lymphoid cells from an immunized rabbit to produce IgM and IgG antibody of foreign heavy-chain allotype. J Immunol. 1971 Jul;107(1):83–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benacerraf B., McDevitt H. O. Histocompatibility-linked immune response genes. Science. 1972 Jan 21;175(4019):273–279. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4019.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biozzi G., Asofsky R., Lieberman R., Stiffel C., Mouton D., Benacerraf B. Serum concentrations and allotypes of immunoglobulins in two lines of mice genetically selected for "high" or "low" antibody synthesis. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):752–764. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bosma M. J., Perkins E. H., Makinodan T. Further characterization of the lymphoid cell transfer system for the study of antigen-sensitive progenitor cells. J Immunol. 1968 Nov;101(5):963–972. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cerottini J. C., Unanue E. R. Genetic control of the immune response of mice to hemocyanin. I. Th role of macrophages. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):732–739. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Click R. E., Benck L., Alter B. J. Immune responses in vitro. I. Culture conditions for antibody synthesis. Cell Immunol. 1972 Feb;3(2):264–276. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cudkowicz G. Genetic control of bone marrow graft rejection. I. Determinant-specific difference of reactivity in two pairs of inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1971 Jul 1;134(1):281–293. doi: 10.1084/jem.134.1.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cudkowicz G., Shearer G. M., Ito T. Cellular differentiation of the immune system of mice. VI. Strain differences in class differentiation and other properties of marrow cells. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):623–635. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuji H., Zaleski M., Milgrom F. Genetic control of immune response to theta-AKR alloantigen. J Immunol. 1972 Jan;108(1):223–230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gasser D. L., Silvers W. K. Genetic control of the immune response in mice. 3. An association between H-2 type and reaction to H-Y. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):875–876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Antigenic competition between heterologous erythrocytes. I. Thymic dependency. J Immunol. 1971 Jun;106(6):1524–1531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grumet F. C. Genetic control of the immune response. A selective defect in immunologic (IgG) memory in nonresponder mice. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):110–125. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HERZENBERG L. A., WARNER N. L., HERZENBERG L. A. IMMUNOGLOBULIN ISOANTIGENS (ALLOTYPES) IN THE MOUSE. I. GENETICS AND CROSS-REACTIONS OF THE 7S GAMMA-2A-ISOANTIGENS CONTROLLED BY ALLELES AT THE IG-1 LOCUS. J Exp Med. 1965 Mar 1;121:415–438. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hartmann K. U. Induction of a hemolysin response in vitro. Interaction of cells of bone marrow origin and thymic origin. J Exp Med. 1970 Dec 1;132(6):1267–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.6.1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Henry C., Jerne N. K. Competition of 19S and 7S antigen receptors in the regulation of the primary immune response. J Exp Med. 1968 Jul 1;128(1):133–152. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lennox E. S. The genetics of the immune response. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1966 Nov 22;166(1003):222–231. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1966.0095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lilly F. Fv-2: identification and location of a second gene governing the spleen focus response to Friend leukemia virus in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1970 Jul;45(1):163–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lilly F. The inheritance of susceptibility to the Gross leukemia virus in mice. Genetics. 1966 Mar;53(3):529–539. doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lotzová E., Cudkowicz G. Hybrid resistance to parental NZW bone marrow grafts: association with the D end of H-2. Transplantation. 1971 Aug;12(2):130–138. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197108000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marbrook J. Primary immune response in cultures of spleen cells. Lancet. 1967 Dec 16;2(7529):1279–1281. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90393-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the antibody response. 3. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of the antibody response to (T,G)-A--L in CBA and C57 mice. J Immunol. 1968 Mar;100(3):485–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McDevitt H. O., Sela M. Genetic control of the antibody response. II. Further analysis of the specificity of determinant-specific control, and genetic analysis of the response to (H,G)-A--L in CBA and C57 mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Nov 1;126(5):969–978. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.5.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Immunization of dissociated spleen cell cultures from normal mice. J Exp Med. 1967 Sep 1;126(3):423–442. doi: 10.1084/jem.126.3.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell G. F., Grumet F. C., McDevitt H. O. Genetic control of the immune response. The effect of thymectomy on the primary and secondary antibody response of mice to poly-L(tyr, glu)-poly-D, L-ala--poly-L-lys. J Exp Med. 1972 Jan;135(1):126–135. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mosier D. E., Coppleson L. W. A THREE-CELL INTERACTION REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF THE PRIMARY IMMUNE RESPONSE in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Oct;61(2):542–547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.61.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mozes E., Maron E., Arnon R., Sela M. [Strain-dependent differences in the specificity of antibody responses toward lysozyme]. J Immunol. 1971 Mar;106(3):862–864. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mozes E., McDevitt H. O., Jaton J. C., Sela M. The genetic control of antibody specificity. J Exp Med. 1969 Dec 1;130(6):1263–1278. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.6.1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mozes E., Shearer G. M., Sela M. Cellular basis of the genetic control of immune responses to synthetic polypeptides. I. Differences in frequency of splenic precursor cells specific for a synthetic polypeptide derived from multichain polyproline ((T,G)-Pro--L) in high and low responder inbred mouse strains. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):613–622. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.4.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Playfair J. H. Strain differences in the immune response of mice. I. The neonatal response to sheep red cells. Immunology. 1968 Jul;15(1):35–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shearer G. M., Mozes E., Sela M. Contribution of different cell types to the genetic control of immune responses as a function of the chemical nature of the polymeric side chains (poly-L-prolyl and poly-DL-alanyl) of synthetic immunogens. J Exp Med. 1972 May 1;135(5):1009–1027. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.5.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shortman K., Diener E., Russell P., Armstrong W. D. The role of nonlymphoid accessory cells in the immune response to different antigens. J Exp Med. 1970 Mar 1;131(3):461–482. doi: 10.1084/jem.131.3.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stockert E., Old L. J., Boyse E. A. The G-IX system. A cell surface allo-antigen associated with murine leukemia virus; implications regarding chromosomal integration of the viral genome. J Exp Med. 1971 Jun 1;133(6):1334–1355. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.6.1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tyan M. L., McDevitt H. O., Herzenberg L. A. Genetic control of the antibody response to a synthetic polypeptide: transfer of response with spleen cells or lymphoid precursors. Transplant Proc. 1969 Mar;1(1):548–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Uhr J. W., Möller G. Regulatory effect of antibody on the immune response. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:81–127. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60465-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES